advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat

GOTTA GET THE BLACKS STIRRED UP ...

By
Neal Boortz
@ July 14, 2010 8:04 AM Permalink | Comments (85) | TrackBacks (0)

You've probably heard by now that the NAACP has formally accused the tea parties of racism. The resolution .. debated behind closed doors at the convention .. "calls on the tea party and all people of good will to repudiate the racist element and activities within the tea party,".

OK ... let me 'splain this to you. It's really not all that hard. So easy to understand, in fact, that a government education should be all you need to "get it."

The Community Organizer is in trouble, and he's dragging down the Democrat Socialist party with him. Even Obama's chief mouthpiece is suggesting that the Republicans might take control of the house in the November elections. Independents are bailing on Obama as they come to realize the damage he's not only done to our economy .. but to the economic futures of our children and grandchildren.

It's time for damage control. Time to head to the solid and dependable Democrat voter base and get them energized. And just who are those solid and dependable Democrat voters? Union workers and blacks. So now we find Obama's travels putting an emphasis on speeches to and photo ops with union workers. While Obama concentrates on the unions, the NAACP is working on the black voters. The tactic is simple and effective. Scream racism. Put the race pimps on horseback and run them up and down the urban streets shouting "The racists are coming! The racists are coming!"

I suppose this is going to work to some extent. Just as there are wizened citizens who will buy that "if you vote for Republicans they're going to take away your Social Security" nonsense; there are surely blacks that will now rush to the polls in November to turn back the "racists." The left has a problem though. They have so overused the "racism" word that most people in this country - and many blacks - now consider the word to have little serious meaning. The real-world working definition of the word "racist" now would read something like this: "Any action or utterance seen as opposing any belief or position held by a person who is not a member of the Caucasian race."

The NAACP and Obama dog washers of various stripes are going to find out that black Americans worry about the futures of their children the same way white Americans do, and they recognize that the massive debt we are incurring under Obama's rule will ultimately condemn their children to a life of servitude to government.

By the way ... the NAACP cited this urban legend about all of those tea partiers shouting epithets and racial insults at black members of congress back during the ObamaCare drama. You do realize that there are no audio or video recordings out there which support this myth, don't you? Well ... you are now.

Categories:

Tags:

Main Index | Archives | RSS feed

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: GOTTA GET THE BLACKS STIRRED UP ....

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/80837

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • content of character
    M.L.K. Jr's statement needs revision.
    When he uttered that we should judge people by the content of their character, he did not realize that this too is problematic. When we do this, we harbour certain implicit biases against those whom we judge or are about to judge when it comes time to judging. The implicit biases lay dormant, and the moment we hear or see something about the Other that we might not agree with, speaks volumes about our own prejudices about the Other, and not about the faults of the person whom we are judging.
    The answer lies within ourselves, and our own ability to depress our own biases and practice self-relfection about how we judge the Other, and never - ever judge someone based on a single episode, or what M.L.K. Jr. considered the content of one's character. We should learn the Other, and how and why tey reach decisions, or why they have different view points. We should never judge them.
    By Daniel @ 08/01/10 09:28:40 PMreport abuse
  • Well Thomas, in that context
    ...then both my marriage and your perspective on this bill are horribly flawed.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/22/10 07:48:13 AMreport abuse
  • lol
    "I never considered it a failure"

    Sure thing Xiappa. Just like I don't consider this bill a bad thing either.
    By Thomas @ 07/21/10 03:46:44 PMreport abuse
  • I never considered it a failure
    As a matter of fact, 8 good years together, 2 great kids, still have a good friend in the Ex...nope I consider that mission success. Now, I will admit that the original "Till death do us part" plan went to hell, but consider the options and the results. Emotional problems, possibilities for infidelity, extended stress on the kids, potential for domestic violence, angst and anger, fights and continual arguing. What success would there be in that? One could argue that we never should have been married; and she was forewarned about my lifestyle as I was about her ambitions. But then we never would have shared the great years that we had; never had that life experience. The divorce was a transition...in one unit I worked in its called "mission change".

    I am not discounting the unforeseen events that affect peoples lives. "Murphy" does exist. But I have seen time and again, that Murphy can be sidelined more often than not. Are there exigent circumstances that happen to those who dont deserve such a fate...yes. But they represent a horribly small sample of debtors who use such safety nets as bail out plans. I know of several folks who have gone through bankruptcy and within 2 to 4 years were back in the saddle; all without a government handout or hand up or protection from Washington DC.
    I just see this as another means to dismember American character; another means of eviscerating Constitutional restrictions on the FEDGOV; another means of saying "dont worry about screwing up...we're from the Government...we're here to help"
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/21/10 08:35:44 AMreport abuse
  • Xiappa
    People are in charge of their lives yes, but as evidence to things that go awry, I still have to use the example of your marriage. Things in life don't exactly work out the way you plan sometimes. Weird stuff happens. People get in debt, a lot of through faults of their own, I will concede to that. Yet, conservatives love to tout "personal responsibility" and then makes excuses for the responsibility's in their lives which fail. You "tried" you say, and yet, it still failed. I just wish you could extend these "extenuating circumstances" and apply them to other peoples situations to fulfill my point things are not so simple in life.
    By Thomas @ 07/20/10 08:32:13 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas
    Your entire premise is based on "people are not in charge of their lives"...to that I must call bullshit. One's simple use of prudence, patience and personal common sense is what will keep folks out from under the boots of "predatory" companies, scammers, malcontents and other credit ne'erdowells when it comes to finance. Simple rules like "If I cant afford it, I cant buy it" or "If I save for it I can buy it later" come into play.
    If you believe that "These measures are in place to protect these people and to help them at least begin to repay what they owe" then you are naive. The vast majority of folks who end up needing some sort of "bail out" pay back an average of 18% of principal and 43% of total owed interest. In the end, whatever retailer, creditor or whomever lent that person money to purchase, is out the money they are owed. Some may argue, "but they should not have lent money to those bad debtors to begin with". True, but most lenders only can only go on the publicly available information on someones "credit score" and past usage. There are many folks who are able to scam that system or cover their tracks or even commit outright fraud. The effect cascades and when you inject governmental interference, tax payers foot the bill.

    They Get What They Deserve. Bottom line, if you cannot pay, then dont play. Learn to say "no, I dont need that today"

    As far as a "low blow" I take no offense. The dissolution was her choice based on the fact that her professional goals changed and she could not handle my lifestyle in the military. Very high stress and too many sleepless nights alone. We parted as, and remain to this day, very good friends...no contention. I worked very hard to make our marriage successful, she simply decided to opt out.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/20/10 08:41:50 AMreport abuse
  • Xiappa. CCBOR
    "I have had two credit cards in the last 30 years; never maxed them, always paid them off within two payment cycles and never had my rates raised more than 2%."

    Good for you! Seems like you are no stranger to fiscal responsibility. But let's get one thing straight. That does not everyone else in the world is. I'm sorry, but the "they get what they deserve" attitude does not fix the problem. Especially when it comes to predatory lenders and CC companies taking advantage of their consumers and spiraling them in a perpetual debt they cannot climb out from. You may have done the "right thing" your whole life, but that simply is not the reality we live in. People make mistakes, and people get into debt. You are all high and mighty now, but a simple string of bad luck can get you in quite a fix with CC companies. These measures are in place to protect these people and to help them at least begin to repay what they owe. The world isn't black and white Xiappa. I dont want this to come across as a low blow, but you mentioned you were married once. What happened? You were supposed to be married your WHOLE life, till death due part, remember? I say this to illustrate you are not infallible. You know personally that life is not black and white, things happen, and you should take this into account when you say things like "they get what they deserve." You have no say in what they deserve.
    By Thomas @ 07/16/10 07:54:50 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas
    First, I am ecstatic that Obama feels that he must keep the funding going to the VA. I never said he should not. Where I have concerns is the VA track record of fraud waste and abuse and his exponential increase in discretionary spending for entitlements leave even more room for mischief.

    Second, I did not back away from the CCBOR...very bad move; there is no benefit. What the CCBOR covers any prudent customer can take care of by reading credit agreements, watching their spending habits, and paying down their balances. I have had two credit cards in the last 30 years; never maxed them, always paid them off within two payment cycles and never had my rates raised more than 2%. Too many start running the bricks on credit cards and cannot figure out why they are in debt to their ears and the lenders are having to crank the screws to recoup some of the money they are owned under a prescribed agreement. That just shows that users is willing to abrogate their personal responsibility. They get what they deserve.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/16/10 03:48:36 PMreport abuse
  • xiappa
    Ah, ok, I got your ex mixed up with what I thought I read.

    Anyway, seems like you know what you are talking about here having worked in the feild, however, I still contend this budget increase by Obama is a good thing for everyone though, even though you do not seem to think so.

    I noticed you backed away from my other good thing that Obamas done, so there we have that.
    By Thomas @ 07/16/10 02:11:48 PMreport abuse
  • Your Boortz Emails
    I may not always agree with you, Boortz, but I sure appreciate your stirring up the pot enough to make me think. Thankyou, Mr Boortz.
    By sheila Butler @ 07/16/10 10:04:34 AMreport abuse
  • "racist"
    I always thought that the "National Assoc. for the advancement of colored People" and the Association of Black Mayors or Governors sounded a bit racist to me. Am I wrong?
    By sheila Butler @ 07/16/10 10:00:07 AMreport abuse
  • Thomas, one last point
    "...as evidenced by your friend who said it's been hell for the past 8 years."

    No - what I said was "One of the benefits of having a former spouse who worked for the VA FOR 8 years..." She worked in the VA from 1989 to 1997. I volunteered in the VA from 1995 to 1998.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/16/10 09:34:40 AMreport abuse
  • Thomas, I will assume by the continuing vacuous responses that you have very little or zero experience in the realm of government funding and resourcing. I have nearly 30 years working within the system (23 years Army, 5 years as a DOD contractor) responsibilities ranging from forecasts to support range firing, to large scale acquisition programs. Yes, POM is a DoD vernacular but the other FEDGOV departments and agencies have the same thing…same horse, different saddle.
    The “two year” program referenced in the article is the two year spending plan submitted by DoD, DoE, TD, DoJ, and numerous other Federal Agencies. Specific to DoD, the article states that “U.S. military services and agencies must submit to senior Pentagon brass by July 30 their FIVE YEAR spending plans” The two year budgeting cycle is what is overlayed against approved funding for allocation. In other words, had you read my earlier descriptions, this covers the part where the purse-holders ask “how do you intend to spend this money (from a 5 year POM) that we will allocate for the next two years?”
    Single year budgets are nothing new. They are the requirements that Department leadership ask for every year; from the SECDEF down to a company commander; from the SECSTATE down to a ambassadorial desk in East Camelfart. It is a yearly means of accountability. No news here.
    “Scrapping” a five year plan has some merit, but I predict that the problems you will see will be exponential rises in non-programmed discretionary spending, also called the “end of year shopping spree” and significant increases in waste and abuse. This was the system that DoD specifically worked under in the 1970’s and 80’s. The five year POM was not a Rumsfeld baby. He was looking for a more cautious method to keep DoD projects alive and on track and making the project managers more beholden to the Nunn–McCurdy Provision of the 1983Defense Authorization Act.
    I think you need to review my 07/15/10 11:12:22 (One last item, Thomas ) response again. Using your own data link, if you look at the discretionary spending you will note AVERAGE increases of 1.77% per annum from 2002 to 2008 (Bush); and 1.66% from 2008-2011 (Obama). The story is essentially the same in regard to AVERAGE entitlement spending with 6.01% in 2002-2008 and 5.5 in 2008-2011 respectively. By the numbers, Bush showed more interest in the VA than has Obama to date. You have not refuted any of the facts that I presented to you. Your entire premise seems to rest on “Bush Hates Soldiers, Obama Loves Them”, can you provide any substantive argument?
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/16/10 08:21:25 AMreport abuse
  • Xiappa
    Funding cycles? The only entity I found that had anything to do with a "pom" was the military. And everything I saw said it required a two year forecast not a three year one. Anyway, that system you are talking about is not in use anymore.

    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4588117

    Sorry, it's not "Bush Dollars." Bush and Co never really cared about the VA, as evidenced by your friend who said it's been hell for the past 8 years.
    By Thomas @ 07/15/10 07:15:42 PMreport abuse
  • Sorry SFCRet
    You fail to provide any substantial evidence of a correlation. Did you ask the woman why your rate went up? Just recently I had to call my CC company about an issue and when I didn't get an answer I liked, I asked for someone higher up till the issue was resolved. Did you do this? What was their justification for the rate increase? They have to provide you an answer. Did you get one?

    My advice? Just go with a new company that charges you the 4.99% apr. Or don't.
    By Thomas @ 07/15/10 07:00:57 PMreport abuse
  • Credit card bill of rights
    Sa'rnt...as you stated, there is no benefit. What the CCBOR covers any prudent customer can take care of by reading the agreements, watching their spending habits, and paying down their balances. Anything else is living in fantasyland or shows that the user is willing to abrogate their personal responsibility. They get what they deserve.

    I have had two credit cards in the last 30 years; never maxed them, always paid them off withing two payment cycles and never had my rates raised more than 2%.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/15/10 04:18:17 PMreport abuse
  • NAACP are racist -not Tea Parties
    Racism lingers with the black leaders who keep power by claiming racism rather than trying to help their membership better themselves. They are the worst of racist.
    By wil bowles @ 07/15/10 03:55:50 PMreport abuse
  • Credit card Bill of Rights.........what it did TO me....
    I have few cards, by choice. My FICO is close to 800 and my primary card had a 4.99% APR. After the bill passed, I got a letter telling me my APR was going to jump to 13.99% on Feb 1, 2010.

    I called the card company and was told "sorry, your only options are to accept the change or cancel the account and pay off the balance". The "customer service" person did express surprise my new rate was so low. Tells you something about other people rates, doesn't it?

    I don't frankly see much benefit to it.
    By SFCRet @ 07/15/10 03:23:26 PMreport abuse
  • Funding Cycles
    Thomas, the government uses a "POM" cycle of 5 years for budgets. You input spending requirements for a 3 year forecast and a 5 year allocation. What Obama has done is authorized the release of funds already approved. Now, the funds must be properly allocated to the correct MDEP (Management Decision Execution Package) for disbursement.
    In short, the 2011 money is "Bush Dollars"; the funding approved by Obama will not be available until 2013 or 2016.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/15/10 11:47:58 AMreport abuse
  • Please see my entry below
    @ 07/15/10 11:12:22 AM actually answers your last comments.
    One of the benefits of having a former spouse who worked for the VA for 8 years, and having significant exposure to the good, the bad and the ugly as a volunteer, I see the dark underside of the VA. It is one of the worst offenders of government fraud waste and abuse that I have seen. Like welfare, we keep throwing more money at it and it does little or no good. I would prefer seeing VA provide guidelines and policy oversight and let states run veterans services.

    In truth, both Bush and Obama are pretty much neck and neck in their funding for VA. All presidents toe the "support the veteran" line. And while I like to see more funding, the VA needs to clean up its act and get back on track (are you listening, Eric?).

    I have more faith in the Wounded Warriors Project and the Special Operations Warrior Foundation.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/15/10 11:36:01 AMreport abuse
  • Xiappa
    "The 2011 spending targets that you laud were actually POM’d and programmed in 2006, and approved by President Bush."

    You are not exactly presenting the whole truth here, the link is VA Budget numbers for the past decade and for 2011, so of course it's going to include spending approved by Bush.

    Perhaps that HVRP program will be able to see the light of day now, and as far as Obama maintaining the status quo you are just being pessimistic for the sake of trying to bad mouth Obama. He has increased the budget, and now these monies can be used for new VA hospitals and Clinics as well as upgrading the current ones, and also upgrading and adding new national cemeteries etc etc.
    By Thomas @ 07/15/10 11:27:39 AMreport abuse
  • I'm sorry Xiappa
    No one is throwing "money" at anything. Are you suggesting that Barack increasing the budget will actually NOT do anything? Do you have any sources to back up your claims that this extra cash will do "nothing." I'm calling bullshit. I think you are objecting simply for the sake of objecting. Obama has put in more to the VA than BUSH and CO ever did. Obama is actually trying to help out.

    Your credit card objection is pretty weak, even for you. Now I know you are objecting just for the sake of objecting.
    "Why on earth do we need this?" You ask. Well for one thing it prevents creditors from imposing arbitrary rate increases on customers, it prohibits most rate increases meant to penalize consumers for late payments on unrelated accounts, and it requires companies to post credit agreements on the Internet, among other things. Personal responsibility has nothing to do with it so stop presenting that fallacy. Even if it did it's quite interesting you are for throwing those people to the curb. Classic republican thinking. This is a major step in helping out the consumers Xiappa, and another good thing Obama has done.
    By Thomas @ 07/15/10 11:15:25 AMreport abuse
  • One last item, Thomas
    The 2011 spending targets that you laud were actually POM’d and programmed in 2006, and approved by President Bush. Are you familiar with the proposals to reduce homeless veterans? Homeless Veterans' Reintegration Program (HVRP) was introduced by Rep. John Boozman. It passed the House on Mar 31, 2009, was received in the Senate and read twice but then referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs. It has been under review by the VA since August of 2009. This legislation reauthorizes the VA programs for “job training, counseling, and placement services to expedite the reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor force”. Note that it “reauthorizes”…meaning it is an extension of existing legislation that first went into effect under the Department of Labor in 1988. In your link, please note that all the other “High Priority Performance Goals” deal with administrative systems, automation, electronic record systems (the VA has had three in the past 12 years), “relationship management” – meaning more bureaucracy. If you look at the discretionary spending you will note average increases of 1.77% per annum from 2002 to 2008; and 1.66% from 2008-2011. The story is essentially the same in regard to entitlement spending with 6.01% in 2002 and 5.5 in 2008-2011 respectively.
    So, in reality the Obama is maintaining the status quo where it really counts.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/15/10 11:12:22 AMreport abuse
  • Thank you Don!
    Keep on reading! I know you just can't help it. You see I know this because you took the time to try and make a coherent rant about how you really don't care. LOL, jokes on you retard. Oh, and it's "when" not "wend" and "does" not "dose". Jesus, you really got the short end of the gene pool stick, didn't you? Perfect tool for Neal Boortz radio though!
    By Thomas @ 07/15/10 10:53:19 AMreport abuse
  • A credit card bill of rights?
    Why on earth do we need this? Simple personal responsibility with one's credit will prevent 95% of any problem. Those who need government protection from credit card companies should not have a credit card to begin with.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/15/10 10:30:12 AMreport abuse
  • Thomas, throwing money at a problem does not always result in net postitives
    The increase in funding is actually a "proposed" increase in budgetary allocation to meet projected requirements. The problem with Government funding is first you tell the budget folks how much you need (and supposedly, why), then they tell you how much they can possibly provide (authorization); then you figure out how much you might get (appropriation) and finally how much you really do receive (allocation). The inherent problem with the VA is that the organization is horribly inefficient and forecasts (best guesses) go well and above what they are actually allocated. When funds are allocated, priorities in disbursement often change within the organization. For example, instead of building a new clinic or providing upgrades to an existing center, they might hire more personnel.

    For the record, the biggest "fraud, waste and abuse" of VA funding happens in the various programs supporting entitlements. VA Loans for example, provide for a certain amount in payment to a lender in the event of borrower default. The VA will try to recover lost funds but the means of preventing that is way too easy. And when action is taken, it is specifically for the VA benefit, not the borrower or bank. Where the VA needs to be more effective is in service connected medical conditions. Far too many clinics, hospitals et al are wallowing in bureaucracy, understaffed with qualified personnel, or the infrastructure and technology is wasting away. Many times veterans are forced to seek care outside of the normal VA channels. The VA is a horrendous bureaucracy and well over 48% of its budget is wasted. They, like too many other government institutions have become bloated and focus on self-sustainment rather than taking care of veterans.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/15/10 10:27:35 AMreport abuse
  • something good about obamanmading dong
    @ thomas I go to the very bottom so the frist thing that I see is the name of the poster and wend I see your name and others I just go to the next post. I will not waste my time reading anything you post and Big Joe and Ace the only thing good about barry is he his half white and he dose his best to hide it.
    By Don @ 07/14/10 09:41:44 PMreport abuse
  • Jesse Jackson in disguise
    What you're witnessing is a president, who during the campaign promised to bring people together, suddenly turn into a Jesse Jackson race baiter. He's doing this to rally the black and hispanic vote, but by doing so he's angering the folks who actually got him elected. Who is advising this guy anyway?
    By Robert @ 07/14/10 09:28:58 PMreport abuse
  • Anyway, just for S&G, here's another thing Obama's done that's good.
    Establish a credit card bill of rights

    The credit card bill of rights "bans unilateral changes ... apply interest rate increases only to future debt ... prohibit interest on fees ... prohibit 'universal defaults' (whereby a credit card raises its rates because the consumer was late paying a different creditor ... require prompt and fair crediting of cardholder payments."

    But hey, just ignore this as well Beer, and you will be just like Big Doh.
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 05:05:12 PMreport abuse
  • @Big Doh, Xiappa, and Beer
    Xiappa, when President Obama took office the budget of the Veterans Administration was 90 billion annually. That included 44.9 billion for entitlements both educational and compensation for service connected medical conditions. By next year this amount will be 64.7 billion for the same budget items, educational benefits and service connected compensation. A nearly 40% increase in just a few short years. Hope this helps out with your VA problem.

    But this is a good thing Obama has done.

    @Joe, what do you have against the veterans again Joe? You knew I was talking about them the whole time because you said, "Stop badmouthing our troops." Why would you say that if you thought I was talking about Virginia? You brought out a laugh in me though, acting like you just realized what I was talking about. Haven't seen that kind of moronic backtracking since I was a kid. I guess you forgot people could still see your comment history.

    Ok Joe, answer the question. Why did you call them "rat theives"?

    @Beer, you said, "Then he tries to claim the moral high ground by telling you to dig through several postings in the archives to find his elusive answer instead of just simply repeating his answer for all to see."

    The answer was originally quite long, and I'm not going to waste my time repeating it over and over like I already have three times just so Big Joe can say that I never answered the question, like he's done, each time. It's a nice tactic used by ACE,er Big Joe. Just ignore what I wrote, and claim that I never said it. The answer is there for all to see, I'm not going to do your work for you.

    Just today, I mentioned a good thing that Obama has done which was he increased the budget for the VA, but somehow, according to Big Dopehead, that didn't count. He must have something against the veterans. It's ridiculous to even continue trying to answer him at that point. He's just trolling, and not interested in learning. If people are too stupid to comprehend pursuing the archives for my answer, then so be it. It's their problem. But we all know him and his alter ego ACE are just being intentionally obtuse.
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 04:55:51 PMreport abuse
  • Racist!
    Call me a racist.
    I'll call you an authoritarian socialist tool.
    By Sammy @ 07/14/10 04:16:33 PMreport abuse
  • This delusionals ice-smoker named Thomas
    keeps saying he answered my question, but he never does.

    All I axed him was to name me somethin good about ole Soetoro.

    He can't do it.

    barrysoetoro.com
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 03:53:35 PMreport abuse
  • What do you have against the VA?
    Their horrendous inefficiency and bureaucratic ineptitude, for what it is worth. I am still hoping Gen. Shinseki will provide some modicum of effective leadership but he has a large mess to clean; going a long way back.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/14/10 03:51:49 PMreport abuse
  • damn, Thomas.....you got me!
    This whole time I thought you were talking about the state of VA(Virginia)!

    Well now that explains everything!

    Jeeeeez, No wonder it sounded like I was badmouthing our troops. Nope. I have military family members and friends. Four of them and a few who are no longer with us.

    GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS!

    Nobody in this country gets more respect from me than the good men and women who serve in our military. they are the greatest!
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 03:47:16 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas: Just tell us something good that Obama has done for this country – wrecking the economy and inviting attack from our enemies doesn't count BTW.
    ..
    By ACE @ 07/14/10 03:46:50 PMreport abuse
  • Still waiting, Thomas!
    What's your theory on the driver? Is he gay or straight?

    Why are you dodging the question?
    By stepcousin @ 07/14/10 03:46:16 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas and Big Joe's question...
    If he did answer Big Joe's question, I guess Thomas has amongst himself and the voices in his head that his answers aren't important enough to repeat since we all apparently missed it the first time he allegedly said it. That should give you a clue as to how ridiculous the answer probably was in the first place.

    Then he tries to claim the moral high ground by telling you to dig through several postings in the archives to find his elusive answer instead of just simply repeating his answer for all to see. He some how assumes that everybody that posts on this site has as much time on their hands as he apparently does to dig through days, if not weeks or archives. You see, he still lives at home with his mom and is essentially unemployed. So he has nothing better to do than sleep in late and then posting and digging through archives on Neal’s site. He fails to realize that most of us better things to do than digging through archives.

    Oh, but it gets better… if you find yourself in a position where he disagrees with you, the almighty and wise Thomas simply calls you stupid or accuses of being a racist or a homophobe or something. That or else he tries to call you gay in retaliation to you calling him gay first. I find it interesting the liberals like Thomas don’t like you referring to something you dislike as “gay” because it insults gay people, but it’s alright them to call you “gay” to insult you…

    Anyway… we must all wise up and learn that regardless of the evidence and facts of the being discussed, you automatically lose the argument the moment Thomas calls you stupid and/or accuses you of being a racist or gay/homophobe.

    That’s his ace in the hole. He will be a very successful lawyer someday with that tactic, you just wait and see!!
    By Free Beer & Hotwings @ 07/14/10 03:45:04 PMreport abuse
  • Again, 'Thomas' You should be able to simply look back thought your own comments and find it.
    Now, why can't you do that?
    By ACE @ 07/14/10 03:43:14 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas
    “Oh, and just off the top of my head, Obama is doing wonders with the Veterans, making sure they have good programs waiting for them when they get back home. “
    Thomas, I am curious. Exactly what wonders? His new program for Veterans with PTSD? That was initiated under the previous administration and even Bill Clinton had a policy in place back during his tenure. Increased funding does not necessarily mean correct allocation of said funds under the VA MDEP.
    His voucher program for homeless Vets? That was Gen. Shinseki’s plan to expand the already existing HUD-VASH Program.
    Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act? That is nothing more than a bill to amend Title 38, USC in order to authorize advance appropriations for certain medical care accounts supporting veterans; he is authorizing an already planned expansion of an existing program as part of the presidential budget proposal. Every Prez to date does this.
    Do you mean his Aug 2009 launch of an update to the old GI Bill? Obama has done little more than every other president before him. Allocating funds is easy, getting those funds into the right coffers for disbursement is a different story.
    By Xiappa Majex @ 07/14/10 03:43:08 PMreport abuse
  • Typical of 'Thomas' he projects what he does and then DODGES THE QUESTION. After several cycles of this tiresome game, he switches over to the “You're repeating yourself gambit”
    Again, why can't you come up with one Positive thing that Obama has done for this country.

    (Looking forward to you continued dodging of all of our questions)
    By ACE @ 07/14/10 03:41:28 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas, look at what you say...
    so, from 44.9 billion to 64.7 billion in 12 months? This is "good"? Okay, and what do the numbers look like the next year after that. Then the next year? then the next?

    It's failed mathematics, Thomas. get a calculator. Ain't gonna work. It's a fantasyland dream your types have. See you in the soup lines.

    And you same little bastards, for EIGHT YEARS, stomped around protesting and demanded something be done about "BUSH'S OUT-OF-CONTROL -GOVERNMENT-SPENDING!? What do you call this?

    And now you all-of-a-sudden have feeelings and emotions and concern for the very people you called "baby killers" and "right-wing domestic terrorists" and "teabaggers"?

    Stop badmouthing our troops.

    Vermin.

    Now are you gonna tell us something good about Soetoro or not??! Damn boy.
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 03:39:52 PMreport abuse
  • Still waiting Big Joe!
    What do you have against the VA?

    I have already answered your question about Obama, now it's my turn. Why keep dodging?
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 03:25:48 PMreport abuse
  • NOTW changes back to ACE
    Ok ACE or Joe I will ask you the same thing...

    What do you have against the VA ACE?
    What do you have against their budget going up to better help our veterans get back on their feet after coming home from war?

    Why did you call them "rat theives?"
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 03:24:35 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas and Big Joe
    You're not gay if you're doing the driving. Right, "Big" Joe? ;)
    By stepcousin @ 07/14/10 03:20:59 PMreport abuse
  • Big Joe Williams : "Anything actually good about obama that you can name?" Thomas: “Already have. “
    Maybe Thomas you can enlighten us all and tell us what that is?

    Just tell us something good that Obama has done for this country – wrecking the economy and inviting attack from our enemies doesn't count BTW.

    You should be able to simply look back thought your own comments and find it, maybe just post a link to it.

    That is, IF you actually did that as you claim....
    By ACE @ 07/14/10 03:15:06 PMreport abuse
  • What do you have against the VA Big Joe?
    What do you have against their budget going up to better help our veterans get back on their feet after coming home from war?

    Why did you call them "rat theives?"
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 03:02:21 PMreport abuse
  • oh, and another thing... Stepcousin and Big Doh
    You two keep touting your homosexuality around for all to see and you might just confuse everyone. Keep your desires to yourselves boys.
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 02:54:53 PMreport abuse
  • Big doh, are you really so obtuse?
    "So he increased their budget for ENTITLEMENTS? How is that "good"?"

    Are you saying education is not good? Are you saying that our men and women should not be able to get a good education after they are done with the service? INteresting, I thought you would be all for that incentive to join up.
    You have a problem with veterans being entitled to medical help? Wow Big Doh. Who knew you were really so anti military.

    "Yep, the ole entitlement mentality. That's the very thing that is destroying our country."

    Either you are intentionally being obtuse, or you really are the most stupid person on Neals site other than ACE and Joyce. Actually, I know you are ACE, your mannerisms are practically the same.

    "Cause one day in the very near future the government will have no money to give these rat thieves their "entitlements"

    You realize you just called the VA "rat thieves." Right? God, you keep digging that ditch there moron! LOL!

    "Anything actually good about obama that you can name?"

    Already have. Which you your failure to discredit is now complete.

    Since I have answered your question, why dont you answer mine. What do you have against the VA getting more benefits for our wounded and needy soldiers? What do you have against the VA?
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 02:51:05 PMreport abuse
  • Sorry Butt Neckid,
    But my momma say I needz to git wit d'program and stop tawkin to dem white devils. It's all they fault anyway. Ain't no white person got no sense. Dey all just racist neoconz.
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 02:31:24 PMreport abuse
  • ?
    "I'm done with your sorry butt" - Thomas

    Careful now, Thomas. Others on this blogsite may think we're a gay couple having an argument!
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 02:29:08 PMreport abuse
  • Thomas
    Two snaps! So, you're done with Big Joe's sorry butt, eh? I figured it would be the other way around, you silly goose.
    By stepcousin @ 07/14/10 02:22:23 PMreport abuse
  • hey Thomas, who's gonna pay for all this $H!+?
    You brag about obama doing good by increasing entitlements(dependency on government)? Who's gonna pay for it all? You? People who actually work and are already paying half their paychecks in taxes? Taxes will have to be increased. Means more people will lose jobs. Who's gonna pay for their entitlements? See where this is going? A depression in the making. This will collapse our economy. Everyone sitting around on their fat, lazy A$$es waiting around for the government to give them their entitlements while fewer and fewer people are working to pay for it all.

    Yesterday, did you really say you got your news from the Comedy Channel's Daily Show with John Stewart?!

    Thomas, damnit, I axed you to tell me something GOOD about Barry Soetoro. Why cannot you do this simple task? I've been asking you for over 3 weeks.

    Budget increases and entitlements is a detriment to our economy. Especially during a recession.

    Do you support slavery?
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 02:20:17 PMreport abuse
  • damn you white folks........
    you dumbass redneckinbredhillbillys....it's C R A C K A.....not cracker....if'n yous gunna be racist do it right!!!!

    GO jr..........
    By butt neckid @ 07/14/10 02:15:37 PMreport abuse
  • Thanks again Thomas!
    So he increased their budget for ENTITLEMENTS?

    How is that "good"?

    Yep, the ole entitlement mentality. That's the very thing that is destroying our country.

    And people like you say this is "good"?

    That's okay, Thomas. Cause one day in the very near future the government will have no money to give these rat thieves their "entitlements"

    Anything actually good about obama that you can name?
    Still haven't done that yet Thomas.

    But thanks for pointing out more of the bad things obama has done. He's getting people like you to surrender your rights for "entitlements". You cheap slut.
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 02:08:19 PMreport abuse
  • Hey Big Doh
    Since you've been dodging me from day to day after I answer your question, I thought I would go ahead and put it here for all to see so you can't deny you ever saw it like you ave been doing. Here's one random good thing about Obama:

    The VA. He's increased their budget 40% from 44.9 billion for entitlements both educational and compensation for service connected medical conditions. By next year this amount will be 64.7 billion for the same budget items, educational benefits and service connected compensation.to take better care of our troops.

    http://www4.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2011_Fast_Facts_VA_Budget_Highlights.pdf

    So are you going to deny that you saw this to Joe? LOL, why not? It's all you've got now anyway. You pathetic waste of a man. I'm done with your sorry butt.
    By Thomas @ 07/14/10 01:44:10 PMreport abuse
  • Racism?
    When Obama was elected President he was supposed to be, and could have been, the one to finally bring black and white together. But he and his minions have done more to fan the flames of racisms than any president in the last 100 years!
    By Gregg @ 07/14/10 01:39:23 PMreport abuse
  • Grievance palooza
    Do libtards actually believe we should just ignore the black criminal, and hope that by showing understanding of the plight their forefathers, that they will decide to participate in civilized behavior, and give up their lives of crime? Bwaaahahahahahaha!

    When will they stop making excuses for the criminal elements within their community? Probably never, since to deny them, is to deny themselves.
    By $mooth Operator @ 07/14/10 01:37:32 PMreport abuse
  • scrait up i'm a racist
    i don't like obama cause he got a white momma.
    By wutdatsmaellahk @ 07/14/10 01:00:11 PMreport abuse
  • Just remember...
    During the civil rights marches, their motto was "we shall overcome" they have never been about equality or fairness. They want to be superior.
    By Greg P. @ 07/14/10 12:49:30 PMreport abuse
  • On What Date
    Did the NAACP pass a resolution conemning rap artists and the Black Panther Party as being racist? Anyone know??
    By kevin @ 07/14/10 12:47:35 PMreport abuse
  • Corrections on MLK Jr's quotations
    "...sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual: 'Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'"

    "We who in engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive."

    "The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character - that is the goal of true education."

    "We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now."

    "The time is always right to do what is right."

    "Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think."

    "Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal."
    By Akat @ 07/14/10 12:37:33 PMreport abuse
  • da trufe
    Americans are not big fans of the NAACP. It's just politically incorrect to speak out against it, but everybody knows it's a race-baiting, victim-loving, white-hating, handout-taking group of worthless losers.
    By stepcousin @ 07/14/10 12:34:06 PMreport abuse
  • How nice for Obama
    Oh this is such a sweet situation for Obama - couldn't have played out better if he had tried. If the Dems keep majorities in both houses, he maintains his majorities to ram whatever legislation he chooses down our throats, but even if the Dems lose control of both houses, if any of his policies fail, he can blame the obstructionist Republican congress for not allowing the Dems to pass effective legislation.
    By Rob @ 07/14/10 12:30:42 PMreport abuse
  • megatron
    Thank you for settling the question of whether or not tea partiers are racist or not. If it had been anybody other than you, I would have required some sort of proof.
    By stepcousin @ 07/14/10 12:24:20 PMreport abuse
  • Negrophile,
    Black people CAN do what ever they want...........so long as they don't deprive any other citizen of their rights to life, liberty or property.
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 12:07:39 PMreport abuse
  • Attack
    It's impossible for the Tea Party Movement to defend against an AARP resolution requiring it to condemn racism among it's members. That's kind of like asking a man when he stopped beating his wife.
    The only defense here is a strong offense.
    The Tea Party Movement should issue a resolution requesting the NAACP to renounce racism within their own organization.
    By Carlos @ 07/14/10 12:06:52 PMreport abuse
  • NAACP vs Tea Party
    The only racist about this is the NAACP which is by definition a racist organization.
    By Chris @ 07/14/10 12:04:24 PMreport abuse
  • End the racism nonsense.
    "FREE AT LAST! FREE AT LAST! GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY WE ARE FREE AT LAST!" - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

    "Judge a man not by the color of his skin...but by the content of his character" - Dr Martin Luther King Jr.


    The NAACP has become nothing more than a racial hate group that preaches intolerance and bigotry.
    By Big Joe Williams @ 07/14/10 11:59:34 AMreport abuse
  • Tea Baggers are Racist
    And thank you Captain Obvious.
    By Megatron @ 07/14/10 11:45:33 AMreport abuse
  • Tea party platform is 'Code Words'
    So yesterday Sean Hannity had on his show a black Pastor from Maryland and he asked point blank for the Pastor to show evidence of this racism.

    After all the deflection and mis-direction, the response he finally gave almost made me crash my car.

    According to this 'learned' Pastor, any demands for smaller government, less taxes and spending controls are all "code words" for racism, because supposedly those are the same things historically racists groups asked for.

    So this means that if you can ever find anyone in history that was a 'racist' and used the same words you are using, then by golly you just have to be a racist.

    Guess what folks, some of us are to the point of not caring whether you call us racists anymore or not. It has lost all meaning and impact.
    By Grandpa @ 07/14/10 11:44:54 AMreport abuse
  • Saw This Coming A Mile Away
    When Obama was elected I said that any opposition to him in any way, shape, or form was going to be touted as racism. Seems I was 100% correct.
    By Rockhound @ 07/14/10 11:40:31 AMreport abuse
  • Prove it?
    They don't have to prove it...they only have to say it because they know that the uninformed blacks will believe them. They lie to their own people...pretty sad actually.
    By Jeff @ 07/14/10 10:30:35 AMreport abuse
  • Easy problem to solve
    Let us show up at any rally or organized event dressed as an extremist element of said identity group and make sure to get ourselves on camera holding signs spouting "hate speech". this will invalidate any organized group whatsoever in this country. Time to start playing the game of the lefties, I am going to get my republican right wing black friends to dress up as black panthers and hold kill whitey signs at the next NAACP event. time to start going after these groups with so much power sucking the life out of this country making a political debate not about substance but about "feelings".
    By Mr. Fix It @ 07/14/10 10:24:32 AMreport abuse
  • Let black people
    Do what ever they want.
    By Negrophile @ 07/14/10 10:10:01 AMreport abuse
  • I see it as "raise the white flag" for dimocraps
    The Dimocrap-regime DOJ is basically admitting their politics suck so badly that they need felons to intimidate voters (Black Panthers) and felonious voters to get into power.

    It’s good news.
    By $mooth Operator @ 07/14/10 10:07:00 AMreport abuse
  • Divide and conquer...
    The elites are trying to BRING BACK racism. As far as I am concerned it was on its way out the door for the most part and NOW these EVIL elites are trying to stir up the pot again. DO NOT FALL FOR THESE TRICKS! THAT IS ALL THESE ARE. TRICKS AND DISTRACTIONS. You are being socialially engineered AS WE SPEAK. All you have to do is say NO to their propaganda and it is over for them.
    By Ivan @ 07/14/10 10:01:24 AMreport abuse
  • I am a racist
    I am starting a groupr which will only advance a single race based on color. I will attain government funding friom all races, but only help my race. I will attack anything which cause my race to act responsiblely and call it racist. I will only allow members of my race to set on the board of this organization. I will set up music awards, scholarships, and job placement programs for my race only. We will have our own racialist magazines and tv stations which will be funded by taxpayers of all colors. We will assist in voter fraud for only my race by busing members of my race around town to viote multiple times. If you question this illegal action, you are racist. We will then stand outside voter stations in our racialist garb and denounce all other races.
    By Free birth control @ 07/14/10 09:57:44 AMreport abuse
  • Webwench(...NAACP)
    Getting some interesting posts on this subject today, are we?
    By Chuck @ 07/14/10 09:55:41 AMreport abuse
  • who is advising Dummy???
    Pandering to zealots does nothing but stoke racial tensions and alienates white independents. Odrama needs to access his cracker side and lie about how he's supporting small business/American manufacturers, all the while winking/nodding to blacks and union goons.
    By stepcousin @ 07/14/10 09:54:24 AMreport abuse
  • Breitbart offered $100,000
    Breitbart offered $100,000 dollars for any video or audio evidence of racism at the Obamacare event. There was none. Either the racism is a fantasy or there shouldbe evidence. All the members of the black caucus on theor stroll had cameras in their hands and yet not one of them was able to capture any evidence on tape. Because it did not happen.
    By Steve In Tulsa @ 07/14/10 09:44:40 AMreport abuse
  • NAACP
    Psst-It might be more effective to go around screaming 'racism!' if you actually had some evidence that there is racism in the Tea Party. Just sayin....
    By Randy W @ 07/14/10 09:37:15 AMreport abuse
  • NAACP ACCOMPLISHMENT
    All the NAACP has accomplished by doing this is ensuring that America will never again have a black President. Congratulations! You have also marginalized Dr. Martin Luther King's dream, because you've proven a man's skin color is more important to you than the content of his character. Actually, 90% of black Americans proved this to be the case during the election when a great majority of them voted for Obama because of his skin color. Who are the true racists is America? The NAACP of course!
    By Matt @ 07/14/10 09:31:38 AMreport abuse
  • Urban Legend
    What is the reward up to to prove it happened? 100K? Does this mean the NAACCCP will be collecting that money from Breitbart or whoever put it up, or are they blowing more smoke like the rest of the leftists?
    By Brian in Missouri @ 07/14/10 09:27:39 AMreport abuse
  • The 'R' word
    Of course the NAACP couldn't prove it in court...but they just 'know' there's racism in the Tea Party. You know, that 'implied' undercurrent. We white folks have learned to be subtle about it, stealthy. 'Code words' and all( according to 'experts'). I agree Dan, they're projecting. There has to be a straw man for them to fight. All these white folks just don't want a black man as President. So people like Thomas and 'diversion' or whatever phony handle that zero comes up with today can only talk about how they 'know' it's there, we're the ones who don't see it or want to admit it. Yeah, whatever makes you sleep better at night. God forbid you ever have to offer a shred of proof. Not the anecdotal, 'read it on the internet' 'saw someone on MSNBC report on it' garbage. There are racists in this country. But they aren't all rednecks and old white people...
    By Chuck @ 07/14/10 09:22:10 AMreport abuse
  • Racism = Projection bias
    Modern cries of racism in this country are usually nothing more than projection bias..... If you've never heard of this, it is worth learning.
    By Dan @ 07/14/10 08:16:51 AMreport abuse
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement