advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat

AMMO FOR YOUR LIBERAL FRIENDS

By
Neal Boortz
@ September 24, 2009 9:48 AM
Permalink | Comments (28) | TrackBacks (0)

Just wanted to start your day off with a little tidbit that you can be sure to pass along to your liberal friends who are oh-so-convinced that George Bush is still the reason for this country's problems. We've heard Barack Obama touting this line for months ... the war in Iraq is taking a serious toll on the economy. Well as it turns out, Barack Obama should look himself in the mirror. Here are the details.

The Congressional Research Service tells us that the total cost of the Iraq war under President Bush was $622 billion. Do you have any clue how much Obama is going to spend on welfare, treating America's parasite infestation, in just 2010 alone? Care to guess? Well ... let's try $888 billion. Yup, you got it. That's about $260 billion more than the cost of the Iraq war under Bush. And what will we get for that money? An entrenched welfare class, that's what. Our parasite problem will become even worse. Frankly, we got a lot more bang for the buck out of the war in Iraq.

Just trying to keep the truth. I mean, where else do you think you will find these facts ... the mainstream media??



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: AMMO FOR YOUR LIBERAL FRIENDS.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/44382

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • @Snarky
    Snarky it amazes me how liberals like you tend to be so arrogant. You throw comments around about how no one seems to be as intelligent as you, and yet....

    You are the one that has no concept of how or why a free market economy works.

    You are the one that does not have a basic understanding of the American Constitution, or what the founding fathers intended when they framed it.

    You are the one that doesn't understand your history, or what policies have been slowly bringing about the downfall of this country.

    You are the one that doesn't understand the major flaws with Communism.

    You are the one that doesn't understand basic human behavior....ie. what would inspire someone to excel at what he does.

    You are the one that thinks government is incorruptable and filled with people that are only looking out for what's best for you.

    You are the one that thinks government is filled with highly skilled, efficient workers even though you can't be fired from govt no matter how much you suck and have no incentive to outperform any one else at work.

    You are the one that constantly buys into the brainwashing that anything you do for someone else is good and anything you do for yourself is evil and greedy.

    Please....just go away. Again, I say, there are plenty of countries out there tthat already have the type of government you embrace. Why don't you just move? But you don't really want to do that because those places suck royally... How can you not understand that they are that bad because of the very things you so want to see happen here? Utterly amazing.
  • Promoting the general welfare.
    I am opposed to welfare period. The employment is available for those that would WANT to earn a wage greater than or equal to Welfare. Yet immigrants and teenager eagerly accept that employment. What an opportunity, earn your money and be industrious, or just take my money and do nothing.

    The "War for Oil" is not to protect our resources or access to it, but to satisfy Asian demand. WWII proved that when starved for resources Asian nations will strike. Making Iraq the lightening rod for Jihadists is safer than Beijing annexing Alaska in 25 years.

    If oil is limited on the world market, then the cost to produce in China would rise. If China's costs go up, affordable items (iphones included) would not be affordable anymore. I would have to give up more of my hard earned money to help the less fortunate pay for Chinese goods.

    IT IS A BETTER INVESTMENT TO SECURE THE WORLDS OIL MARKETS THAN PAY PEOPLE TO DO NOTHING.
  • It’s like blaming Reagan’s defense buildup for all our 1980-88 debt.
    He added $110 billion to defense, while over the same period, the dp controlled congress added over $700 billion to domestic spending. Yet the deficit was supposedly caused by by defense spending.

    Note: when it comes time to cut spending, the dp insists at least half the cuts come from defense spending.
  • reagm28b
    should we just call you houndog?

    go bark at someone else pup.
  • reliberalhater
    I save my best stuff for those who show some signs of intelligence.

    those folks are very few here...but they're here.

    so, you're really just commenting on you...and I, of course, agree. :-)
  • The Time Has Come
    Hey MockingBird I checked and it is time to change the Liberal Talking Points memo in the bottom of your bird cage. All of the crap you get from DailyKos et. al. must be getting harder to read with all of your droppings in the mix.
  • money mismanagement
    So your saying its better for the country to spend over a half trillion in a war of choice instead of at home for our own ...
  • mmm so close
    you're right in that neal is a hypocrite and poser - agreed.

    however, the reason he is, is simple: $

    It's more profitable to talk about things on the fringe of the GOP because there are more of them.

    the money is in the numbers and, sorry to say for you, the number of people who would listen to the things you've listed are small.

    Now, the sane understand and appreciate why those numbers are small but, that's a whole other conversation.

    But neal does what he does for ratings in his niche market - period.
  • Snarkybird
    Hey Snarky,
    Do you wear a helmet when you go to your special education class each morning? You have sounded like a retarded monkey for the entire time you've graced us with your worthless presence.
  • I love how...
    Boortz thinks he is not mainstream media puppet. In order to even get into the position him or Glenn Beck or Limbaugh are in they have to agree to never talk about certain subject matters on the air no matter how relevant they are. Hell I am sure that was in their contracts. Like how come Boortz doesn't take Ron Paul seriously? He has been right on every single issue dealing with the economy, but the mainstream media mocks him. The reason why Boortz doesn't give credit where credit is due is because it is off limits to talk about getting rid of the Federal Reserve or any of the other issues that Ron Paul's supporters are passionate about. I know that was sorta off topic, but I had to say something because it is becoming more and more apparent by the day that alternative media is DESTROYING the lamestream media. Take Alex Jones for instance. Glenn Beck is taking credit for things that Alex Jones has been harping on for years before Beck was even on the scene. That should tell you something. The only thing that has changed now is that Glenn Beck has signed his contract and now he has to stick to his script. A great example was when Beck went on Fox and Friends one morning and went off topic a little while they were filming live and he started talking about an investigative report he was doing on FEMA camps. He literally said that he was unable to debunk them and that his investigation would be aired that night. The Fox & Friends people were like "what is a FEMA camp". Beck got into it a little bit, but then left people hanging on for more for when his show aired later on that day. Well a funny thing happened. He went on his show that night and guess what? He COMPLETELY changed his story saying that the FEMA camps were not real and that it was irresponsible for him to talk about such things without supporting evidence. ROFLCOPTER! So what changed? That very morning he claimed the FEMA camps were a reality and that SAME DAY he later claims it was all bs. Yeah someone musta sat him down and told him to reread his contract. BTW the FEMA camps are pretty real. I have been to 3 of them. They exist and so do the FEMA coffins. FEMA says they are supposed to be used in a case when there is a large influx of illegal aliens into our country. Yeah okay I believe that. :(
  • Jamsey they are handicaped with being a lib LOL
    Snarkybutt solution to degress cost is to more than double the spending another word if something cost a $1.00 than making it cost $3.00 would decress the cost at least if you use liberal logic. This is what snarkybutt is using when sugesting reform that we as taxpayers would have to pay for.
  • Code Pinko
    I seem to remember that the code pink wackos were not only still around, but supported the town hall protestors because they were finally using their 1st ammendment rights. But I sure didn't hear it from the MSM!
  • the liberals' response
    unfortunately the liberals' response is, but that money is helping people, and you agree with that money going to help people then you don't like to help people and are probably racist
  • Deport the parsites to Cuba
    And we might solve the problem.

    After all, didn't Castro just praise Obama at the UN?
  • Sheehan
    And where's Cindy Sheehan? I wanna know how ole Cindy feels about Obama's illegal war.
    Where's the stinking hippy protesters? Where are those gutless cowards?
    By Big Joe Williams

    Actually, Cindy has been protesting the Afghan war also, but because the media is in love with Obama, they haven't been covering her antics!
  • @Red Leader
    Again, I agree with you entirely on closing the borders and sending the illegals home. But I still disagree that we shouldn't go after the suckers on their own turf. Squashing Afghanistan was necessary, not doing so would have made us look weak since the people that did 9/11 were organized, controlled, and supported from there and we knew it. After all, they could and did hit us from there; they may not have if we secured the borders, but nothing can be 100% secured. Iraq, I'm not sure I disagree with you about though.
    BTW, just out of curiosity. You see me as a Neo-con?
  • here's what I...............................
    NC CHIK............y'sterday you wanted to kno' why Spielburg was movin' to INDIA......it's the curry......silly girl.......
  • morons
    Lets add jimmy dopelan to the list of, lame and snarkybutt paid left wingers into this site, that are sooooooooo desperate to influence. Ignore them.
    They have no home or place to go.
    Must be an ego problem, cause they could surely go onto lib sites, but then they wouldn't think themselves so special. Hahahahaha. You've all been great about ignoring these mornons.
    Just what we needed more parasites on the welfare rolls. Lazy, good for nothings.
    Creek Woman
  • Re: Matt I agree with what you're saying, but no offense, could you leave race out of this.
    Race is irrelevant to the situation.

    As to the larger point, shouldn't we try something else besides flushing trillions down the toilet? Government redistribution of wealth doesn't work, we need a new plan.

    SB: Obama states that we can save billions on government programs by eliminating waste, fraud and abuse.

    Why don't we do that NOW?

    Why can't the taxpayers get that 'carrot' without having to deal with the 'stick' of Obamacare?
  • Barack "The Liar" Obama
    During the Presidential election, Obama ran on the PROMISE that he would withdraw our troops from Iraq within SIX MONTHS if he won the election. Well, here we are EIGHT MONTHS into his administration and troops are still in Iraq. I guess that makes Obama a LIAR!

    Obama also ran on the promise that he would end "Bush's Illegal War for Oil!". TWO MONTHS into his administration and Obama announces he is sending 17,000 more troops to the middle east. I guess that makes Obama a LIAR!

    And for EIGHT YEARS, liberals demanded that something be done about "BUSH'S OUT-OF-CONTROL-GOVERNMENT-SPENDING!". Well, in Obama's first eight months in office, he has spent more money than George W. Bush did in all EIGHT YEARS of his presidency. Where's the liberal outrage at Obama for his "OUT-OF-CONTROL-GOVERNMENT-SPENDING?"

    Why is Obama continuing to fight Bush's Illegal War for Oil?

    Obama lied! People Died!

    This is all happening on Obama's watch. For eight years, liberals said everything that happened with this country..."Happened on Bush's watch". Welp, according to the liberals own philosophy, this is all happening..."ON OBAMA'S WATCH"
    And where's Cindy Sheehan? I wanna know how ole Cindy feels about Obama's illegal war.
    Where's the stinking hippy protesters? Where are those gutless cowards?
  • Good posts...
    ...Matt and Red Leader.
  • 12 to 13 Trillion Spent....
    ...on the war on poverty. Has poverty been eliminated in the US? No. What would that 12 or 13 Trillion have done for the American people had it been placed in the hands of the private sector? I'm guessing unemployment would not be 10%.

    Liberal policies help no one. They create a sense of entitlement- which always leads to enslavement. The libs have created 12 to 13 Trillion Dollars worth of dependent slaves in America- all vote Democrat to keep the next meal on their table.

    One big exception, the slave master is the same color this go round. That is not meant to be a racist statement, rather, it should make you think. Keeping people on welfare isn't hope or change, and never allowing them to either sink or swim is cruel!
  • Welfare recipients
    based on the 70 million, give or take, households that actually pay federal income tax in the US...each household contributes (hahaha) $12,700 to our welfare recipients. that is just wrong.
  • America doesn't really benefit from either...
    Iraq is not a threat to America, never really was. Neither is Afghanistan really. Those guys never had any kind of military that could reach America. If them harboring terrorists was the case, then America should have first and foremost secured the borders which has not been done. Other countries harboring terrorists (with no capability to reach mainland America with military might)turns the islamic fascism fight into a border issue...pure and simple. Obviously Bush/Obama have no concern of islamic fascists coming in if the border is not secured with all illegal aliens heading home. Ironically Bush/Obama want to reward the possible terrorists that are here illegally with amnesty. If you are scared someone will come in to do harm to the country, then the entry point must be secured. Failing to do so makes the he whole 'war on terror' thing complete nonsense. Sorry. It simply defies logic. Just the unavoidable ugly truth.The Iraqi war seems to have been unnecessary if you are honest with yourself. At the same time increasing the parasite population in this country is equally as unwanted and dangerous. We could avoid both methods of waste by purging the neo-cons from the Republican party and making a return to traditional conservatism. The conservatism Thomas Jefferson and Ron Paul are aligned with....again the ugly unavoidable truth. For all those believing in neo-con mysticism on here please don't waste your time calling me names.It changes nothing.
  • joke
    this is a joke.

    notice where the article came from? that the link to the data doesnt work? that they dont even list what the money is being spent on but oh so subtly put in medicaid...

    gee, medicaid costs are going up?? who knew? if only our govt would enact some kind of reforms to bring costs down...

    oh wait...
  • Thanks for the ammo
    This is complete and total proof that republicans hate America and Americans. Obama is spending billions of dollars on the health of Americans, while republicans spend as much money as they can on Iraqis. Imagine if the money spent on Iraq went to America, wow, that would be something.

    Thanks Neal!
  • lane meyer from the movie better off dead
    two dollars, I WANT MY TWO DOLLARS!
  • Did all that largess ($888 billion) actually help those people?
    Spare me the extremely tired lines about good intentions or that the programs were under funded.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement