Friday - January 19, 2007
WEATHER CHANNEL ABSURDITY
Perhaps the most bizarre story of the
week comes from Weather Channel Meteobabe Heidi Cullen. Apparently she
hosts a show called "The Climate Code."
Let's all bask for a moment in the extremely clever play on "The DaVinci
Code" popularity.
OK .. That's enough. Back to Hysterical Heidi. Cullen wants the
American Meteorological Society (AMS), the group that certifies TV
weathermen, to decertify any weatherman who dares to question the "fact"
that man is causing catastrophic global climate change.
Note, please, that the phrase "Global warming" is no longer really in
vogue. After all ... ice just destroyed much of California's citrus crop.
So the word now is "climate change."
Here's what Cullen had to say
on her blog:
"If a meteorologist can't speak to the fundamental science of climate
change, then maybe the AMS shouldn't give them a Seal of Approval.
Clearly, the AMS doesn't agree that global warming can be blamed on
cyclical weather patterns. It's like allowing a meteorologist to go
on-air and say that hurricanes rotate clockwise and tsunamis are caused
by the weather. It's not a political statement...it's just an incorrect
statement."
To Cullen the "fundamental science of climate change" is that global
warming is being caused by man. She completely discounts cyclical weather
patterns which have been proven by science. The earth has been this warm in
the past .. warmer .. many times. Cullen doesn't explain why. By the way
... it has been pointed out that hurricanes do rotate clockwise in the
southern hemisphere -- but why be picky.
Here's another blog you might be interested in.
The Weather Blog. This is from AMC certified Meteorologist James Spann.
He says that he does not know of a single TV Meteorologist who buys into the
man-made global warming hype. There are some excellent comments posted to
Spann's blog. A good read.
Don't you just love a good juicy controversy?
HOW STUPID IS THIS?
OK ... Who among us doesn't know that you can't carry a bottle of water
through an airport security check? OK .. maybe if you've never flown on a
commercial airliner, and you have no plans to do so in the future .. you
might not know. That is if you don't read newspapers and don't have a radio
or a TV. In other words ... If you were raised in a shack in the Everglades
without electricity and no contact with the outside world you might not know
you can't carry a bottle of water through an airport security check?
But what if you are a highly-paid, college "educated" nationally known
NFL quarterback who is constantly jet-setting around the country? Then ---
you know.
So, tell me then. Why would the aforesaid highly-paid, college
"educated", nationally known NFL quarterback obtain a water bottle with a
clever little compartment behind the label where one can hide stuff --
marijuana, for instance -- and then
try to get it through an airport
security check? Further --- why would you throw a fit when they tell you
you have to throw the water away? The security screeners know that you can
buy another bottle of water on the concourse ... so you don't think they're
going to get suspicious when you act like they're trying to castrate you
when they take your precious water?
So --- why would someone do this? Simple. Because they're a dumb ass,
that's why.
PELOSI WON'T STOP THE SURGE
As predicted,
Nancy Pelosi is not going to stop funding for President Bush's
troop surge. Why not? If you're so opposed to it, Madame Speaker...why not
put your money where your mouth is? The answer is because no one is buying
her alternative to the war in Iraq.
The Democrats that have taken power in Washington D.C. this month largely
due to the war in Iraq. They got there by criticizing the Bush
Administration and capitalizing on the public's frustration with the lack of
progress over the course of the last 4 years. They did not get there by
offering any sort of alternative plan. They don't have one. All they have
is the surrender option, which nobody wants. So what else is Nancy Pelosi
going to do?
George W. Bush called her bluff...and she folded. We have just witnessed a
rarity in American politics. A president with a 30-some-odd percent
approval rating staring down a brand new, popularly elected Congress. Bush
and his team correctly calculated that the American people will not tolerate
any shorting of our troops when it comes to spending money, so the Democrats
can't stop his surge.
Is Iraq a mess? No doubt, it is. The consequences of cutting and running
at this time might be worse.
MUSLIMS MAD AT JACK BAUER AGAIN
Muslims are again
upset at their portrayal on Fox's hit TV show '24.' And
just why do they have their turbans in a wad? They're upset that Muslims
are being portrayed as suicide bombers. Oh my! Can you believe that? And
Muslims object to this? Aren't all suicide bombers Islamic? Seems like a
realistic portrayal to me. But don't tell that to CAIR, the Council on
American-Islamic Relations. They're quite upset.
Whined a spokesperson for CAIR: "The overwhelming impression you get is
fear and hatred for Muslims. After watching that show, I was afraid to go
to the grocery store because I wasn't sure the person next to me would be
able to differentiate between fiction and reality." For somebody that seems
to be so outraged, she sure sat all the way through the four-hour season
premiere. But we've seen and heard all this before.
Now remember ... the founders of CAIR have openly expressed their desire to
see the U.S. under Islamic Law. You won't hear that from CBS or CNN.
Two years ago when the bad guys on '24' were Muslims, CAIR threw a fit then
and Fox ran a PSA with Keifer Sutherland that said all Muslims are not
terrorists. We know that. Besides, it's a TV show. The thin-skinned bunch
down at CAIR headquarters need to get over themselves. Besides...how should
they portray suicide bombers? Make them Amish? That wouldn't be very
realistic.
THE GARGOYLE RIPS OFF THE U.N.
The stench continues to rise from Kofi Annan's tenure at the UN. Today we
learn that North Korea has been scamming the United Nations Development
Program. The $4 billion program, paid for by member nations such as the
United States, was bilked by Kim Jong-Il for all sorts of money and
services. Once again, the question needs to be asked...what purpose does
the United Nations serve?
So not only do we have the U.N. Oil-For-Food rip-off, which so far nobody
except Saddam Hussein has answered for, but now this. Yet another tinhorn
dictator ripping off the U.N. and by extension, the American people. And to
what extent? At least tens of millions of dollars. And here's the worst
part....the United Nations has known about it for 8 years...and done nothing
about it.
And if it weren't for
an exclusive Fox News report, we never would know about it. And the
news gets worse...plenty of people tried to warn the U.N. about it...but it
fell on deaf ears. So once again, we have to ask the question, just what
exactly is the reason for the United Nations? Why do we continue to throw
some $3 billion a year down this rat hole? Why do we allow them to have
valuable Manhattan real estate? Why do we let them get away without paying
their parking tickets?
Nice to know the U.N. was putting your hard-earned tax dollars to work in
North Korea.REDNECK SCRAP BOOK How can you tell when your redneck neighbor won the lottery? More in the
Redneck Scrap Book.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
| Guest: Fark.com's Creator Drew Curtis, creator of
fark.com joined Neal on the show today. Hilarity ensued.
Ceiling cat declined to comment. Miss it? Listen here. |
The media is wringing its hands because of the rules established for the
tribunals down at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Never has somebody shown so much
concern for Islamic terrorists. After all, we just might execute
somebody...we can't have that.
ABC was congratulating the Democrats on-air for completing their 100-hour
agenda in only 42 hours. As it turns out, ABC wasn't so complimentary 12
years ago when it was Republicans passing their agenda.
Newsbusters has more.
There may be some presidential pardons in the cards for the two Border
Patrol agents who are wasting away in the slammer for doing their jobs.
President Bush said in an interview recently that he'll look at the
situation, but only after the pardons work their way through the proper
channels.
One Weather Channel meteorologist says the American Meteorological Society
should not certify weather forecasters that are skeptical about global
warming. Because as we all know, anyone who dares to question the
church of global warming has obviously lost his or her mind.
Hillary Clinton's campaign is already turning up the heat on Barack Obama,
exposing new information about his background in an attempt to gain the
upper hand. They say Obama has not been forthcoming about his Muslim
background. Let the mud fly!
David Limbaugh has a message for politicians that want to re-institute
the Fairness Doctrine and silence talk radio: beware of the word
"fairness." Anytime the government tries to regulate something and make it
fair, look out.
John Kerry has finally had a good idea...and we here at Reading
Assignments would like to make note of it. The Poodle is calling for a
probe into the sales of military surplus items to Iran. Nice going.
Hopefully this compliment will not go to his head.
The conventional wisdom in Washington seems to be that there are only two
options in Iraq. 1.) Send more troops and try to win or 2.) throw in the
towel and cut and run.
Charles Krauthammer offers a plausible plan B for Operation Iraqi Freedom.
John Podhoretz calls out the Duke faculty for their disgraceful handling of
the Lacrosse player's rape case...in which three students were falsely
accused of rape.
Podhoretz says their treatment was so outrageous, it should be protested.
Robert B. Reich...the former Clinton Labor Secretary and very much a liberal
Democrat,
is criticizing his party for their lack of action on ethics reform. He
says the new Congress' reform measures do nothing to address the real source
of political corruption in Washington. Priceless.
|