advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?

By
Neal Boortz
@ September 25, 2009 8:42 AM Permalink | Comments (23) | TrackBacks (0)

More about those three ISLAMIC terror plots that have been exposed. Did you know that in each case the MUSLIM goons have been charged them with a plot to kill Americans using ... now get this ... "weapons of mass destruction."

So, just what types of weapons were these MUSLIM terrorists going to use? The evidence seems to be that they were thinking about putting hydrogen peroxide-based explosives into backpacks where they could be triggered by cell phones. There is also a report that they tried at one point to rent a truck. There's another story out there about a foiled MUSLIM terrorist plot in Illinois. Wolf Blitzer told us last night that the suspect actually tried to push the button on a truck bomb. Blitzer specifically referred to this as a "weapon of mass destruction."

What's the big point here? Well .. the constant media use of the "weapons of mass destruction" phrase. Really? Is that what these ISLAMIC terrorist suspects were going to use? Maybe it's just me, but all this time I thought that the phrase applied to nuclear and chemical or biological weapons. I guess I was wrong, and if this is the actual description of a "weapon of mass destruction," then guess what? We DID, in fact, find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Under the definition currently being used, every car bomb and every IED was a weapon of mass destruction. President Bush said they were there ... we went there to find them ... and find them we did!

So .. the next time some leftist moonbat starts in on this "where were the weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq bit ... you know what to do.

Categories:

Tags:

Main Index | Archives | RSS feed

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/44525

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • I never...
    understood why even chem and most bio weapons are called "weapons of mass destruction". Even when, what was it, sarine gas was dropped in a Tokyo SUBWAY (underground, not a lot of fresh air, crowded, etc), only a few people died, despite the fact that the gas was supposedly very deadly. And I do not know of a bio weapon that is all that terribly effective in a clean, sanitary country like the US, with the best medical care in the world.
    By BWM @ 09/28/09 01:33:51 AMreport abuse
  • @ red leader
    Right, the actions of the U.S. preceding the 9/11 attacks. I guess we should not have built those buildings so tall. So I guess what you are trying to say is the attackers had a moral duty, and just cause, or obligation to kill themselves and others, and they did the right thing? (I do not catch your drift.)
    By Greg @ 09/26/09 06:41:38 AMreport abuse
  • Jimmy Dolan: http://www.egovernmentgrants.org/federal-grants/
    The following sentence states the purpose of establishing our federal constitutional republic:

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Wherein do you infer that it says NOT to spend money on our military? And from which words do you glean it to say TO spend it on bailouts, mosquito netting for foreign nations, measuring ketchup flow rates, airports, left handed people, awwww, good grief. I have a picture in my mind of what you think our Constitution is about: The WELFARE CLAUSE! http://www.egovernmentgrants.org/federal-grants/

    Please, for the love of your neighbors, stop voting!
    By ed davis @ 09/25/09 03:19:06 PMreport abuse
  • them stinkin' pork chop steelin' desert dwellers......
    folks look behind you........made you look! made you look!

    yep the stinkin' muslim bombvest wearin' sumbitches have got you all worked up and you are complainin'.......

    with our borders wide open what is it that's going to stop 'em????? huh whaaaa......I don't hear you.......

    before they set off their wmd sob ied what ever......I'm gonna say......

    I TOLD YOU SO!!!!.......now that I got that outa the way......
    By butt neckid @ 09/25/09 01:12:33 PMreport abuse
  • WMDs
    THANK YOU NEAL FOR SAYING THIS!! Finally someone can admit that we did in fact find and destroy WMDs in Iraq. The BIGGEST one? Mr Hussein himself. How many thousands of people were killed for no reason under him? Thank you Neal for pointing this out to all those who think Bush went over there to get back at him for trying to kill his daddy.
    By American Girl @ 09/25/09 12:45:31 PMreport abuse
  • @ Greg
    What I am saying makes perfect logical sense if you simply allow yourelf to understand the nature of the problem. I didn't change the subject at all. I just simply went to the root of the problem. Im just taking a traditional conservative stance on the subject. Hopefully you're not one of those people who think 9/11 just happened with no actions from the U.S preceding it.
    By Red Leader @ 09/25/09 12:43:37 PMreport abuse
  • Sorry Neal,
    Timothy McViegh used what I would consider a WMD
    By mackman @ 09/25/09 12:29:11 PMreport abuse
  • @ Red Leader..
    Neal is right. We were talking about IED's and weapons of mass destruction, what is, and what isn't. Then you try to change the subject to something else, like immigration. Classic example of what Neal has told us all along.
    By Greg @ 09/25/09 11:07:15 AMreport abuse
  • @Greg
    Go to the source of why people would have such a reaction as 9/11. Rememeber 9/11 was indeed a reaction. Ask yourself, to what?

    Also the 9/11 hijackers were here on expired passports...why hasn't the federal govt done anything about the massive illegal alien problem in this country yet they expect us to believe they are worried about terrorists coming in to do harm. Things aren't adding up. Amnesty will make the war on terror arguement completly void.
    By Red Leader @ 09/25/09 10:53:23 AMreport abuse
  • @ Catseye...
    What if it is a threat to American lives and freedom? I think on of the best IED's (improvised explosive devices) I ever saw was a jet plane full of people and fuel.
    By Greg @ 09/25/09 10:37:32 AMreport abuse
  • Weak, weak argument dude
    You're just playing definitional games and you know it. An IED is not a "weapon of mass destruction", and if a few IEDs exist in a country thousands of miles away, that does not constitute a threat to our own homeland.
    By Catseye @ 09/25/09 10:05:36 AMreport abuse
  • @ Steve in Tulsa
    What military force was Saddam going to use to deliver a WMD to mainland America? If terrorists could have gotten a hold of the uranium or wanted to bring something into the country to do damage, then it becomes a border/passport/illegal entry issue no? Why haven't the Feds taken the first step yet in fighting these islamic nuts? Which is securing the border? In fact why do they want to reward potential terrorists with amnesty if the threat is so great?
    By Red Leader @ 09/25/09 09:42:51 AMreport abuse
  • Weapons of Mass Destruction
    Hmmm that sentence about renting a truck to make into a bomb sound eerily familiar doesn't it? Seems to me like that was used before at another place. Oklahoma City perhaps? Maybe the government got the facts all wrong about Oklahoma City and blamed the wrong group of people. It would not be the first time that happened.
    By Stan25 @ 09/25/09 09:36:44 AMreport abuse
  • Only problem is the Left's ever shifting sands of Lies and double standards.
    The only flaw is that with the Leftist's ever changing set of Lies and double standards, “Weapons of mass destruction “ doesn't Mean the SAME thing as it did, say 5 years ago.

    Then, it did mean an NBC type weapon, now it can mean whatever the SCM wants it to mean.

    See how the Leftists use a constant barrage of Lies and double standards to advantage?
    By ACE @ 09/25/09 09:30:55 AMreport abuse
  • America solidifying the islamic fascist cause...
    ...its true. American military presence in the middle east is helping to unite islamic fascists. The troops presence their is a convenient and efficient recruitment tool also. Just think about it..if Islamic Fascists were to come to America, try to force Shari'a law on Americans, started building military bases on American soil and started redrawing the geo-political lines American would be angry. Why do Americans NOT expect these muslims to be angry? The fundamentalist muslims(notice I didn't say radical muslims) are the ones crazy enough to blow up buildings, they are using American military presence as a scape goat to turn the more regular muslims into fundamentalists. There is absolutely no point in talking about fighting islamic fascists if the same people that say there's a threat REFUSE to secure the border and send illegal aliens home in droves. Boortz never mentions the blatant irony in American foreign policy, so I will keep at it everytime Boortz posts about terrorism but fails to address the American foreign policy that is adding to the fire. Always remember 9/11 was a reaction to provocation, the only way to say it was not is to say that Americans would be completely fine with Muslims coming over here and building military bases on American soil and redrawing the geo-political lines. Sorry just the unavoidable ugly truth of it. Yes fundamentalist islam is by default violent, why give more secular muslims a reason to turn to it?
    By Red Leader @ 09/25/09 09:23:13 AMreport abuse
  • Don't forget
    We removed 500 TONS of yellowcake from Iraq once we had deposed Saddam. But that didn't count for some reason...
    By Steve in Tulsa @ 09/25/09 09:19:14 AMreport abuse
  • Foolish Wolf Biltzer
    Also noted from Blitzer.... something along the lins that "police were using "CHEMICAL AGENTS"against a CNN "reporter" @ the G20.. JERK!
    By Charlie @ 09/25/09 09:12:09 AMreport abuse
  • I thought of the same thing
    I heard the news report on the Radio last night. And I thought, If the Left is saying "IEDs" are Weapons of Mass Destruction, then Bush was Right!!!! Dumb, Ignorant Left....
    By Shawn @ 09/25/09 09:09:01 AMreport abuse
  • Wolf Blitzer?
    He scored NEGATIVE $4,600 points (that's -$4600) on Jeopardy while someone named Andy Richter..I think he used to Conan's cohost..walloped Wolf with $37,000. LMAO- I guess Wolfy's too busy reading 'the news' to actually ever take the time to 'read'.
    By Randy @ 09/25/09 09:05:25 AMreport abuse
  • Neal loves government
    Bush(government) sent the military(government) into Iraq(government operation). This again proves my point that republicans are hypocrites as usual and love government. No wonder people dont trust them. Hopefully they learned their lesson last election. My guess is not. Oh how did Bush(government) and the military(government) afford all of this? Oh yeah, taxpayers money. There, republicans love the government taking theiur money to prevent car bombs in baghdad rather than giving Americans tax cuts.
    Why do republicans love government and taxes so much?
    By Jimmy Dolan @ 09/25/09 09:01:43 AMreport abuse
  • Neal- Pretty Weak
    That is a pretty weak argument here. I'd rather point the finger at the idiot media outlets for reporting arrests for people creating WMDs.

    By the way, the lamestream-media is a Weapon of Mass Confusion!
    By Matt @ 09/25/09 09:00:16 AMreport abuse
  • At this point I now demand....
    At this point, I respectfully (not really) demand that everyone remove their bumpersticker that says "Bush lied, people died" Because, in fact, he did not lie!
    By Tre' @ 09/25/09 08:54:00 AMreport abuse
  • Gas cannisters
    I guess all those found in Iraq were WMD's too!!!
    By Joyce M/Blythe @ 09/25/09 08:52:38 AMreport abuse
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement