advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat

YEAH ... BUT HOW DOES THAT EXPLAIN 2008?

By
Neal Boortz
@ September 30, 2009 8:03 AM
Permalink | Comments (65) | TrackBacks (0)

Florida governot Charlie Crist is now on record as saying that Barack Obama will not be reelected in 2012. Hopefully he is right. Let's all remember, though, that if Obama does fail to win reelection it will be for one simple reason ... and only one. Racism. There is no possible reason on the face of the earth not to support Obama for a second term. You're a racist. Simple as that. An Obama defeat in 2012 will be all the proof the world knows to know that America truly is a racist nation. Never mind that he was elected in 2008. We just didn't realize he was black then ... right?



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: YEAH ... BUT HOW DOES THAT EXPLAIN 2008?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/45107

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Crist
    You can add another Floridian who will say "NO" to Crist. A RINO of the genus odiferous countryclubus.
  • Re: East Coast Conservative
    Smooth, you are right, NC Conserv was the name I was trying to remember!! Same MO - talk radio is evil; we, who are uncompromising conservatives, are considered nuts; and that pseudo-intellectual attitude of calling us childish while he can't put one single coherent thought down in his posts.

    EAST/NC Liberal - your last post proves once again, that not only are you not a conservative, but that your critical thinking skills are that of a naive child.

    These are your statements:

    (1) "I really haven't seen where we have been helped much by the tea party or townhall protests." It stopped the govt option from passing so far and has destroyed Obama's ratings, you dolt. WTF!!!!

    (2) "It seems to have valdiated the notion that we're all nuts." - That statement alone tells us that you are a phony. The only people who have that view are Pelosi and die-hard libtards.

    (3) "I talk about this stuff to people at work everyday and it's sad to see moderates leaning democrat....".... Oh yes, another mathematical genius speaks. He takes a sample of about 5 people(all who are the same), and uses that as the basis for his conclusion!! Using your methodology, I must be Superman, because I polled my 5 year old and 3 year old, and they think Daddy is Superman!!

    (4) LAST TIME - give me ONE SINGLE significant issue where the talk radio guys (Rush, Levin, Hannity) are off base as conservatives..... Tell me! Is it low taxes, small govt, what is it that you find so wrong with their view???
  • East Coast Conservative
    I really haven't seen where we have been helped much by the tea party or townhall protests. It seems to have valdiated the notion that we're all nuts. I talk about this stuff to people at work everyday and it's sad to see moderates leaning democrat since we're not promoting a message or showing leadership.
    By East Coast Conservative

    Now I have to take issue with you on that. The Tea Party's are great. They have opened the eyes of people from all parties, not just Republicans. They have served to get us more involved and educated about what Washington is doing or not doing.

    It is a truly American thing! I am proud of them and glad to have participated in one, hope to again. You should try it, even just as an observer, I think you would change your mind.
  • @East Coast Conservative
    You are pedantic and absurd. Your post is both laughable and pathetic at the same time:
    1) Your post is contradictory.
    2) You mention Huckabee and conservative in the same post.
    3) Looking at what you've posted in the past reveals your contempt for talk radio--yet you post here.
    4) You re-invent history to make your point.

    Club-A-Liberal and myself have been consistent on this board to call out all libs posing as conservatives. I think you are actually NCConservative with a new moniker. Nice try, but not good enough. Go away unless you have something intelligent to post.
  • STOP IT!
    Alright everybody stop arguing two different points on the same topic. 3mbw, you're going to have to explain Grover Cleveland. He was the only president to serve two terms NONCONSECUTIVELY. That is the scenario put forth. It has nothing to do with the constitutional amendment limiting the President to two terms.

    Yeesh.

    And the point 3mbw was making was a long shot at best anyway. It could happen constitutionally. There's about a .01% chance it will.
  • Reasons for Obama's Win
    Ivan's follower makes some good points.

    Go back to before the Iowa caucus. Hillary was leading by a good margin. Obama was struggling. BO won Iowa and that changed everything, putting Hillary on the ropes and in a must-win in NH to keep going and BO gained huge momentum and became the frontrunner.

    What event happened?????? or should I say didn't happen? The MSM had the goods on John Edwards and his lovechild long ago. They refused to run the story. IF THEY HAD RUN the story prior to the Iowa caucus, Edwards would have been history. Remember, Edwards finished 2nd, HC was 3rd in Iowa. There is no doubt that most of Edwards supporters would have gone to Hillary. Hillary would have won Iowa, Bozo would have been done shortly thereafter.

    My reasons for OBozo win:
    - a criminal media, not only not reporting on all the radical ties of Obozo, but creating such a animosity for 8 years over Bush (BDS) that a Republican stood no chance;
    - Because of the BDS, they created such a fervor for "change", that the Democrats could have run a totem pole for a win;
    - the braindead voting public. Obama energized groups that typically don't vote: the young and the minorities. He also got the guilty whites, he got the so-called moderates and all other uninformed morons who couldn't tell you what they ate for breakfast on any given day;
    - the GOP ran the lamest candidate who ran the lamest campaign in memory. Then again, given the points above, I don't think anything mattered.
    - The final nail in the coffin was the financial chaos in September.

    Bottom line: the election had nothing to do with the issues, past experience, accomplishments, and associations, people wanted to be part of a historical movement.
  • "The reason you are now attacking me is because I called you out for the phony that you are."

    The only phony you exposed was yourself.

    "do you think that the GOP would have had anyone step up to the plate to the voice the opinion of millions of conservatives?"

    We don't have anyone to do that now, that's part of the problem. That's why we need to start to find and promote our 2012 primary candidates now.

    I want a conservative elected and sworn in on Jan 20, 2013. However, the childish antics of some in talk radio and people like yourself (Club-a-Liberal? You handle screams immaturity) are making that job harder.

    "Do you think that there would have been any tea parties or townhall protests"

    I really haven't seen where we have been helped much by the tea party or townhall protests. It seems to have valdiated the notion that we're all nuts. I talk about this stuff to people at work everyday and it's sad to see moderates leaning democrat since we're not promoting a message or showing leadership.
  • @3mbw
    First off, your Grover scenario is borderline insane. Consider what OBozo is facing: (1) things are not looking good for 2010 elections (2) He is losing independents, and many of hardcore libs are getting mad also; (3) if Dems lose big in 2010, the Dems will be imploding from within; (4) Don't kid yourself on the economy, it's not getting better; we've just gone through the consumer/residential lending mess; wait until the commercial real estate starts tanking; take a look at the unoccupied strip malls around and the other CRE and the condo projects that went on the books in 2006. That will hit soon.; Rates have to eventually start rising given the skyrocketing debt; unemployment keeps heading higher(5) if Obozo loses in 2012, and GOP gains in Congress, OBozo won't be able to show his face, let alone run again.

    And you think that he would actually come back and run again after getting thrown out of DC by the back of his pants?? How stupid is that? Besides, what on earth will he run on in 2016, "New and Improved Change - (from my first term)" "Well, No we didn't, BUT now yes, we can."

    Look, we can have an honest debate on all the possibilities of 2012 and 2016, but to actually think, especially in this day and age, that a President who gets thrown out on his a$$ after having both the House and Senate in his first term would come back as a viable candidate 4 years later is beyond ridiculous. Not to mention a President who is so radical that has in a short time galvanized so many aginst him. Plus, the reason he got here in the first place was that he was "the new face, the DC -outsider, the cool guy." That all will be gone. He will have to run on his record - and OH what a record it will be!!!
  • rejeff
    To be someone who states concern with the deficit and then hopes republican's gain control is to be a walking contradiction.

    FYI - projected deficit on Jan 19, 2009 - $1.2t.

    You've been sold a lie. name the last republican president who left office with the debt and deficit lower than when he left. Then name the last democrat who hasn't.

    (answer: Ike and LBJ respectively)
  • Will any of this matter?
    Long before November 2012, Israel, impatient and fed up with Obama's focus on getting the Olympics for Chicago, will act independently against Iran. Once that happens, all other predictions made today will be irrelevant.
  • Clinton credit ?
    I don't think I'd be so fast to give him so much credit. Look at his Congress. Who wrote the bills?

    The best thing he ever did was "just sign it Bill" and stay out of the way.
  • @Snarky
    Snarky, let's look at what Jeff said. He made strong points. There is no denying that the boon of the 90's was attributed to the development of a huge industry - the internet. We had share movements of $100 per day in stocks, IPOs skyrocketing 1000% on opening day. Not one dotcom was even close to profit, and their business models were as vapid and ridiculous as an Obama speech. It didn't matter - for a while then, you just slap ".com" to the end of whatever, and you had capital flowing in. Plus, we were in a time od "peace", then. Well, like the housing bubble, that crashed.

    I am not defending Bush, but the 2000's were not what libs make it out to be. Consider the events:

    2000's - dot.coms crashing and bubble's bursting

    March 2001 - official designation of the recession. Can't blame Bush. Bush just got there, Gore was still counting chads at this point.

    Bush implements tax cuts. Economy begins to show life. Then, BOOM, 9/11 hits. We get out of that mess, we have wars, we have Katrina, we had the Enron and Worldcom scandals, yet unemployment was at 4.5 at one point. Most of the time it was hovering the 5 or so range! I recall Demos creating new definitions for unemployment just to scare people into telling them that things aren't good. The Dow hit a record 14,000 under Bush! It hovered in the 12K and 13K range for years. Consumer confidence #'s were at all-time highs. Gas prices were in $2 range, individual wealth skyrocketed.

    Things starting changing after 2006. Coincidence that is when Dem Congress took over. All the indicators I mention above started going the opposite way.

    Now, imagine how much even better it could have been if Bush didn't spend like a liberal, and if he didn't have to deal with one tragedy after another and the wars??
  • Oh good grief
    3mbw, I believe Jeffery is referring to YOUR statement as follows: "unless of course the constitution is amended to remove the term limits for President."

    AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION --- TERM LIMITS

    Okay?

    If they ever do away with term limits for President then just hang it up, cause the special interest lobbyists will make it almost impossible to get him out. Not so much the voters, as those willing to sell their vote.

    We need term limits for Congress!
  • retwisted
    You said "Just because the economy is good or bad when a certain president is in power does NOT in any way mean that president is the cause"

    while not the only cause or, in some cases, no part of it at all - let's face it, it matters in elections.

    To me, clinton simply took advantage of a good thing and was smart enough to stay out of its way.

    So, we had boom time and ended up with a surplus in revenue from taxes (which, given the coming wave of boomers I viewed as a good thing - rainy day fund), and debt and deficit were going down. great.

    Did Clinton cause the boom? no. But he used it for the right purposes. namely paying down debt and deficits.

    but again, in terms of the topic here, if the economy is back on its feet and unemployment is down - Obama will get and take credit (Any president would - mostly because when it's bad, they get the blame too - right or wrong.). And it will help him in an election.
  • @Jeffery, another conservative gets it wrong
    “Are you assuming that the Dems will do away with the consecutive two-term limits applied to the POTUS?”

    Oh goody, another conservative that can’t read.

    For the THIRD time. The Obama election in 2016 I was referring to was part of the “Grover Cleveland” scenario where the American people make a serious mistake and elect a Republican in 2012 who will effectively be a pawn of Rush.

    Four more years of Cheney/Bush polices will put the country back into the basement again and set the stage for Obama to be elected to a SECOND term in 2016.

    Come on conservatives, if you are going to try to rebut something, at least get it right.

    Is it any wonder we don't want any conservative anywhere near the White House?
  • snarky
    cap and trade may have support from your side but it is going to create a economic crisis for both sides. I look at it as a way for you dems to take even more of our money to pay for your ridiculous programs.

    I fear the healthcare bill in some form or another will pass and unfortunately one day I will be telling you I told you so when the quality of our medical care declines, our deficit goes through the roof, and our country goes bankrupt....my children and their children will bear the brunt of this.

    hopefully this will become moot if the repubs regain control of congress...this will effectively stop obama from screwing us so he will have to resort to "intellectual masturbation" to get his jollies....hey, maybe he and his staff will let you in on their circle jerk!
  • Snarky
    "cap and trade has huge support among his base."

    I think it's too soon to tell about that. We've all been so tied up talking about health care, that we may find a lot of people have changed their minds about cap & trade. Especially when they see it may cost them their re-election, cause I don't think mainsteam America wants that crap.

    Home from Iraq, yeah good, but then we just in with both feet into Afghanistan!?? That originally received support, but rumblings are growing about that being just as big a disaster.

    So both those items are changing, too soon to call.
  • Liberal Logic
    Ok, that's an oxymoron, but you get the idea. Unfortunately, many of the uneducated and unintelligent people out there do not realize that correlation is NOT causation.

    Just because the economy is good or bad when a certain president is in power does NOT in any way mean that president is the cause. You need to look much, much deeper than that, and even then at best you are making a guess.

    But...who I am kidding, liberals aren't interested in learning, just spewing their crap all based in emotion.
  • 3m
    I read exactly what you wrote. I know 10 year-olds that can form a more coherent sentence than you. Nice try, though. I almost made more sense than half the stuff you post here. As for "thinking for myself," you should try taking your own advice. Anyone who steps outside his or her own ego and "feelings" for half a second can see that Obama is a fraud. I don't need or want FOX or Rush Limbaugh to tell me that--- I just watch and listen to The One, himself. I have yet to hear him prove he has an ounce of character, or an IQ above 100.
  • rejoyce
    I think you're right but, if I were Obama I'd make sure to have immigration reform in full swing by 2010.

    it will jumble up your base badly enough in red and red-leaning states that blue staters will be safe and dems running in close races in conservative districts will benefit from split voting blocks.

    JMO. anything can change between now and then...
  • What's really going to happen
    First off the only reason that Obama actually was elected in the first place is because he is black.

    Consider -- going into the 2008 elections it was pretty much a given no Republican was going to win, the people had 8 years of Bush and that was enough. So a Democrat was going to win.

    Then the Democrats put their hats into the ring, Queen Hillary expected she wouldn't even have to campaign to win, just like she "won" her Senate seat in New York. This didn't really sit well with the Independents.

    So up comes this articulate, poised, black man against Hillary. First the other non-competes (Biden, etc) drop out and we have basically a two way race - a white woman that many people don't like and a black man? And the media goes on and on about "the historic event". They knew a Dem would win, woman or minority.

    We know from polling that the black base of the Democratic party went heavily for Obama and the Independents all "wanted to be part of the historic event", thus, he was elected BECAUSE he is black.

    Now fast forward to 2012, what is going to happen? This one is my prediction:

    Obama is going to lose the 2012 elections. People aren't going to want to send a man back to the White House that they can not criticize with out being accused of being racists. This isn't going to sit well at all with his most rabid acolytes.

    For those of you that follow the doomsday prophecies, there's a big one set to go off on or around Dec 21, 2012.

    So, I think what will happen is after the courts rule on every precinct that doesn't go Obama and gets challenged -- expect it -- riots will break out across the country. Then Obama will declare marshal law and suspend the Constitution (merely a formality since he ignores it anyway) to be able to "restore order".

    Once suspended, he'll not step down and his army of worshipers will just want to keep it that way.

    That's my theory anyway.
  • snarky
    the economic boom of the 90s was based alot on the dot coms which were all fluff and no substance.

    when the dot coms began failing and the economy tanked Bush initiated his tax cuts which basically turned the economy around.

    yes it is true...the dems and acorn were driving the sub prime lending so people could buy houses they could not afford.

    yes it is true...your president was a lawyer for acorn and was a disciple of its originator. i bet if you look in his shorts you will see a couple of acorns.

    i dont need to start a secret club....nothing I say or do is deceitful...that is your way not mine.

    so please tell me more about this poor pitiful woman that you know that actually has to work to pay for her health insurance. my god, that story really tugs at my heart strings...
  • @East Coast Conservative
    You complain about me and Smooth while at the same time you call us childish names? The reason you are now attacking me is because I called you out for the phony that you are.

    You keep saying that Rush and the evil talk radio hosts are "bringing us down". I will ask you AGAIN a couple of questions:

    (1) What specific topics do you think Rush and the talk radio hosts are wrong on?

    (2) Where does Levin, Rush, etc. break from the conservatism you say you are for?

    (3) if it were not for talk radio, do you think that the GOP would have had anyone step up to the plate to the voice the opinion of millions of conservatives? Do you think that there would have been any tea parties or townhall protests which have proved to be more effective in stopping the runaway Statist train than anyone's wildest imagination?
  • Congress is the key
    If we can regain control of Congress with legitimate representatives, not RINO's and not even DINO's (they do exist) then we could stand another Obama run if we don't have a good candidate. Anything to keep him under control. And we might have to settle for that cause I don't see anyone other than Ron Paul that I feel good about.

    Anyone else?
  • rejeff
    let me see if I understand your view...

    the economic boom of the 90's was built on lies.

    and the Bush economic record was good except for the one thing he couldnt fix.

    and that one thing was protected by democrats and acorn.

    and obama is somehow a part of that by being a huge player in acorn.

    um.. you and ivan might want to start like a secret club. you could make your own handshakes, jackets....you'd love it. might get you out of the house more too...
  • rejeff
    you're viewing this through the lens of your party

    cap and trade has huge support among his base.

    healthcare reform in some form will pass. and that will go in the win column. and it will be easy to point to GOP efforts as obstructionist (that's how they're viewed now by most)

    So, HC reform will pass, cap and trade will pass (base happy), immigration will split the GOP into a bloody mess, and as you said - Iraq troops home = good.

    and all I'm saying is - to think obama doesnt have a very strong chance at getting a second term if all this happens AND the economy turns around is intellectual masturbation.
  • 3mbw
    the economy under Clinton was based upon a bunch of lies called dot coms...kind of like the lies you guys perpetrated on the housing industry to secure loans for people that had no business getting them. it just so happened they failed after Bush took office. Also, 9-11 and several major hurricanes didn't help.
    the economy may or may not be recovering...time will tell...but it definitely has nothing to do with Obama.
    Even with these hurdles the economy under Bush did rather well...at least my 401K says it did. if the dems hadn't meddled into the economy via securing housing loans for their constituents then we wouldn't have experienced the problems we have now. Bush tried to fix it before it crashed only to be stopped by Frank, Dodd and company. ACORN was a huge part of this problem...and should I mention Obama was a huge player in ACORN?
  • snarky
    What a strange observation...

    "But, you think that if the economy does improve and unemployment goes down and he can point to a healthcare reform bill being passed, a cap and trade bill being passed, an immigration bill passed, and the majority of combat troops home from Iraq .... you think he'd not have a really strong chance at winning in 2012?"

    Out of these four things the only one that will garner any support for him is the last...getting out of Iraq.
    I am not sure if you have been paying attention but the polls show overwhelming opposition to his healthcare bill...ditto cap and trade which will place undo economic stress on the individual for something that won't work against something that doesn't exist. and where were you when mccain and kennedy tried to legalize the illegals?
  • Obama in 2016???
    "In 2016, Obama will defeat the Rushbot in a landslide election that will resemble the defeat of Jimmy Carter by Ronald Reagan in 1980 and will result in at least 12 years of Democratic control of the White House as Obama’s VP will then go on to serve 2 terms, unless of course the constitution is amended to remove the term limits for President."

    Are you assuming that the Dems will do away with the consecutive two-term limits applied to the POTUS? If so, then, also assuming, if Obama makes it to 2016, there will be NO HOPE of retrieving America.

    I personally elieve that if We the People don't make a REAL change in 2010, then we're screwed and the Big R will only be a matter of time....I was just trying to think positive in that we actually have until 2016 (which I don't believe we do).

    ~Jeffrey
  • Good bye Charlie
    He may be right, but all Charlie is doing is pandering for his Senate run. Me, I can't stand Charlie, for one he's a Lawyer like Obama. Republican or not, he's just a pandering lawyer is all, say anything for a vote. Be careful with this one folks.. Look what he's done for Florida so far "nothing".
  • Pattern of history
    "The pattern of history is that the Dems get us into trouble and the Repubs get us out."

    Let's see, we had a growing economy under Clinton, then Republican Bush came along and the economy tanked.

    Now we're starting to see signs of recovery and conservatives talk about the people letting the republicans back in charge? Forget that.

    what was it about the falling stock market or the credit crunch that conservatives find so appealing?
  • I see it the other way around
    A vote for Obama in 2012 is an acknowledgement that the presidency has become an equal opportunity employment job. Qualifications? Character? Who needs 'em? As long as you're colored and you whine about racism, you get the job.
  • Crist , Grayson & 3mbw
    Crist is history, Grayson is history, 3mbw,3mbw , protein spill on aisle 3,by the VCRs

    Marco Rubio in 10,that's the ticket
  • @Club-a-Liberal and David
    Club-a-Liberal: “Hey skidmark, did that govt education teach you math? 2016??? Or are you thinking your Messiah will run for a third term??”

    David Hughes: “In 2016, Obama will be re-elected? Really? I was under the impression that our Constitution only allowed for two terms; 2016 would make three.”

    Club and David have given us a good demonstration that conservatives don’t bother to read what they are responding to. Which in most cases doesn’t matter since they don’t do their own research and thinking anyway. But in this case made them look silly.

    The Obama election in 2016 I was referring to was part of the “Grover Cleveland” scenario where the American people make a mistake and elect a Republican in 2012 who will effectively be a pawn of Rush.

    Four more years of Cheney/Bush polices will put the country back into the basement again and set the stage for Obama to be elected to a SECOND term in 2016.

