Wednesday -- March 30, 2005
A
DISASTER FOR RACE RELATIONS IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Race warlords in Georgia are screaming. They are mightily upset.
"Governor Perdue, don't sign this bill!!!!" Oh the
humanity. This hideous and horrible bill is being cast by race pimps as
"a disaster for race relations in the State of Georgia." One
black legislator said that this new bill was "spitting on the grave of
Martin Luther King, Jr." This bill is so bad that black lawmakers
staged a walkout when the measure was debated earlier this month. They
said that it could turn back the clock on civil rights. "It's an
attack on the rights of minorities."
So, what's going on? Well, it seems that both the Georgia House and
Senate have passed bills requiring all voters to show some kind of picture ID
before they can cast a vote. [HB
244 | SB
84] Any one of six different types of picture ID will do. A
driver's license will work, even if it is expired. The law provides for
free state-issued picture IDs for anyone who wants one. Still, the race
pimps aren't satisfied.
You know what's going on here, don't you? Voter fraud is a reality, and
across this country most of the votes that are illegally cast are cast for
Democrats. It is Democrats who are driving the demands that non-citizens
be allowed to vote in local elections. It is Democrats who are even
insisting that illegal aliens be permitted to vote in some areas. It is
Democrats who have opposed each and every move, no matter where, to attempt to
clean up the election process by making sure that people who vote are actually
legally qualified to vote. It is Democrats who want felons to vote!
They know that felons will, by and large, vote for Democrats.
I'll say it again. Most illegally cast votes are cast for
Democrats. Democrats have been at the forefront of every move to loosen
voting restrictions and to counter any attempt to combat voter fraud.
Now .. if you really want to hear Democrats howl ... make it easier for
military personnel to vote. Military personnel, you see, usually vote
Republican.
SENDING
LAURA TO AFGHANISTAN ISN'T ENOUGH
President Bush's ratings are at a new low. That really is a
shame. The news coming out of Iraq is very positive right now. The
Iraqis are just about to seat their first popularly elected government in about
fifteen camel generations. The news in Afghanistan is also good, and the
idea of freedom and allowing people to participate in the selection of those who
will rule them is gaining traction virtually throughout the Middle East.
So ... Bush is trying to bolster his falling approval ratings by sending Laura
to Afghanistan and by touting his successes in Iraq.
May I make some suggestions here? May I suggest that the principal
reason for the precipitous drop in Bush's popularity ratings might be due to the
fact that Americans .. not all, but many ... are just a little bit upset that
Bush so eagerly injected the federal government into what should be a private
family matter? Right now we have the staffs of two United States Senators,
Harkin, a Democrat from Iowa, and Martinez, a Republican from Florida, working
to put together a law that would require federal court review of any family
dispute about a patient without a living will. Why a federal court
review? Why can't this be handled in the state courts? Why do we
have to expand the scope and power of the Imperial Federal Government to the
point that the tentacles of government reach into the very heart of intra-family
relations? What can the federal courts do here that the state courts
cannot? Estate matters, wills and such, have always been adjudicated by
local courts. What is the role of the federal government here?
We all know the answer here, don't we .. and the answer points us to one of the
principle reasons for the decline in Bush's approval ratings. There is one
reason that the Congress got involved in this unpleasantness in Florida.
One reason that Bush rushed back to Washington to sign legislation injecting the
federal government into that situation, and one reason Harkin and Martinez are
working on their legislation to expand the powers of the federal
government. That reason is pressure from anti-abortion advocates and
religious extremists.
Definition needed. Just how do you define a religious extremist?
I define a religious extremist as anyone who wants to use the power of law --
and that means deadly force -- to force their religious principals on someone
else. Someone who openly calls for a theocracy in America, as Randall
Terry has done, is an extremist. Randall Terry is at the center of
the Florida controversy. Bush's actions were seen by some as pandering to
Randall Terry. These Florida hospice protestors who wandered down the
street about 10 days ago to harass an auto shop owner for daring to work on a
Sunday would be examples of religious extremists. Bush's actions were seen
as pandering to these zealots. This frightens people. Many Americans
become a little concerned when they see their president going out of the way to
meet the demands of people who openly call for a theocracy and who hammer
someone who is working on Sunday to make ends meet while raising his two sons
alone.
Now ... I can assure you that what I have written thus far here in Nealz Nuze
will bring more hate mail with more of those childish "I'm never going to
listen to you again" closes. To many it is absolutely forbidden to say
anything that can be construed as negative about anyone who expresses a strong
Christian belief. To do so means that you don't love Jesus. If you
say that you don't want to live under Randall Terry's idea of a Christian
theocracy, you don't love Jesus. If you say that a man working hard to
support his family shouldn't be harassed because he works on Sunday, you don't
love Jesus. If you say that while you admire the religious devotion shown
by some devout Christians, but that you don't want them telling you how to live
your life, you don't love Jesus.
If George Bush wants to calm people down, and send his approval ratings back
up again, perhaps he could assure the Americans that he believes that
America is not going to become a theocracy under his watch, and that the rule of
law does, and will continue to hold sway over the wishes of those who want to
order the lives of others along strictly defined religious lines. But the,
that would mean that he doesn't love Jesus.
IRS:
$300 BILLION UNPAID TAXES
The deadline to file your taxes with the Imperial Federal Government of the
United States is fast approaching -- April 15 is a little over two weeks
away. With this in mind, the IRS weighed in yesterday with a handy
reminder about "paying your fair share." Usually, whenever you
hear this, it means you should grab your wallet and run. But when the IRS,
an agency with the ability to put you in jail, speaks up, it's worth listening.
According to IRS Commissioner Mark Everson, the gap between taxes paid and taxes
owed is $300 billion. He says this is even after enforcement efforts and
collections of late payments. So who owes the money? According to the IRS,
it's individuals, not businesses. The largest source of this uncollected
amount comes from underreported business income, such as those who are
self-employed, money from rent, royalties, etc. He didn't mention eBay this
time.
At any rate, near the end of his remarks, Mr. Everson said something quite
interesting. He said that despite increased audits, "No one should think we
can totally eliminate the gap. That would take draconian measures and make
the government too intrusive." What he means is that in order for the
IRS to recover every penny owed, they would have to monitor every financial
transaction, something that people wouldn't tolerate. So what's the
answer?
The answer is the Fair Tax plan. As long as the federal government taxes
income and relies on voluntary compliance, the system is going to be very
inefficient and people are going to pay as little of their taxes as they
can. But there is another way. Instead of taxing income, the feds
should tax consumption.
What if when you got paid, you actually received the gross amount on your
paycheck, with no deductions for federal income tax? Then, when you spent
money, you would pay a 23% sales tax on goods and services, with a monthly
rebate check coming your way for taxes on goods and services. You would
file no yearly income tax return, there would be no IRS to speak of, and
compliance would be at or near 100%.
Read more about it at Fairtax.org,
then contact your Congressperson and tell them to support the FairTax Act.
HELL
NO KOFI WON'T GO
The Volcker
report [pdf] investigating the Iraqi Oil-For-Food program came out
yesterday, and things aren't looking too good for U.N. Secretary-General Kofi
Annan. Chief among the report's findings:
- It criticized Kofi for not determining the exact nature of his son's
relationship with a company that won a major oil-for food contract
- It blames Annan for not effectively investigating the connections between
his son and the company when he learned about them in January 1999
- The report accuses Kojo Annan and his company of trying to hide their
relationship from the U.N.
Kofi held a press conference pretending that the report exonerated him of any
wrongdoing. When asked if he would be stepping down, he said "Hell
no." As the noose tightens and there are more investigations and more
reports, how long before Kofi throws in the towel?
The Oil-For-Food program run by the United Nations is one of the biggest corrupt
slush funds in the history of the world. We haven't even scratched the
surface of who was paying who and nobody even knows where all the money
went. That Kofi Annan could stand up there and pretend to not know what
was going on is an insult to every nation that pays dues into that worthless
organization.
Time for Kofi (and the entire UN) to go.
ARNOLD
SCHWARZENEGGER
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is causing quite a stir out on the
left coast. In office for only 16 months, the governator is kicking ass
and taking names. As you might expect, those being kicked aren't too happy
about it. But what Arnold is doing should be a template for every governor
in the nation.
Each political party in the country, once it seizes control of the legislature,
goes about trying to re-draw the boundaries of Congressional districts.
This is done by both Democrats and Republicans to maximize incumbency and make
it statistically impossible for any real opposition to occur. This
Gerrymandering is nothing short of outright political corruption, but it has
been going on so long that it has become accepted. Enter Arnold
Schwarzenegger. In an attempt to drain the Sacramento swamp and reform the
system, he wants to take
the power of redistricting away from the politicians and put it in the hands
of an independent panel of judges. And he's not giving in.
He is taking
on the teacher's union by backing merit pay and changes in tenure
requirements. He wants to replace the expensive state pension system with
private accounts. The list goes on and on. And he shows no signs of
backing down. In fact, he says if the legislature won't act on his proposals,
he'll take the issue straight to the public with California's proposition
system.
It's too bad Arnold can't run for president....we could use more like him.
TRAMP STAMP SHOWDOWN
The discussion this week turned to back tattoos. Neal and Royal each have their own opinion of them. Do you know of a back tattoo you think is sexy? Maybe we can use it.

Belinda's youngest "Orville"
READING ASSIGNMENTS
The Minuteman Project is a case of an all-volunteer group of citizens exercising
their Constitutional rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and
freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances. Michelle
Malkin (sigh) says it's outrageous that the ACLU is opposed to their
activities.
The entire Terri Schiavo saga is a
sickening display of cynicism and fanaticism, says Cathy Young. She
explains that while people opposed to Schiavo's death mean well, there just
isn't a Terri Schiavo left to save.
Moammar Khadafi recently lectured a meeting of the Arab League...with hilarious
results. Amir
Taheri dissects what it all means, including the reactions from other Arab
leaders.
Townhall.com's fund drive is going well, and Star
Parker thanks everyone who has contributed so far. If you enjoy the
columns on the site, feel free to throw a few bucks their way.
Should Congress pass legislation just because it's a good idea? Walter
Williams has an example of a good idea, but should Congress make it the law
of the land? Thought-provoking, and not to be missed.
The media has decided that they will talk to anyone about anything, making them
a celebrity and an authority on whatever the subject at hand is. Kathleen
Parker talks about the child molester who has become an on-air pundit.
What college has the craziest feminists? Professor
Mike Adams says it's not UNC-Wilmington, where he teaches, but rather
another school. Read his column to find out which one and why.
The celebrity gossip business isn't doing too well in the old media these
days.
Tony Blankley says it's because the Internet is taking over, but he reminds
people that not everything you read online is even remotely true.
Does the Terri Schiavo case spell the end of the road for conservatism? A
number of columnists and journalists think so, but
Jonah Goldberg says not so fast.
Some countries choose to conduct their monetary policy by pegging the value of
their currency to the U.S. Dollar...for example, China. Jack
Kemp says this is a good idea, and explains why. An interesting
explanation of monetary policy that won't make your head hurt. Too much.
Police officer suspended for nearly
keeping doctor for delivering baby. |