Tuesday, April 27, 2004
THE PATHETIC POODLE
So
... how has The Poodle decided to handle the revelation that he most certainly
lied about that anti-war demonstration in 1971 -- you know, the one where he
said he threw away his medals?
Come on, give the man a break here! He's caught ... red handed!
There just is no way out of this one. Either he lied when he said he threw
away his medals, or he lied when he said he didn't throw away his medals.
Which is it, John? Either he lied when he told the Washington Post in 1985
that he didn't really throw his medals away because he wanted to keep them, or
he lied when he told the Boston Globe in 1996 that he didn't throw them away
because he didn't have time to go home and get them before the
demonstration. He's already tried that "I threw away my ribbons, and
they're the same thing" nonsense .. and it didn't work.
So ... what now for sKerry? Why, criticize George Bush's military
record, that's what! Make the false claim that George Bush has never shown
that he completed his obligation to the National Guard!
And what did Kerry have to say about Bill Clinton when people started
questioning his draft-dodging? Kerry said:
"We do not need to divide America over who served and how. I have
personally always believed that many served in many different ways."
Different strokes for different parties, I guess.
THE POODLE TRIES TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT
When confronted with irrefutable contradictory evidence that he lied about
throwing away his medals, John Kerry has responded not with an explanation, but
with the charge that the evil Republicans are attacking him. Poor
baby...don't have the facts on your side? Then just throw a temper tantrum
start screaming about how it's not fair.
When asked about it yesterday on ABC's Good Morning America, The Poodle
accused Republicans of attacking him. He did have a lame, weasel answer to
the question: Kerry says he threw his ribbons over the fence, and that those
were often referred to as "medals." Uh-huh....whatever.
All he did was keep trying to change the subject and call it a "phony
controversy." Of course, all day yesterday the media dutifully
repeated the charge in headlines such as "Kerry calls flap over medals
'phony controversy.' The Bush-hating liberals in the press sure do serve
their master well, don't they?
The Poodle is also trotting out the Bush National Guard service again.
"This comes from a president who can't even show or prove that he
showed up for duty in the National Guard." The only problem with that
is Bush has released all of his military records, and also records showing that
he was paid for the guard duty in question. Kerry hasn't released all of
his military records....where is the media on this? Typical liberal
response...when accused of doing something, don't explain yourself, just attack
the accuser.
Kerry is a liar. Now he's using the Clinton strategy of deflect and
deny, and except for ABC, he's being allowed to get away with it.
MIDDLE EAST GETS A TASTE OF ITS OWN MEDICINE
Government officials in Jordan say they thwarted an Al-Qaeda plan to set off
a chemical bomb and attack the U.S. Embassy and other targets there. Had
they been successful, officials say as many as 20,000 people would have
died. The suspects, in a confession aired on Jordanian television, said
their aim was to kill 80,000 people. They also said they were taking
orders from Al-Qaeda. Maybe now the Arab world will confront their problem
of Islamic terrorism ... but probably not. It's the United States' fault, you
know.
The brutal fact of the matter is that it is basically up to the United States
and Great Britain, with the help of Italy, Australia and a too-small cadre of
allies, to fight and to destroy the threat of Islamic terrorism.
Euro-weenie countries like France and Germany, with their large Arab
populations, don't have the courage to play a role. Once again they're
relying on the United States to keep them safe, all the while seeking cover from
their Muslim inhabitants by criticizing our every move.
Every American, especially those who think our invasion of Iraq is wrong,
should take a few minutes today to consider the implications of a chemical
terrorist attack in America ... one like the attack planned in Jordan.
What happens to our economy when 100,000 people are killed in Manhattan?
Which presidential candidate is most feared by the Arab world? Important
questions.
The fact of the matter is something like that could very easily happen here.
That's why the war on terror is so important and why terrorists must be
defeated. The Poodle wants to end the war on terror and treat it like a law
enforcement problem. Which would you rather have? A president willing to
track these people down and kill them, or a president willing to track them down
and serve them with a subpoena?
There's no way to protect against an attack like this...except to take
pre-emptive action and eliminate the terrorist cells.
ISRAEL: IRAQ HAD CHEMICAL WEAPONS AT START OF WAR
The weapons of mass destruction issue has faded a bit, but don't worry, it
will come back. The media, Democrats and some so-called
"Republicans" have expressed dismay that no weapons of mass
destruction have been found in Iraq since the war began. Of course, we
know that Saddam had them, used them and was hiding them. But what about
at the time of the U.S.-led invasion?
Israeli Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Moshe Ya'alon said that before the
war, Iraq had developed the ability to fit planes with chemical weapons that
could have been used in a chemical attack against Israel. He also says Iraq
either buried their banned weapons or transferred them to another country, such
as Syria. He says, in fact, that the Iraqis were seen transferring
something to Syria.
So the question is this: once the weapons of mass destruction are found, and
they will be found, will everyone apologize to George Bush and Tony Blair?
Of course not.
FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE OUTRAGE
Print this out ... go warm up a cup of coffee .. then come back and read
this. I'm furious. Frightened and furious. So mad, in fact,
that I could literally spin around on my eyebrows and spit wooden nickels.
You heard me talk about it yesterday. Hell ... you heard me rant about it
yesterday, then finish with a promise that I would put my thoughts in the Nuze
for you to do with as you please.
The issue? Two bills, essentially identical; one making its way through
the Florida House, the other in the Florida Senate. The House bill is HB
1513, sponsored by Rep. Gayle Harrell, a Republican from the Stuart area.
She's a former government school teacher. Her House office number is 850-488-8749.
The Senate Bill is SB 2548, sponsored by Sen. Mike Bennett, another
Republican. Bennett is from the Bradenton area. His Senate phone
number is 850-487-5078.
OK .. so what's the big deal? Both HB1513 and SB2548 would give to
local Florida governments the power to take property away from an individual
landowner and sell it to a private developer for a shopping center, office
development, or virtually any other private purpose. This legislation
would allow any local government in Florida to seize private property and hand
it over to a private developer for no other reason than to increase the amount
of money the local government could get from that piece of property by way of
real estate taxes. The government's responsibility to the land
owner? To pay the owner a "fair" price. Fair .. as
determined by the government. Isn't this just great? Two Republicans
showing us all that the Republican Party is the party of freedom and property
rights. And you wonder why I'm a Libertarian?
Back to your history books. Not the nonsensical dog dung they force on
our government school students today, but the the straightforward world
histories written by great men and women who weren't bound by the dictates of
multi-culturalism and political correctness that pollutes virtually all of
modern education. Look into a comprehensive history of this world and I
will guarantee you that you will not find one society, one culture, one country
based on economic and social freedom that did not guarantee the property rights
of its citizens. Not one.
What good is the freedom to use your talents and your willingness to work
hard to acquire wealth in the form of property if the government, on a whim, can
simply seize that property from you with compensation that only a government
bureaucrat would consider fair.
How many times have you looked at a piece of real property and thought to
yourself, "Man, if I bought that property right now, and then sat on it for
a few years, it could really be worth something!" Throughout our
history many millions of Americans have taken that very thought and put it into
action. First they dedicated their savings and no small amount of their
future work effort to the purchase a piece of property. Then they sat back
and waited to see just how much they can get for it five, ten, fifteen or twenty
years hence.
Here's how it used to work. Here's how it's supposed to work.
Let's say you're a developer. There's nothing wrong with being a
developer. You probably bought your home from one. They're good for
the economy, though they have to be watched like hawks. OK, you're a
developer. You're driving through town and you see a few pieces of
property that you think would make a dandy strip shopping center. You
search the real estate records and get the names of the owners of each
individual parcel of real estate in that block. You have an agent pay
these people a visit. You make an offer to buy their property. The
property owner can then do one of three things. He can sell at the price
you offered. He can negotiate for a higher price, or he can simply tell
you that he doesn't want to sell. If the owner doesn't want to sell you
certainly can keep upping the offer .. so high, if you wish, that the owner's
eyes are bugging out like a stomped-on bullfrog. But ... if the owner
doesn't want to sell, at any price and under any circumstances, that's used to
be the end of it. You, Mr. Developer, simply go out there and find another
location for your strip mall. Maybe a location where people might be more
eager to sell.
That's the way it used to be. That's not the way it is now. If
this anti-property rights legislation becomes law in Florida the scenario will
be quite different. The developer will discover a piece of property that
he thinks would be a great site for a shopping center, an office development ...
whatever. But, the developer does not go to the individual property
owners to strike a deal. He knows that if he goes to the individual
property owners they might drive the price way, way beyond what he is willing to
pay. After all, what if the owner of that property has been hanging onto
it for years so that he could make a big profit? What if that person
bought that property 20 years ago just for this day? Just for the day that
some developer would want it for a Wall-Mart, a McDonalds, or a big office
park? Good grief! That greedy property owner is going to want a
profit! A big one! The developer, certainly doesn't want to deal
with him! No! Why deal with him when all the developer has to do is
go visit his friendly local county commissioner or city councilmember
instead! He knows that the politician remembers his generous campaign
contributions during past elections, so he expects nothing less than open arms
and full cooperation.
So the developer spins a yarn to the politician. Its a wonderful story
... a story about an expanded tax base and hundreds of jobs for his
constituents. It's a story about additional property tax money that the
politician can use to buy votes with various projects around town. It's a
story about the politician's need for more money to spend versus a greedy
private property owner who dared to actually believe that owning real estate
actually meant something. It's a story the politician likes.
So ... the machinery of government is brought to bear. The property
owner will soon come to a full understanding of the vital difference between
himself and government. Government can use force to accomplish its goals,
while he cannot. The developer has now managed to harness the government's
unique asset, the ability to use force, to be used for his personal gain.
The private property owner is helpless against the onslaught ... especially
after the Harrell-Bennett Elimination of Individual Property Rights Act of
2004. The property is taken. It doesn't matter whether the property
was just being held as an investment, or if it was a family home for generations
past ... it's gone. All the property owner has left to do is to wait to
find out what the government considers a "fair price" for his property
to be. One thing is certain. The government will find that that
property was worth far less to its original owner than the value placed on it by
the developer.
How do politicians justify this? How can so many Republicans, who are
supposed, after all, to be opposed to big government and always poised to rush
to the defense of individuals threatened by government. Just listen to the
statements of some of Florida's finest:
Senator Mike Bennett, the Senate sponsor, says that the bill is absolutely
essential for some communities where thousands of individuals own small
residential lots. Well isn't that a shame. All of those individuals
actually buying residential lots, and then being stupid enough to believe that
those lots would belong to them until they decided they wanted to sell ... so
long as they paid their taxes, of course. The good Senator Bennett doesn't
believe that an individual's property rights should be able to get in the way of
some good local commercial development, now does he?
Then we have Terry Stewart. Stewart is the City Manager for Cape
Coral. He's been in Tallahassee lobbying for the bill. He says that
Cape Coral needs more commercial development, and the bill would help the city
to accumulate the property it needs. The trouble, Mr. Stewart, is that the
property already belongs to someone else. Damned inconvenient, isn't it,
when property rights get in the way of your city management.
The Mayor of Cape Coral is Arnold Kempe. He says that eminent domain is
the only way to assemble land. Hey, Mayor Kempe. Try buying
it. Try giving the owners a good profit on their wise investment ...
instead of trying to steal it from them.
These bills deserve to die. At a time when other states are actually
acting to preserve the property rights of their citizens, these Florida
legislators are acting to eviscerate property rights at every level. I'm
led to understand that the Senate will be voting on SB 2548 today.
Tomorrow the politicians may be after a piece of property across town or down
the street. The day after tomorrow it may be your property. Do you
care enough about your property rights to make a call?
THE TIMING OF THE CLINTON MEMOIRS
Now it seems that the release date for Bill Clinton's much-anticipated
memoirs will be late June. That's the story today. Maybe it will be
a week or so later ... who knows? At any rate, the timing of the release
is sure to overshadow John Kerry's coronation at the Democratic National
Convention during the last week in July. The Kerry Klan is none-too-happy
about the release date.
Question: Is the release date of Clinton's book mere
happenstance? If Clinton were truly supportive of Kerry's candidacy would
he not delay the release of the book for a more opportune time ... say after the
election? Surely delaying the book wouldn't mean that he would sell less
copies, would it?
Just remember ... the Clintons do not want Kerry to win. They want the
field to be wide open in 2008 for The Hildabeast. They're treacherous and
dishonest. Kerry had better watch his back.
YOU, TOO, CAN HELP FIGHT TERRORISM
Solely as a public service Nealz Nuze has agreed to share a plan with you ...
a plan to eliminate possible Islamic terrorist cells in many of America's larger
cities.
As you may know, it is a sin for a devout Muslim to see any woman other than
his wife naked. If he does happen to see another naked women, he must
commit suicide to purge his soul. So, understanding this about devout
Muslims, at 4:00 p.m. this coming Saturday, May 1st, women in major American
cities with large Muslim populations are going to strip naked and walk about
their neighborhoods. The plan is to walk about the neighborhood for one
hour in an effort to cause any lurking Al Qaeda sleepers to end their own
miserable lives. Good luck ladies! And thanks for the effort!
READING ASSIGNMENTS
It's about damned time. Marines in Fallujah were taking sniper fire
from a mosque ... more specifically from a minaret. The
minaret is no more. As I said in yesterday's Nuze ... worship there,
it's a mosque. Fire on Marines from there, it's a military target.
In case you missed it, here's
the transcript of The Poodle's interview yesterday morning on Good Morning
America. It looks as dumb in print as it sounded on TV.
U.N. Special Envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, supposedly in charge of determining who
we will hand power over to in Iraq on June 30th, is actually an idiot. William
Safire explains.
Why does there seem to be a bipartisan consensus in Washington to avoid
crushing the insurgency with overwhelming military force? Frederick
W. Kagan takes a look.
The Oil-for-food scam seems to have spread corruption at all levels of the
U.N. Claudia
Rosett asks: what did Kofi Annan know and when did he know it?
The Hildabeast is back...and surprise...she wants to talk about health
care. Thomas
Sowell breaks it down.
Pat Tillman is a hero in this country, but just how would he be regarded by
various countries around the world? Dennis
Prager has the answer, and it may surprise you.
In a culture obsessed with celebrity, Pat Tillman even enlisted in another
state so he would not stand out. Jack
Kemp tells us more.
Do most people agree or disagree that Iraq is becoming another Vietnam?
Matt
Towery looks at the numbers.
Since the Democrats and the media seem to be drilling President Bush over
blame for 9/11, Joel
Mowbray wonders why Clinton is getting off the hook.
Since John Kerry would end the war on terror, Mark
Alexander says The Poodle is the Islamic Jihadist's great white hope.
No matter what the Democrats and the media throw at him, President Bush is
riding a wave of popularity. Armstrong
Williams says people are willing to stick it out in Iraq.
|
UPCOMING APPEARANCES OF THE
HIGH PRIEST
Check back tomorrow and I hope to tell
people who live in these areas how they might attend! |
|