    Of course I do believe that Obama will be reelected in 2012 so the Grover Cleveland scenario is just that, a scenario.
  • 3m is snorting
    Obviously the same thing the snorter in cheif in snorting.
  • Go easy on 3mbw
    after all they are just doing their job. whoever pays them to post their incessant idiocy is getting their money's worth. in all reality the person behind 3mbw probably isn't that brain dead.
  • There's always impeachement
    Any thinking person knows Obama's dirty.
    He's a Magna Cum Laude graduate of the Chicago School of Politics. He's tight with Acorn, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, etc..
    It's only a matter of time before the big Obama scandle hits and it may happen before conservatives even have a chance to defeat his corrupt ass in 2012.
  • I would be very careful
    So yes we've seen traditional conservatism attmepting to make a comeback with Dr. Ron Paul leading the way with the Tea Parties and now auditing the Fed,even Fox news is now using Ron Paul's ideas for their Tea Parties... but we must remain ever vigilant. The republican party is still split between those who would vote for neo-con types like Bush,Mccain or Romney and those who are the more traditional conservatives supporting the ideas of people like Thomas Jefferson,Ron Paul,Calvin Coolidge and so on. The traditional conservatives MUST help open the eyes of the neo-cons to get them to accept traditional conservatism.If the GOP puts up another candidate who supports things like the Patriot Act,corporate welfare, amnesty of illegal aliens, unaffordable undeclared wars, world policing, telling us there's a terror threat while the border is wide open, and does not come out against the income tax and more in favor of the fair tax....the traditional conservatives are not going to buy it. Obama will win.Last time Mccain managed to split the republican vote with whatever brand of political philosophy he believes in, (I just know it didn't have much to do with conservatism ) if the GOP gets another Mccain type candidate, it will split the republican voters into voting either Mccain type or going with an actual conservative like Ron Paul. If this happens Obama will be in the white house another 4. Ron Paul types proved last election even when Mccain asked Ron Paul for an endorsement, that traditional conservatives cannot be bought or swayed by a neo-con type that lacks constitutional principle.The GOP needs a STRICT constitutionalist the next go around, or its not going to work. Gary Johnson would be great if Ron Paul does not run.
  • really?
    Let's look at some basic facts.

    AFter the onslaught of opposition and a huge march on washington to protest his policies, the president's approval rating is where reagan's was at this point in his presidency - 52 percent (and climbing)

    But, you think that if the economy does improve and unemployment goes down and he can point to a healthcare reform bill being passed, a cap and trade bill being passed, an immigration bill passed, and the majority of combat troops home from Iraq .... you think he'd not have a really strong chance at winning in 2012?

    It's obviously too soon to tell who the GOP candidate would be but, look at where overall GOP numbers are now. Look at how the public views GOP congressional opposition to health care reform...

    If you think you have a slam dunk in 2012...well, as a partisan - great! it will make it easy. But, objectively speaking, you have a long road to hoe to get to the oval office in 2012.

    and my hunch is any immigration reform efforts will end up splintering your party so badly, you won't have any solid coalition around a single candidate or set of policies.
  • Commoner
    "When the choice is between far right extremism and far left extremism...far left extremism wins everytime."

    Extremism of any kind is what we are trying to get away from!

    Conservatives can win as long as they stand their ground, have a real platform and quit apologizing, especially when there is nothing to apologize for. EastCoast I think you are only seeing one facet. We will have to provide a united effort, critizing each other is not going to get there. Huckabee needs to show more convictions in his beliefs for me (and I'm not talking religious beliefs). Smooth and Club are only representative of the frustration most conservatives feel with the un-American attitudes and criticisms coming from our own politicians and many from our own group. No one is a "pawn" of talk radio, that is falling into the liberal mind set, in my opinion of course! You seem to think differently of course, but we'll work it out later.
  • Jimmy Jr.
    By 2012 Jimmy Jr.'s policies will have the misery index back to 20% unless he is stopped by massive democrat losses in congress in 2010. At which point he will be a one term wonder just like Sr.. If 2010 puts the brakes on him we will still be in double digits on the misery index, it'll just be a question of if the democrats can continue to place all the blame on the republicans. Unfortunately it is to much to hope for that the libertarians would make some inroads, America is to busy letting the people behind the dems and gop buy their votes.
  • Crist is right...
    ...but I think he is just being self-serving in saying this. I think Obama will go the way of the "great" Jimmy Carter and be a one-term failure as President. Then he can go back to running ACORN or some other disaster of a community organization - or maybe go into partnership with Bill Clinton in something.

    The decisions Obama has been making so far will not lead to an economic recovery. They will lead to a Republican sweep in the mid-term elections (assuming the Repubs can get their act together) followed by a Republican President in 2012. The pattern of history is that the Dems get us into trouble and the Repubs get us out.
  • Ultimate RINO
    The GOP better not think of having this Crist play a major role in the future. He is the ultimate RINO. They need to rid the party of guys like this. This guy is a panderer of the worst order. Whichever way the winds are blowing, he follows. Following the election, when many of the GOP were sulking and were wondering of the future direction of the party, many were talking of this guy playing a prominent role because they felt that the party needs to move to the center (actually, the party has been in the center).

    Don't forget, he was the final nail that gave us McCain. Guilliani spent a month in FL before the primary. Crist stabbed him in the back and endorsed McCain. Exit polls showed that his endorsement was critical. McCain winning FL buried not only Rudy, but pretty much ended Romney's chance.
  • @Joyce
    At first I thought it was Stan's #1 Fan doing his satire, but I scrolled down and saw 3mbw's name!! Seriously, I find it fascinating that someone can think like that. I mean, how do you get to that point to think like this??
  • Obama will not be re-elected
    But all black peeps will have to blame Obama's Audocity("social justice"), as to why Whites will be afraid to elect another black(half) in a Very Long time. Obama has left a bad taste in my mouth. I wanted a black president, but this has scared me for the future. Also, being from Florida, not interested in Charlie Crist Either for Senate Run in 2010.
  • 20 Mistatements by 3mbw
    You need to be studied. You are an unusual case - the more you are educated here, the dumber you get. Maybe Dr. House can see you?

    You are a comedy show:

    (1) "If we continue to see improvement in the economy and restoration of our country’s strength and moral character, we will reelect the President who led the repair effort"

    LOL!! Continued improvement? Are you on planet earth? This idiot in the WH has conducted an unprecedeented assault on this country and economy that we have never seen before.

    (2)"We will be the laughing stock of the world with our wacko and weak president under the control ..."

    WTF!!! We have two-bit tyrants and teenage skin and bone Somali "pirates" wiping their a$$ with us now. Everyone senses the weakness of BO. So much so, that the Dolt had to practically be forced by a FRENCH President to say something about Iran last week at the UN. How embarrassing.

    (3) " In 2016, Obama will defeat the Rushbot in a landslide election..."

    Hey skidmark, did that govt education teach you math? 2016??? Or are you thinking your Messiah will run for a third term??

    (4) "the American people either are duped or experience a lapse in judgment and elect the Republican candidate instead"

    Never in the history of this country have so many uninformed, unknowledgable, braindead people come out last November to be duped into voting for OBozo. The majority of these voters for BO couldn't tell you who Pelosi was even if you put a gun to their head. Go to www.howobamagotelected.com to get a real taste of who was voting last year. I think you may be in one of the videos.w
  • 3mbw
    In 2016, Obama will be re-elected? Really? I was under the impression that our Constitution only allowed for two terms; 2016 would make three. But it's irrelevant, anyway, as I see no way short of MASSIVE voter fraud that this guy will be around for a second term... unless the RNC decides to run McCain again (which wouldn't surprise me). At any rate, I doubt the O will go unchallenged in his own party for 2012. Could be interesting to see which Dem is ready to cut him off at the knees.
  • 3dmb & 2012
    You're extra funny today.
  • Crist
    Crist probably believes that Obama won't win a second term because Crist believes he will be our next president. I suppose Crist plans to abandon the senate seat he is seeking after abandoning the governors mansion to run for the senate
  • 2012 is already decided
    Obama is reelected in a landslide. When the choice is between far right extremism and far left extremism...far left extremism wins everytime.

    3mbw is right...the Conservatives are generally scared to stand-up to Rush. As long as Rush is perceived as the front man for the Republican Party, moderates and independents are going to continue to vote Democrat.
  • 2012
    Whats all this talk about the 2012 AND 2016 elections? I thought the Mayan's said the world was going to end in Dec 2012 anyway??

    :D
  • Re: Ubiquitous @ 09/30/09 08:33:47 AM
    Well Shoot man, I don't see any point in commenting after that supreme Zinger.

    Somebody get 3mbw some ice, Ow, that had to hurt!!
  • @SkyWatch
    Exactly. If the nation decomposes at a slow enough rate the people will either not notice or will cheer on the decay (i.e. 3mbw). If you damage the nation too fast people will take notice.

    I think the bad thing about the current trend towards patriotism with the tea party movement and such will fade away when the nation returns to a state of slow decay. We'll get a RINO in 2012 and suddenly the people won't care enough about liberty and the Constitution enough to protest.
  • 2012 Is Irrelevant
    Next year's election is hopefully going to put the brakes on our Marxist president. I don't even THINK about 2012, because if we allow the socialist party to retain their majority in the Senate next year.....GAME OVER
  • Obama defeat in 2012 as Racism
    Other than the contries of Africa and South America, I don't see where the rest of the world has elected ANYONE of color, especially in Europe, to the highest office. The UK and Western Europe has been around alot longer than the US and they have had a significant black population for at least as long as the US has been in existence. So, if they want to throw that 'racist' line at us, they should first take a good look in the mirror and at their own 'glass houses'.
  • LOL"!!!!!
    Oh my, I don't know whether to laugh or cry at 3's post, someone help me, I'm having difficulty typing here ROFLOL!!!!!

    The ONLY way Obama is going to win again is if we totally fail to find someone to run against him. He could very well defeat "nobody".
  • hey 3bmw
    I suggest you start breaking the Prozacs in half.
  • Bush?
    "Sorry, but George Bush isn't running for President."

    George Bush didn't repair anything, if you remember he's the one who left the mess behind for someone to cleanup.
  • 2012
    I hope Crist is right, but I am very concerned that we can't make it happen unless we start now.

    There needs to be some solid credible faces out there now from which our 2012 primary candidates will emerge. I don't mean Sarah Palin, I don't mean recycling the same bunch as 2008 (although Huckabee seems to have a lot of support here at work). It needs to be people solidly conservative who the left cannot paint as pawns of talk radio.

    And the immature behavior of our members, like we see too often on forums like this must stop. Who is going to support a candidate who is supported by such childish people? Smooth Operator and Club-a-Liberal provided examples yesterday how the party "faithful" is cutting its own throat.

    Come on people, grow up. Too much is at stake for us to be abdicating our responsibilites and to be putting a childish undesirable face on the party and conservatism.
  • Too much too fast
    Crist also said that he just thinks Obama is doing things to fast. He didn't say that his policies are wrong just that it should be done piece meal.
  • Charlie Crist
    Charlie is just trying to sound like a Republican after standing on the corner like a common prostitute waiting for Barack "Big Pimpin" Obama to hand out the Stimulus Checks. Marco Rubio in 10.
  • Sorry 3mbw
    You lost your credibility when you presented the first likely (?) scenario: If we continue to see improvement in the economy and restoration of our country’s strength and moral character, we will reelect the President who led the repair effort.
    You certainly are not talking about the current one. What a joke! He just lowered the bar for all future contenders.
  • Re 2012
    Too early in the morning for someone to be hitting the crack pipe.

    better put that tin foil cap back on.
  • YEAH ... BUT HOW DOES THAT EXPLAIN 2008?.
    > If we continue to see improvement in
    > the economy and restoration of our
    > country’s strength and moral
    > character, we will reelect the
    > President who led the repair effort.

    Sorry, but George Bush isn't running for President.
  • 2012
    Concerning the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections. I see two scenarios.

    First the Likely Scenario. If we continue to see improvement in the economy and restoration of our country’s strength and moral character, we will reelect the President who led the repair effort.

    The second possibility is what I call the “Grover Cleveland” scenario. In this set of circumstances, the American people either are duped or experience a lapse in judgment and elect the Republican candidate instead. Who will this Republican be? We know that given the current state of the Republican Party the candidate will be a right wing extremist under the thumb of Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh will effectively be the unofficial dictator of the United States because the president will not stand up to him and will take his marching orders from Rush and the “shadow cabinet” of conservative media personalities. We will be the laughing stock of the world with our wacko and weak president under the control of a talk show host and the policies will be like Cheney/Bush in turbo mode.

    In 2016, Obama will defeat the Rushbot in a landslide election that will resemble the defeat of Jimmy Carter by Ronald Reagan in 1980 and will result in at least 12 years of Democratic control of the White House as Obama’s VP will then go on to serve 2 terms, unless of course the constitution is amended to remove the term limits for President.

    Right now, my money’s on the first scenario. After all, after eight years of a disastrous republican administration that presided over the collapse of our economy and reputation, there are not a lot of people who are looking to put a Republican back in right now. Especially since they apparently are too weak to even express disapproval of a radio host that is doing the party harm without day later going back to him groveling for his forgiveness.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement