MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2003
MORE THANKS ...
This time to the Campus Libertarians from the University of Missouri for their invitation to speek on campus Saturday! The campus was beautiful, and the audience very receptive. Thank you so much for the warm welcome!
The Talkmaster stands in front of the Pilatus PC12 he flew (left seat) to Columbia, Missouri and back on Saturday for a speech at the University of Missouri. This beautiful airplane was provided by
Epps Aviation at PDK airport in Atlanta. If The Godfather can have a $25 million dollar airplane, you would think I could have a little $3.4 million dollar PC12, wouldn't you? If I could buy any airplane out there ... this would probably be the one!
JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY
The Democrats will try to filibuster the Medicare bill today .... if, that
is, they have the 60 votes they need to pull it off.
There is much about this bill to not like. It is strictly a vote-buying
grab by politicians. The Gimme Generation wants their prescription drugs
paid for by somebody else, and the politicians know that the Gimme Generation
votes. So .. give the oldsters what they want. We're told it will be
$400 billion over the next ten years .. but there is absolutely nothing in the
bill that limits this spending to $400 billion. It will almost certainly
be $600 billion and could easily approach twice the original estimates.
Let's address the Democrat's threatened filibuster. There is only one
reason the Democrats want this bill to fail, and that is because it
provides for private sector competition with Medicare; not now, but in about six
years. Democrats absolutely hate the idea of private sector competition
with any government program. That is why Democrats have been working so
hard to kill a voucher system for the abysmal Washington DC government schools.
Democrats know that with every program government controls comes millions of
Americans .. and that means controlling millions of American votes. The
two biggest vote-controlling programs out there are Social Security and
Medicare. For every American that leaves the government operated Medicare
program for a private sector option the Democrats see a vote lost.
So ... an attempt at a filibuster.
Remember ... always remember ... Democrats think America is great
because of government. Freedom and economic liberty have nothing to do
with it.
WHOOP! THERE SHE IS!
When the charges were brought against Michael Jackson earlier this week I
pointed out that at least we would stop hearing so much about Scott Peterson for
a while. I then wondered what Gloria Allred was going to do? All
this time Gloria has been grabbing face time on television as the attorney for
the little blond haystack that Scott was messin' with around the time of his
wife's disappearance.
Well ... wonder no more. Now that the Scott Peterson matter is on the
back burner Gloria has found a way to push herself in front of the cameras in
the Michael Jackson situation. There she is, in all her Gloria, Allred
demanding that California child welfare authorities remove Jackson's three
children from his custody because of the child molestation charges.
This is just Gloria Allred being Gloria Allred.
For quite a few years in the 1980's I served on the Board of Directors of an
organization called The National Association of Radio Talk Show Hosts (NARTSH).
Gloria Allred was one of my fellow board members. In the NARTSH
organization there was a running joke about Allred's endless quest for
publicity. Every year we would present a Freedom of Speech award to an
individual, and every year we would plead with Gloria Allred not to make a
spectacle of our awards ceremony with some ridiculous demonstration. Every
year Allred would ignore our pleas and find some reason to prance around the
awards ceremony waving a sign and shouting some type of slogan.
It just comes naturally, I guess. Allred is a pure publicity hound. Now
if she were a male I could get away with calling her a publicity whore ... but
we do have to deal with the demands of political correctness, don't we? Perhaps
just publicity bore would do.
AND SPEAKING OF PUBLICITY WHORES ...
Guess who is now trying to weasel himself into the Jesse Jackson case?
Yeah, that pathetic has-been washed-up race warlord Jesse Jackson is speaking
out. He's talking about an "invasion" of Michael Jackson's home, and
claiming that the home was "ransacked." He called the police operation a
"seize and destroy" operation. He even found a way to compare Michael
Jackson's situation with that of Rush Limbaugh!
When is the media just going to let this weary discredited warlord go off
somewhere to a well-deserved obscurity?
MAKE US TAX EXEMPT
Did you know that there was an effort afoot to exempt government school
teachers from federal income taxes? Several years ago California's
then-governor Grey Davis proposed making California teachers exempt from the
state income tax. Over the past few years there have even been
suggestions that teachers nationwide should be exempted from the payment of
federal income taxes.
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen is pushing for his idea of a "Leave
no Teacher Behind Act." He thinks that we can increase the quality of
teachers by relieving them of the responsibility of paying federal
income taxes. He then suggests that we could even extend the exemption to
social workers!
Democrats have been working for years, with no small amount of help from
Republicans, to relieve their core constituency of the responsibility for the
payment of federal income taxes. The next step in the process will be to
take constituencies loyal to Democrats and just flat-out exempt them. A
good place to start would be the teachers .. teachers represented by the most
powerful union in America, the National Education Association. From that
point we can move to social workers who are largely government employees, and
then to other government workers. Just argue that these people are so
essential to the smooth and efficient operation of government, they provide such
wonderful services to us all, and they just don't make enough money. We
can just give them a raise by eliminating their taxes!
Hey! Why stop at income taxes! Why not make them exempt from
property taxes too! And they can all carry little cards that make them
exempt from sales taxes!
Give these politicians their way and the entire cost of government in this
country will soon be borne by about 15% of the achievers at the top of the
economic ladder. Maybe then Atlas will dump his load.
YEAH, YEAH, YEAH ... THE POLICE ALWAYS OVERREACT, DON'T THEY
Do you remember the violence and destruction that was brought to Seattle,
Washington in 1999 when anarchists and assorted anti-capitalists descended on
the World Trade Organization meeting? The city of Miami was determined
that the same type of violence and destruction was not going to take place there
last week during trade talks. The police were out in force to prevent the
demonstrators from doing what the demonstrators wanted to do ... destroy.
Now the demonstrators are whining. The naughty police overreacted.
Yeah, yeah. We've heard that before. How can you tell when police
overreact? When there are no riots and no destruction of private property,
that's how. In the anarchist's dictionary "police overreaction" is defined
as "any action taken by police which prevents protestors from destroying private
property and disrupting commerce."
One protestor says she was just standing there confronting the police and
waving a peace sign in the face of a police officer when WHAM! she got a club in
the puss. Wish I could have been there to see that.
JUST WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH PRE-EMPTIVE WARFARE
One of the principal problems that the appeasement class has with George Bush
and his war in Iraq is that it was pre-emptive. Evidently there is
something inherently evil in taking pre-emptive action.
Before we go any further with this let's sneak a peak at the dictionary.
Pre-emptive, is defined as:
- Relating to or constituting a military strike made so as to gain
the advantage when an enemy strike is believed to be imminent.
- Undertaken or initiated to deter or prevent an anticipated,
usually unpleasant situation or occurrence.
Now that you have some definitions to work with, does the idea of a
pre-emptive strike sound so horribly outrageous? If you actually believe
that an enemy strike is imminent, is it such a bad idea to strike first?
Or of you think someone will almost certainly do something particularly
unpleasant to you at some point in the future, is it so hideously wrong for you
to try to neutralize that person's ability to harm you before he acts?
Let's build a little scenario here using that diminutive gargoyle who
currently holds sway in North Korea. Kim Jung Il has a pretty loud
mouth; but he also has a powerful military to back up what he says. The
world believes him to be certifiable, and that's not good for the cause of peace
and stability.
Here's your scenario: Kim Jung Il launches a three-stage rocket over
Japan all the way to the equator in the middle of the pacific. At that
point the world, and the United States knows that Kim Jung Il has a missile that
could reach virtually any portion of the United States. The little
hedgehog then announces that in exactly 60 hours he is going to launch another
such missile aimed at Los Angeles, and this missile is going to be carrying a
nuclear warhead.
So, what would you "no pre-emptive war" idiots have us do at that point?
Common sense would suggest that we should send out the long-range U.S. bombers
to destroy as much of Kim Jung Il's military capability as possible ...
especially his nuclear and missile facilities.
But wait! That would be a pre-emptive strike, wouldn't it? We
just couldn't do that, could we? After all ... he hasn't attacked us!
How can we strike at him until he actually attacks us?
Now .. if that isn't enough to make you "no pre-emptive war" whackos hide
under your blankets, they you have lost all capabilities for logical thought.
But, then ... you're liberals, aren't you. It goes with the territory.
WE MAY BE COMMUNISTS AND ISLAMIC RADICALS .. BUT DON'T INVESTIGATE US!
The FBI is investigating the backgrounds and organizational methods of
antiwar demonstrators in the US. Hopefully that doesn't come as a surprise to
you. It is safe to assume that a large number of these demonstrators are
out there in the streets because they want America to fail in its efforts to
fight terrorism and its efforts to bring secular representative governments to
Iraq and Afghanistan. Translated: Many of these demonstrators are
pro-Saddam and anti-US. So, who wouldn't want them investigated by the
FBI?
The demonstrators, that's who. Now we have so-called "civil rights
advocates" and (God help us) "legal scholars" who are saying that these
investigations could signal a return to abuses directed against civil rights
protestors of the 1960's 70's.
Remember, as you've already learned, the organizers of the demonstrations
last week in London were largely anti-American communists and Islamic radicals.
So we're supposed to assume that all of the protestors in the United States are
Boy Scouts and volunteers at nursing homes?
Know your enemy .. and keep him close.
MISSILE STRIKE!
Did you see those pictures on television over the weekend? A
ground-to-air missile struck a cargo plane on approach to Baghdad International
Airport. You could see the airplane's wing on fire as it made its approach
and landed at the airport. The crew landed safely and nobody was hurt.
This attack was in Baghdad. How long before some Islamic goon gets one
of those missiles into this country and manages to hit an American airliner
departing or arriving at an American airport. Do you have any idea what
that would do to the American economy? Ask yourself ... if you heard of
200 passengers dying after a missile strikes a commercial airliner, how long
would it be before you flew anywhere? In order for the airlines to remain
in business they would have to immediately install devices designed to prevent a
missile strike ... at a cost of several million dollars per airplane. You
do know who would bear that cost, don't you? Hint .. it wouldn't be the
airline shareholders.
So .. why hasn't it happened in this country yet? Perhaps the main
reason is because our president has taken the fight to the Islamic terrorists,
instead of waiting for them to bring the fight back to us. Many of the
terrorists who have entered Iraq from Syria, Iran, Egypt and Saudi Arabia to
attack American troops there might well be looking for a way to get into the
United States to their damage here is they weren't otherwise occupied. The
war against Islamic terrorism must be fought. We tried appeasement
for eight years under Bill Clinton; you see what it brought us.
Two years ago most of you wouldn't have bet five bucks to win a thousand that
we wouldn't have another serious terrorist attack on our own soil by the end of
2003. Maybe you ought to sit back and give a few minutes thought to why we
have thus far avoided that second attack. One reason. It's because we
actually had a president in office on 9/11 who took his responsibility to
protect and defend our country seriously ... unlike some previous presidents we
could mention.
Today we learn that British intelligence MI-5 is currently tracking suicide
bombers in Britain. How confident are you that some suicide bombers aren't
trying to get into the United States right now? Remember ... our ability
to protect ourselves from these goons has been severely compromised in the US
because of our absurd and deadly adherence to the principles of political
correctness. Remember .. .no profiling! Look for weapons, not
terrorists.
Go on ... protest your buns off. Just remember, on one side we have
Americans who realize that, as Churchill said, it is sometimes better to fight
when victory is assured ... if you stick to it, that is .... then it is to wait
until victory is in doubt but it is better to fight than to live as slaves.
On the other side .. the side of the appease and protest side .. we have the
head of the British Communist Party, the head of the London Council of Mosques,
and great American heroes like Ted Kennedy, Barbra Streisand and Michael Moore.
EXPLOITING THE 9/11 ATTACKS
The Republican National Committee is running its first television ad of the
election season. This ad highlights the successes of Bush's war on terror.
It says that some people are attacking the president for attacking the
terrorists.
The ad is correct. Bush has done a good job .. and certainly a much better
job than Clinton ... of taking the fight to the terrorists. And throughout
the campaign the Democrats have been slamming and criticizing Bush for his
policies. Weasely Clark is is just one of the Democratic candidates
calling for Bush to remove those ads immediately.
Now that the ad is running the Democrats are outraged!
"How dare the president run an ad citing his accomplishments. He's
just exploiting the 9/11 terrorist attacks against Americans! Oh, sure ..
it's OK if we run advertisements and make statements in opposition to Bush's war
in Iraq, because when we do that we're not exploiting 9/11. But if the
Republicans run any ads saying the president is actually doing the right thing
then that IS exploiting the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and they should stop it
immediately!"
The truly pathetic thing here is the fact that some government-"educated"
Americans will hear the Democrat's protests and actually agree with them!
How do these people survive?
THANK YOU SOUTHERN ILLINOIS!
Newsradio WJPF, 1020 and
1340 AM, recently polled their listeners with the question "Which weekday
Newsradio WJPF program do you consider a "DO NOT MISS?" Here are the
results:
8% Coast to Coast AM
20% Morning Newswatch
17% Neal Boortz
15% Rush Limbaugh
13% Sean Hannity
10% Bill O'Reilly
3% Michael Savage
13% Michael Regan
I'll take second place to a great morning news show any
day! Thank you folks. Every time I see something like this it just
makes me more eager to get back into the studio the next day and pick up where I
left off.
This is what happens when people let their ill-behaved brats run loose at airports.
READING ASSIGNMENTS
First the economy .. now this. Bush-haters predicted that his trip to
Britain would be a disaster.
They were wrong. As the caddy said to me after I hit a 225 yard five
iron to the green: "Now that ought to silence the critics."
Vigils for a child molester? Yup, fans around the world are holding
candlelight
vigils for Michael Jackson. One 37-year-old Parisian said he (yes,
"he") hadn't been able to sleep or eat for three days. Where do nut-cases like
this come from? Oh yeah ... France.
Have we had a president lately who didn't have a family member who managed
somehow to embarrass him? We had Billy Carter and Billy Beer, Roger Clinton ...
and now
Neil Bush?
How about some light reading for a Monday morning ....
Michael Jackson's
love letters to his young male friend.
Read where congress is spending some of those oh-so-badly needed anti-terrorism
funds. How about janitorial services, leather jackets, and a
politically popular jobs program!
Looks like they're
missing
some explosives from the Newark (pronounced "nerk") airport.,
If John Allen Muhammad gets the death penalty you can expect to see him
Tango
Uniform in about three years. That's still too damned long.
There's no reason death penalties can't be carried out in 90 says ... tops.
You'll love this one. Leftist protestors show up for their annual,
semi-annual, or whatever protest against a military school at Ft. Benning,
Georgia. They've been doing this for 14 years. This time the Army
had set up loudspeakers about 50 yards away from where the protestors were
speaking. Now the protestors are threatening to sue the Army for launching
a "psychological operation" against the protestors. So ...
what was the Army
playing over those loudspeakers?
Generation "Y" ..
the thankless generation.
It's cellphone independence day!
|