Wednesday, January 9, 2008
|
AFTERTHOUGHT! |
|
HEALTHCARE
Right out of the gate today, callers wanting to give us their healthcare sob
stories and stake their claims to the lives or property of others. This means I
got a chance to be a butt hole right from the get go. Why, after all, do you
think we call this place The Church of the Painful Truth?
You think these politicians .. Hillary, for instance .. actually give a
flying you-know-what about your health care? The only concern they have for the
state of your health is how they can turn it into power for them. They don't
want the government to control health care in this country because they actually
give a damn about how you feel. They want that control because they know it
gives them control over YOU ... and over YOUR vote.
Think about this ... even if you were educated in government schools, give it a
shot! What are you going to do if a political hack tells you that if you vote
for his or her opponent they're going to make you pay for your own medical care?
Get it? Vote ... nothing but votes.
Moving right along with today's afterthought ....
HERE'S A TASTING OF THE PAULISTA EMAILS WE'VE BEEN GETTING:
|
Subject: Neal
Name: Sam
Message:
Why does Neal Boortz attack the only real, honest presidential
candidate with so many lies and such deception? Boortz comments about
Ron Paul are are nothing but lies. Neal is despicalble!
|
|
Subject: Ron Paul...
Name: Douglas
Message:
...I'am sorry Ron did not go on your show because I think he would
defeat your arguments on this silly cultural war you believe in. But
when you consider that you have called him a "kook", and you have
dissed and tossed invectives at many of the Ron Paul callers (not all
off them), and you have a reputation for being a boorish, arrogant,
insolent jerk, perhaps I can see his point.
As for that other jerk Hannity; he thinks he was so brave walking
amongst the Paul people, (he too has dissed Paul in the past) just like
many others, but lately he has given Paul more air time and has been
more civil as of late. Sean is just another chicken-hawk thumb sucking
big government guy like yourself. You can't hide behind the libertarian
label when you like Elmer Gantry (I mean Hucklebee).
|
|
Subject: No Ron Paul Interview
Name: Andrew
Message:
When you take every free moment to trash Dr. Paul and his supporters,
how can you be surprised when he doesn't want to bother spending time
with you?
When you fail to follow core libertarian tenants, such as supporting
preemptive war, you come off as a complete hypocrite and puppet of the
establishment.
|
Someone please get these people some help |
WHO WOULD HAVE THUNK IT?
Surprise, surprise, surprise. We wake up this morning (those of us who hit
the bag before the New Hampshire numbers really started coming in) to find out
that Hillary Rodham has won the New Hampshire primary with 39 percent of the
vote. That puts here about three percentage points ahead of Barack Obama and
right back into the middle of an actual contest.
As I told my radio stations this morning. This is bad news for America, but
absolutely great news for talk radio. The battle is still on!
News reports credit the regular suspects, die-hard Democrats and ... (Ta Da!) ...
women. Political scientists have been telling us for months that the women were
going to give Hillary the nomination and possibly the White House ... and it looks
like they had that one right. Again --- the Founding Fathers had it right.
As I run through the blogs and articles this morning the question seems to be
how in the wide, wide world of politics did the pollsters get this one so
wrong? The pollsters, of course, are coming up with excuses. Let's see .....
- This is a bi-racial campaign, and they're hard to
poll.
- Not only is this a bi-racial campaign, but it's a
bi-sexual campaign as well, and they're even harder to poll.
- Respondents were lying.
I know ... it would be nice if we could come up with a better phrase than
"bi-sexual" to cover this campaign, but if bi-racial works .. then we'll have to
try to be consistent here.
My thoughts? Well, first ... what the hell do I know. I believed the polls,
though I was surprised by them. One possibility is that New Hampshire voters
who had told the pollsters they were going to vote for Obama got into the voting
booth and started wondering if a black candidate could actually win the
election. I would suggest that in those final seconds before a vote was cast
the voter decided to vote for what they thought might be a more electable
candidate.
Others are saying that Hillary's little crying jag on Monday made the
difference. Women flocked to her when the tears started to fall. Will we see
more? This video shows that Bill has decided to give it a shot.
He shed tears at Hillary's win. All together now .... Awwwwwwwww.
This was an incredible political comeback, and Hillary certainly has the
momentum now.
John McCain? Not going to be the nominee. Enjoy this one for a while, pal.
Your opposition to freedom of speech and your support of amnesty for illegal
aliens ... payback time.
ACTUAL RESULTS AND YOUR PREDICTIONS
Well, you guys did pretty well on the Republican side...but boy did you blow
it predicting the Democratic results. But don't feel bad, you weren't alone. No
one was predicting what happened on the Democratic side.
Democratic Results (with 96% reporting)
Hillary Clinton -----39%
John Edwards ----- 17%
Dennis Kucinich ----- 1%
Barack Obama ----- 37%
Bill Richardson ----- 5%
Republican Results (with 96% reporting)
Rudy Giuliani ----- 9%
Mike Huckabee ----- 11%
Duncan Hunter ----- 0%
John McCain ----- 37%
Ron Paul ----- 8%
Mitt Romney ----- 32%
Fred Thompson ----- 1%
And here's what you predicted:
Which Democratic candidate will win the New
Hampshire primary?
Hillary Clinton -----3%
John Edwards ----- 3%
Dennis Kucinich ----- 3%
Barack Obama ----- 89%
Bill Richardson ----- 2% |
Which Republican candidate will win the New
Hampshire primary?
Rudy Giuliani ----- 2%
Mike Huckabee ----- 14%
Duncan Hunter ----- 2%
John McCain ----- 35%
Ron Paul ----- 15%
Mitt Romney ----- 29%
Fred Thompson ----- 3% |
THE AMAZING DENNIS KUCINICH
Did you hear my interview of Kucinich yesterday? Amazing, absolutely
amazing. [We'll put it in this week's free Boortz Blast email newsletter for
you. You can sign up here
if you're not a subscriber.] Kucinich started rambling about getting rid of the Bush tax cuts and
making the rich pay their fair share of taxes, so I decided it might be time to
see if this 10th District Congressman from Ohio actually knew what he was
talking about.
He didn't.
Kucinich has a long history in congress of trying to shift the tax burden
away from low and middle income Americans onto the backs of the high-achievers.
In 2003 he sponsored a law that would give a "refundable" tax credit to protect
low and middle income people from having to pay Social Security or Payroll
taxes. Kucinich, who is chairman of the "Progressive" (that means liberal)
Caucus also proposed something he called a "tax dividend" for every man, woman
and child. Well, almost every man, woman and child. He wanted to limit the
dividends paid to the top 1% of income earners to only 1% of the total tax cut.
Well, there's our clue. Kucinich doesn't have any idea in the world how much
of the total taxes are paid by the top one percent of income earners ... so I
asked him two questions:
- What percentage of total income is earned by the top
1% of income earners?
- What percentage of total federal income taxes are paid
by the top 1% of income earners.
The answers were astounding. Congressman Dennis Kucinich thinks that the top
1% of income earners earns about 60% of all income, and he thinks that they pay
about 15% of all income taxes. The fact is that the top 1% of all income
earners pull in about 18% of all income and pay 38.8% of all income taxes.
This is an astounding level of ignorance on such an important statistic. You
can excuse a mother of three loading up on Happy Meals for her porky little kids
at a McDonalds for not knowing this .. .but a member of the Congress? Remember
.. the Clinton tax increase passed the House of Representatives by only one vote
... and Kucinich was there ... there without a clue ... there voting for a tax
increase on people he thought earned 60% of all the income but were only paying
15% of all income taxes. Inexcusable.
AND THEN THERE'S RON PAUL
Ok ... now all of you left-wing anti-war moonbats and other various Ron Paul
supporters can back off on all your emails asking me when I'm going to have Paul
on my show.
Yesterday, while we were broadcasting from New Hampshire, we set aside two
segments for a visit from Ron Paul. His campaign told Belinda he would be
there. Sure enough, at the appointed hour, Ron Paul walks into radio row. He
sits down to be interviewed by several radio shows, including that of my Jones
Radio stablemate (and all-around good guy) Ed Schultz. Me? He walked right on
by. Refused to do the interview. His campaign staff told Belinda that he
wouldn't appear on my show because of some of the things I've said about him on
the radio. I guess that would be my repeated assertions that I could not
support Ron Paul, even though he gets many things essentially right, because he
cannot be depended on to protect this country from Islamic fascism.
So .. there you go. No real loss, because Ron Paul is going absolutely
nowhere in this campaign. No sense wasting any more time on him and the flakes
supporting him. Yes ... I know that there are many sensible libertarians in
Paul's camp. Your voices aren't being heard .. .they're being drowned out by
the peace-at-any-price crowd that has hijacked Paul's campaign.
APOLOGIZING TO AHMADINEJAD
A few months back, Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad came to speak at
Columbia University. Fine. We let him speak. That's the American way. It was
a great testament to our country's principals of freedom of speech. Because of
the public outcry, Columbia President Lee Bollinger was forced to give
Ahmadinejad a less than welcoming introduction. The madman then made his
speech, refrained from visiting ground zero, and that was that.
Well now an academic delegation from Columbia University
finds it necessary to visit Tehran and formally apologize to Ahmadinejad.
Not an email. Not an official letter. No. Columbia University professors and
deans of faculty feel the need to travel all the way to Iran to say "I'm sorry
our president introduced you in such a way that may have offended you."
Give me a freakin' break. Apparently since the speech, President Bollinger
has been widely criticized by deans and professors from the departments of
history, anthropology, Middle Eastern studies, philosophy and Islamic studies.
My question is, why? Why do these academics feel the need to apologize to man
who runs a country that knowingly supports terrorism ... a country that just days
ago threatened to suicide bomb three of our navy ships? The need to appease
Islamic radicals starts right here, with these peace-at-any-price professors.
Remember, please, that Columbia is the home of one of the most "respected,"
if that's the correct word, journalism schools in the country. Think about
that for a few moments before we move on.
EXPENSIVE HEALTH CARE
In 2006,
the nation's healthcare bill was more than $2 trillion. That's an average
of $7,026 for every person; a 6.7% increase in costs, which is well over the
rate of inflation. Most of these costs come from just 10% of the population.
These people account for over 60% of the healthcare costs.
Just what do you think is the underlying reason why these costs are
increasing? More government involvement. Did you Democrat voters read that?
More government involvement is leading to increased prices. I say this because
the role of government in healthcare has grown – yes, even under President Bush.
(Well, since every other area of government has grown under Bush, why not
healthcare?) The prescription costs paid by the federal government have
increased significantly, thanks to Medical drug benefits that were proposed by
Bush and passed by a GOP Congress.
Health economist Jack Rodgers says that we are on a path to the government being
a larger and larger payer for healthcare ... and in the long term, that means
being the majority payer. Currently, federal, state and local governments
already pay 47% of the nation's healthcare costs. And if we keep this up, the
government's share will be more than half by 2017. If Democrats like Hillary
Clinton or John Edwards or even Barack Obama get their hands on our healthcare
system, government could be paying more than half of the nation's healthcare
costs by 2011.
This is real, folks. Our government is already heading down a narrow
Nanny-state path. If a Democrat wins in 2008, I'm afraid there will be
absolutely no turning back.
PENGUIN IN THE COURTROOM
A judge in Great Britain has been reprimanded for refusing to handle a case
of a Muslim woman
because she wore a full veil covering her face. Ian Murray walked out of
the court room when Zoobia Hussain entered wearing the veil. Murray says that
the veil raised identity issues. The woman was accused of criminal damage after
causing thousands of dollars of damage to a council house when her family was
thrown out.
Her lawyer explained that her client is a practicing Muslim who covers
herself in public places where men are present. Her case was later dealt with
by a female district judge. Hussain did lift her veil but gave evidence from
behind a screen so men in the court room couldn't see her.
This is so absurd.
Mr. Murray was issued a formal reprimand for refusing to bend to the every
wish of the Islamic religion. Inch by inch ...
MICHIGAN GUN LAWS
This is for all you Second Amendment protestors. Six years ago, Michigan
made it much easier
to get a license to carry a concealed weapon. Since then, the number of
Michigan residents carrying legal concealed weapons has increased more than
six-fold. The usual anti-gun rhetoric would tell us that there much be a lot of
increased violence in Michigan. We're sure that every morning the police are
busy picking up the bodies that are scattered about ... victims of gun-wielding
citizens.
Sorry .. .the typical anti-gun rhetoric would be wrong.
According to law enforcement officials, the incidence of violent crime in
Michigan since the law went into effect has been below the rate of the previous
six years. In other words, there was less crime once citizens were able to arm
themselves. The overall incidence of death from firearms has also gone down.
The police chief says that the general consensus is that things were not as bad
as they expected.
Well that's not surprising. After all, studies of concealed weapons laws
show that crime rates reduce when citizens are allowed easier access to
concealed weapons. What does the gun control lobby have to say about those
statistics?
REDNECK SCRAP BOOK
You know, it's all fun and games
until someone gets
electrocuted. More in the Redneck Scrap Book.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
Check out Jamie
Dupree's analysis of the New Hampshire primaries.
In case you didn't catch it, Hillary Clinton is suggesting that
Al Qaeda wants Barack Obama to win the presidential election. Fact is that
Al Qaeda would prefer almost any Democrat over a Republican.
Huckabee wants to end the absurdity of anchor babies ... birthright
citizenship. Oh wait,
here comes the flip flop.
Voter ID laws? What's the problem with asking a voter to prove who they are
before they cast a vote?
Who could possibly object?
Lamestream media journalists are admitting that it is
hard to stay objective when covering Barack Obama ... like they were to begin
with. Do these reporters carry smelling salts?
Colin Powell
sang his praises for Barack Obama on the eve of the New Hampshire primary.
Powell says that Obama has not projected himself to be a black candidate – he
has never made the race to be about his race.
And is Hillary
losing the Hollywood crowd to Barack Obama? Maybe John Edwards?
President Bush actually
endorsed Turkey's bid to join the EU. He says that the Islamic nation could
be a "constructive bridge" between the West and the Muslim world.
Clinton staffers seem to be getting desperate. So desperate that they are
willing to
call Portland, Oregon to make sure that residents are voting in the New
Hampshire primary ... wait, what?
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
wants a constitutional amendment to give him more power over state spending.
More than one million immigrants
sought US citizenship last year so that they could vote in the 2008
election.
Schools in Britain are
finger printing students at lunchtime to make sure that they get the meals
that parents want them to eat.
The Supreme Court of Georgia is trying to decide whether or not to continue
its policy of banishment, to get rid of criminals within populous areas.
The Dallas Morning News named
an Illegal Immigrant as Texan of the Year 2007. Needless to say, there were
some very unhappy (legal) Texans.
Four teenagers in Texas have been suspended from school for
refusing to get their haircut. Their dress code also specifies that
students are not to wear mismatched socks.
A Boy Scout in Maldives
managed to save his president from assassination by a man in the crowd with
a knife.
Americans are
suffering from heart problems caused by fears of terrorism post 9/11.
A badly deformed baby was
denied entry to New Zealand for surgery. Now she may be headed to
Australia.
A New York town
wants to ban silly string from parades because it chips away at the paint of
fire trucks.
Police in South Africa say that they have
caught the "dumbest criminal." The man went to the police station and said
he had been held at gunpoint by a gang who had stolen his cell phone. So when
police called the "stolen" cell phone ...
PETA has removed Britney Spears from their Worst Dressed list because "she
might not be sanely responsible for her actions." This includes wearing fur.
Earlier this week there was some discussion of a newsletter written by Ron
Paul a few years back .. a newsletter that seemed to be a bit, shall we say,
harsh in racial terms. Remember, now ... The New Republic isn't what you would
call right-of-center, but here's an article
about Ron Paul as the Angry White Man. Just FYI.
|