advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat

ALL OF THIS FOR 2%?

By
Neal Boortz
@ November 2, 2009 8:28 AM
Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBacks (0)

In the wake of the reveal of Nancy's House healthcare bill, the Congressional Budget Office has released another analysis. It believes that when it is all said and done, the Democrat's government option would only end up covering 2% of Americans. Those are the estimated numbers for Americans under the age of 65. With a pool of 30 million people, only 1-in-5 would sign up for the government option. The rest would then buy into the private option (because the government will force everyone to carry health insurance, remember?). The theory is that less healthy people would be more drawn to the government option because they are moochers. As a result, premiums for the government plan would increase and end up being more costly than private plans.

So why push the government option at all? After all, it's only going to cover a paltry 2%! Glad you asked. The reason for the government option is to put in place the machinery that will be needed to run the private health insurance companies (along with their "obscene" and "immoral" profit margins of 2.2%) out of business. You can't expect the government option to come on the scene with a huge market share. This has to be earned ... and it will be earned by using the bottomless well of taxpayer funds and an endless parade of new government regulations to run the private insurers out of office. The looters are patient. They've been waiting for this opportunity since HillaryCare was killed off by the 1994 voter's revolution. It make take years, but the government option will lead inexorably to a single-payer system .. and the single-payer will the federal government. Give the looters their health care "reform" and you will one day be completely reliant on the decisions and whims of government bureaucrats - people quite possibly not qualified to work in the private sector - in all matters related to your health care.

What fun!



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: ALL OF THIS FOR 2%?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/49240

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • if you had paid attention...........
    GT...............did you gradjueight???

    you must have been out smokin' wit' Tshirt......it's the new math!!!

    3+2= seben.....
  • my girfriend has tol' you................................
    RESISTANCE IS FATFULL.......
  • Hey Lane you're forgetting something
    You will pay for your premium PLUS increased taxes or costs to support that 2%! Cause eventually all those extra taxes to pay for this will filter down to the consumer.
  • CBO says...
    Since GT can't read or do math. I'll help him. Must have gone to Tech.

    "The budget office estimated that about 6 million people would sign up for the public option in 2019, when the House bill is fully phased in. That represents about 2 percent of a total of 282 million Americans under age 65. (Older people are covered through Medicare.)

    The overwhelming majority of the population would remain in private health insurance plans sponsored by employers. Others, mainly low-income people, would be covered through an expanded Medicaid program."
  • Since you mention the camel's nose...
    As Ronaldus Magnus said, government is like a baby, with no limit to its appetite at one end, and no sense of responsibility at the other.
  • whats wrong w/ 2%
    That is fine w/ me, I will remain on my cheaper private insurance so i wont get pushed back in line, and people who want to will take the public option. Win-win. I forgot though that crybaby conservatives are only not crying if Americans lose.
  • Since When?
    I have been out of school for awhile, but is 1in 5 really 2% ???
  • Hey Snarkybird!
    History really repeats itself. For the past 200 years, this US Government took by force, land and possessions from the indigenous population in return to provide them health care (among other things). It's in a treaty! It must be real! That paper gave the US government tremendous power to hunt down and use any force necessary to enforce that agreement. Many men, women, and children died directly by government by government force. And in return? More death from the failure of this US Government to honor its treaty requirements.

    Now, the US Government has returned to take by force, prperty from the new indigenous population (citizens of the US) in return to provide them health care. That paper in Congress grants the US Government tremendous power to hunt down and use whatever force necessary to take any and all belongings to satisfy its revenue raising requirements.

    That bill in Congress is an Authorization document. It does not appropriate anything; but, it gives the US Government the power to enforce seizures. AND if there is no money in the US Treasury for treatment, well, life sucks. Currently I am paying out of pocket for my mother's cancer treatment because there is no money appropriated for Indian Health Care for her treatment.

    A lot of this bill depends on new sources of revenue. Where is the US Government going to find that revenue??? Well, if I manage to make enough money to pay for my mother's treatment chances are this government will come after me for the money. So, let me ask you Mr Snarkybird. Those folks that you talk about needing health care, how happy would they be to find out that the piece of paper they get from the US Government telling them about their new US Government health insurance came at the expense of another person dying? How would they appreciate that? Must be ok. Why? Because being the filthy repugnant sanctimonious thieving liberal that you are, you would bask in the accolades you received from the people that you stole for. That's right, Mr. Snarkybird, you are the thief pretending to be Robin Hood. It's all about YOU and making YOU look like the great savior. It's YOU getting the US Government to steal from someone just as a thief would use a knife in a back alley to steal. And, being the filthy liberal that YOU are, not unlike the KKK of 40 years ago, you would gladly kill a people you find inferior to protect “your own.”
  • Only 2% !?
    Yeah, right. The camel is sticking his nose into the tent. Just wait till you see the rest of the camel ....... it's a whopper!! And he won't be tamed and has a huge apetite.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement