OK ... I need to take a time off from speaking to or writing for the more rational readers/listeners out there and address my liberal detractors. The rest of you can read along .. but this is such a basic lesson in logic that you may find it a bit plebian.

To my leftist bedwetting friends:

So, you got a little upset about my tweet yesterday, did you? Now let's see, what was it I said? Oh yeah ... here you go: "Obama on Wall Street today. That's like sending a child molester to speak to a kindergarten class."

Well, it didn't take long before you were chattering amongst yourselves. Yeah .. that evil right wing nutjob hate-filled radical right wing talk show host just compared your precious president with a child molester.

I'm not going to ask you if you're really that ignorant. I already know the answer to that one. I'm going to try to help, though, by explaining the construct of that sentence for you.

Now ... through your illogical liberal fog you are claiming to have read that tweet as comparing Obama to a child molester. Let's see if that is supportable.

The word "like" appears in the sentence. The appearance of that word would indicate that I'm comparing one action or object with another. Look at the word following "like." That word is "sending," not "Obama." Yup ... what I'm doing here is comparing an action, not a person. I'm comparing one action to another action, not a person to a person. What actions? The action of Obama going to Wall Street to the action of a child molester going to a kindergarten class. So your accusation that I'm comparing your God to a child molester is looking a little weak, isn't it?

The question remains; why would I see a comparison between Obama traveling to Wall Street to that of a child molester going to a gathering of children? That should be pretty easy, even for a logic-challenged liberal. That would be because I consider Obama to be just as much of a threat to Wall Street as I would a child molester to children.

Now I know this isn't going to make any difference to you. You know that your followers are every bit as challenged when it comes to logical thought as you are ... so you will continue to use this tweet to attack me. That's fine. When I'm not being attacked by blogs like ThinkProgress or Media Matters I start to worry that the content of my program isn't compelling enough. Your attacks serve as my validation. I just wanted you to see that your logic failures don't go unnoticed.