advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand

Nobody's listening.

HOW'S THIS FOR A CLOSE?

By
Neal Boortz
@ July 8, 2009 8:04 AM
Permalink | Comments (95) | TrackBacks (0)

Dr. Anne Wortham is the author of "The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness". She is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting Scholar at Stanford University 's Hoover Institution. She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association. Pretty strong credentials, don't you think?

In researching Anne Wortham I also found that she is a follower of Ayn Rand. That's why I haven't heard of her before. A black university professor who is a Rand fan?

Why bring her up? Because I've just come across a letter she wrote to her fellow Americans on November 6th of last year. I thought you might enjoy it ... so here goes:

Fellow Americans,

Please know: I am black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a black president to love the ideal of America.

I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America, all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America. Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them. I would have to be wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.

I would have to believe that "fairness" is equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth.

Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism.

So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a black man to the office of the president of the United States, the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and that Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmie Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kennedy look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a black person. So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good. There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness.

November 6, 2008

There. Couldn't have said it better myself.



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: HOW'S THIS FOR A CLOSE?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/36130

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Your Letter About Obama
    For you , youcan earase all you need to and not share a joy but it is not just about a black man but the world over in racism the young thatget along and don't see color a big part of the world getting along , a little more equality has broken through because racism is as big and bright as the sun, Obama is not just a Black man but a man period and yes he is of color but he is smart and always thinking so for this america that we were forced into as Afro Americans and hated because of the color of our skin and not given an equal chance the majority finally looked past that and it has nothing to do withafirmative action so be it because that shows many blacks who don't have hope you can come up through the ranks hard working and make it with out people feeling sorry for you and yes you can just as much as anyone else it may take time butyou can and will be established the worl is changing and GOD is in controlwe as Blacks have been shot down for so long some find the only way is DRUGS ROBBERY and Killing but Obama gives hope to many and it may be a dream but it has helped many turn another way and if this is GOD's way of showing hope and a new path maybe many of our Black brothers won't over crowd the jails and be in the system and stand up with a new look on life to stand for their family and do what is right. not all people need something but many do need an example just a little glimmer besides after being put down for so long and seeing one make it who is Black but not just because he is Black sets anexample for those who used the cop out race card!!!!!
  • @ Copyleft
    "I suggested that free-market cheerleaders and Randroids might be happier in the collapsed, regulation-free mess that is the former USSR."
    Once again, liberals attack a capitalism straw-man, rather than the real thing.
    Capitalism requires a stable government to enforce contracts, punish criminals, etc.
    These tasks are not "regulation" of an economy, it is defending individual rights.
    A collapsed government is not regulation free, it is regulated by whatever thug holds the guns this week, and that is not compatible with capitalsim.
  • As a candidate for President of the U. S., Norman Thomas said, in a 1944 epoch speech:

    "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of "liberalism", they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." He went on to say: "I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform."

    How true this is now.
  • What is your definition, Big Africa...?
    Curious about one of your earlier statements: just how do you define 'Neocon'? Just what and who do you think they are? I get the sense that you are just mimicking a commonly used derogative term. MANY do.

    P.S. (not about you, BigAfrica..) All of you please take note of how the 'progressives' (LOL) always defend their silly positions by attacking others through the use of defamatory names like 'wingnuts'... or usually much worse... Klan members certainly comes to mind. Fanatics. Extremists. Naxis. Racists. "pig ignorant". What a shame... so much pseudo intellect going to waste! Certainly they could better spend their time at some protest march or online at Daily Kos or Democrat Underground where they get all the 'true facts' and expand their intellect....... ROFLMAO!!!
  • Dr. Anne Wortham
    This lady is amazing, She is a credit to her race, her country, and to all humanity. Thanks so much for sharing Neal.
  • Increase in voters
    Joyce I have the answer, ACORN, lol
  • One last thing copyleft
    I never said America was inherently conservative. In fact most Americans don't fit either category. I would say most Americans just want the Goverment out of their pockets, out of their lives, and protecting the border. Which ironically is what the Constitution says is their job...which is contradictory to what your "Liberal" politicians do everyday.
  • @ Copy
    I can't believe you took the bait on the cognitive thing...what a tool! In your case it IS resonance because that's all you do--resonate daily kos talking points! And yes, I stand by my comment that you're a commie--which you don't even bother to deny!
  • To Copyleft..
    I didn't debate the definition of liberal. Pull your head out of your ass and re-read what I wrote.

    I said the context in which you stated the word liberal is in the sense of teh actual definition.

    But your so called Democrats run as liberals but do not endorse liberal policies. So as the world turns your party is changing the definition of what liberal means. Or you can look at it from the point that they want you to believe they are liberal (the actual definition) but are really Marxist and Statists (which is what thier policies reflect). Hence my dog is a dog regardless of if you call it a cat analogy. Please think before you post. YOu are not speaking to one of your libtard buddies who just pumps thier fists and spouts off the last thing Keith Olberman has said.
  • Well Done!
    A very intelligent missive. Also very true.
  • What is really funny is watching Fauxbama lama jama jama in the slamma's steadily drop and Obamadolts get desperate and shrill about it.
    (snicker.. snicker)
  • Awesome
    I love it when all the leftys come over and disagree with other posts yet have very little to say about the content of the article. Good job at getting all the liberal panties in a twist everyone. Keep going, the truth is painful.
  • To: Joyce
    Typo, fair enough. I'll delete the word "business."

    Now, where did you pull that fantasy from, where the Constitution specifies the intended size of our government?

    And more importantly, how did the size of government relate to what I said about America being a liberal country with a strong focus on individual liberty?

    (I know where it came from, of course. It came from the Randroid assumption that "freedom is incompatible with government." But that's just libertardian nonsense. To the rational person, there is no contradiction.)
  • The Democrats labeling themselves as 'Liberal' is their #1 Lie.
    Look at their agenda – where the H*ll does 'Liberty' – as implied by the term 'Liberal' factor into it?
  • RIGHT ON!
    I do agree with Alabamastan's post (it's somewhat lazy to say that blacks only voted for Obama cause he's black), but I gotta love this woman because she's a proud RON PAUL supporter. Also note that an intelligent, eloquent lady such as this wouldn't vote for McCain/Palin.

    Neal, thanks for posting this!
  • Now see
    I started to make a post saying to disregard the typos in my post but I thought nah, they'll figure out what I meant. There's another typo in there just in case you want to nitpick somemore.

    So, Copygirl, since you only see what you want I'll tell you: take out the word business, my mind was getting ahead of my fingers.

    And yes, anyone who has read the writings of the founding fathers or understands the constitution knows that we were designed to be a small government.

    geez
  • Regarding my last post
    I should have checked the dates before I wrote that post. The 2008 election took place on November 4th. Dr. Wortham wrote this letter on November 6th.

    She did have time to think about what she wanted to write.

    And I still feel the same about her chosen words. She has passion!
  • Ann Wortham
    This lady is brilliant. No one could have said it better.
  • So much confusion, so little time
    I see that many of the wingnuts are scared and confused today. I'll try to clear it up for you, using small words...

    Jeff: "Why do the left want to ruin the US when there are other countries that they could move to today and have what they want?"
    Why do you assume we want to "ruin" the U.S. simply because we feel differently on political issues than you do? If it helps, I'll be glad to assume that far-right conservatives secretly (or openly) want to "ruin" the U.S. just because they're wrong all the time. Is it a deal?

    CarrieB: Mark already explained how you got the hypocrisy argument backwards. Neal is on record as regularly sneering at anyone with a liberal-arts degree, much less philosophy or sociology. I've made no demands of anyone with such a degree--certainly not expecting everyone in academia to "repeat the leftist line," as you smugly and incorrectly assume. Bottom line: Neal is hypocritical when it serves his political agenda.

    Navy Buckeye: If you'd like to debate the definition of "liberal," I'm all for it. As a first step you can abandon the absurd claim that America is inherently "conservative," especially when so many supposedly 'conservative' voters keep electing Republicans who turn out not to be "conservative" at all... at least, when you hear their post-mortem excuses.

    $mooth Operator: "By unintentionally equating American "progressives" to unreconstructed Soviet Communists you admit what your ideological goals are."
    Only in your fevered imagination, $O.. I suggested that free-market cheerleaders and Randroids might be happier in the collapsed, regulation-free mess that is the former USSR. How you got "I love communism" out of that is your problem, not mine.

    Oh, and it's cognitive DISSONANCE, not resonance.

    Scott: "You obviously live by the philosophy...."
    Keep up with those assumptions, I'm sure that's much easier than making an argument.

    Joyce: "America is set up as a small government business"
    Huh? Where'd you pull that fantasy from? Our country was never set up as a business, small or otherwise. And when was the intended size of government spelled out in the Constitution?

    ACE: "Here we have a letter from a person that the left deems the only group “allowed” to criticize Fauxbama for obvious reasons."
    Wrong on all counts, ACE. Anyone's allowed to criticize Obama. It's just an amusing coincidence that most of those who do have turned out to be pig-ignorant wingnuts so far.

    Tony: No, as Alabamastan already pointed out, she was ASSUMING that people could only have voted for Obama out of ignorance, because "only ignorant people would vote differently from me." It's a common delusion of the right-wing extremist. Maybe we'll find a vaccine someday....

    Lots of fun, folks! I'm enjoying the harpooning of right-wing idiocy during a slow work week. Let's do it again real soon. (chuckle)
  • Aunt Tom
    Brilliant conservative black woman....what else could she possibly be, other than an Aunt Tom?
  • It is clear
    that Dr. Ann Wortham has passion. She wrote this letter on the night Obama was elected. Her words reflect what she felt at that moment.

    She did not hesitate; she wrote because she had to write.

    If she had waited, mulling it over, she would have changed the words.

    I am glad she didn't.
  • Dr. Wortham
    Neal needs to schedule her for an on-air interview NOW!
  • To A Pub Def
    You put a helluva spin on that column...you must be a bowler.

    It's assesments such as yours that prove the mental laziness of Obama worshippers.
  • Anne Wortham
    I first heard of Doctor Wortham in the late 1980s & to the best of my knowledge she is a serious committed objectivist which would make her quite an admirable liberal in the rightful old fashioned sense that imprimis validated, explicated & justified laisser faire capitalism, aristocratic constitutional republicanism, international free trade, state rights via honest federalism, the gold specie standard, prohibition of onerous taxes, diplomatic neutrality in an ever dangerous world, rejection of militarism & imperialism, reliance on custom & voluntarism to produce general bourgeois culture & civility & isonomy, the mandate of equality in a polity of every one therein unto the law. Why Boortz, whose own notional intellectual debt to Ayn Rand & objectivism never seems to be properly honored, lets on his show shady characters such as Gingrich whom I would not trust 5 minutes alone in a locked room with a white hot stove when he could have heroes & heroines such as Ron Paul & Anne Wortham, will continue to perplex me til Boortz himself explains.

    Note to Boortz: there was libertarianism before the Cato Institute & the early Cato Institute was a commenable endeavor given the influence of co-founder Murray Rothbard but I rarely find you praizing or citing the sort of purist organization such as the Foundation for Economic Education, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, the Liberty Amendment Committee, the Ayn Rand Institute, LewRockwell.com or AlanStang.com where you will find the like of Anne Wortham, Murray Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises, Ron Paul, Llewllyn Rockwell, Alan Stang, Edward Griffin, Jack Metcalf & George Reisman, to name some of my most admired far right figures living & dead, favorably quoted & honored; all your guest time is reserved for imperialists, corporatists, militarists, neo-conservatives, war lovers, zionists & other compromizers or out-right denigraters of the principles vital to libertarianism, old fashioned liberalism, objectivism & individualist arch-ultra conservatism--why, Boortz? what have you against gaining some net ground for your professed beliefs? is it the recurring isolationist & at least tacit conspiracist influence in many of the groups that are truer to your stated convictions? Be more like Anne Wortham & stay consistent.
  • Liberal=Liberty LOL
    Copyleft, the only liberties liberals believe in are Gay marriage, drug use, and abortion. Every other aspect of the liberal agenda is ment to control the populace.
  • what if sides were switched?
    I took it as she was trying to state that the majority of blacks that voted for him was because he was black and not his stance on the subjects.

    What if was the other way around? How many obama supporters would still have voted for obama/biden if they ran on the republican ticket and mcCain/palin ran on the democrat ticket. Obama/biden running on "conserative"/non-liberal ideals and mcCain/palin were running on liberal ideals chanting "yes we can" and "change"? I bet the majority of those voters would still have voted for obama, same with the majority of liberals here. Most voters out there only vote on the how the canidate looks, which is probably why mcCain needed palin to offset him.

    So I bet you still would have voted for obama if he was a republican throwing your liberal ideals to the wind!
  • credentials
    Neal probably put those there knowing you people would tear her apart if she didn't have anything to back up her assertions.

    durned if you do, durned if you don't
  • Funny...
    Hmmm, A Pubic Defender,

    Last time I checked Obama was campaigning against McCain. What parallel universe had Palin as the presidential nominee?
  • Votes Cast
    2008: 125,225,901
    2004: 121,068,715
    2000: 101,455,899

    (not counting third party votes)

    Well I don't think the population has grown that much so something must account for this major increase in votes cast.
  • She voices something that has always been a lesson to me.
    If you don't understand your freedom and it's origins, you can't protect and keep it. After even such a long and hard struggle to free themselves from private owners and inequality, many black people will willingly enslave themselves to public ownership in the same generation they won full equality. That's a cautionary tale whatever your race or culture.

    Now, if unlike many Libertarians, she's as observant and astute on foreign policy...
  • praying
    Oh God please forcibly add Dr. Anne Wortham to his cabinet so she can tell him every day why he was elected. He doesn't have the strength for what's coming and it's clear that she does. Amen.
  • Re: Mark
    “The old saying is true as far as I can tell "I don't belong to any organized political party - I'm a democrat"

    LOL, are you sure that wasn't referring to the Republican party?


    Seriously, what's wrong with that letter?


    Certain people voted for Fauxbama not based on the content of his character, but based on the color of his skin – that's racism. It doesn't matter that it was a positive affirmation, if it was based on skin color, that was wrong.

    The big mistake a lot of people made was that he was voted in for all the wrong reasons, and we're all going to have to pay for it.
  • To A Public Defender
    She was trying to state that the majority of people out there don't know crap about politics so when a number of 94% of black voters voted for obama, the logical reason is that he is black. If they knew anything about what his stance was on many issues they wouldn't have voted for him, as she didn't.

    There there is a small percentage of people, like you, who voted for him because you didn't want a white woman in office...or maybe a white woman other than hillary. So I guess that makes you a sexist! Nice thought process on voting. What exactly did you even like about obama? Most of his voters had no clue and will still be in denile on every bad thing that happens from the government and will either blame it on past administration, or my favorite, we won you lost sit and shut up now for the next four years.
  • Her premise is wrong
    I don't agree with her premise that black people voted for Obama because he's black. Did over 90% of black people vote for John Kerry in 2004 because HE'S black? Obviously not. Black people overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, no matter the color. Did some white people vote for Obama because of his color? Possibly, but that wasn't the overriding reason for most. I think the reason most people voted for Obama was that he was a total break from 8 years of Bush and his cronies.

    So while claiming to not be race conscious, she proves she is.
  • re:ACE
    Well, I dunno about Copy but..for me, there's so much wrong with this letter it's like staring into a black hole...

    I am glad it makes you feel good.

    I disagree with it and yes, neal's touting of her credentials was an easy target - for me anyway.

    I dont understand though why you think "the left" has this view that only certain people "can" disagree with Obama? The whole "lockstep" thing is usually a right wing thing.

    the old saying is true as far as I can tell "I dont belong to any organized political party - I'm a democrat"

    I can't tell you how frustratingly true that is! We can't even agree on things we agree on! LOL!
  • @Navy Buckeye
    Well said. If it walks like a communist and talks like a communist, it's a progressive. I don't think Copy has the ability to recognize cognitive resonance anyway.
  • Sigh, CL is starting to get embarrassing to herself and the rest of the Statist elite
    Here we have a letter from a person that the left deems the only group “allowed” to criticize Fauxbama for obvious reasons.

    And she rips them a new one over and over, and the best that CL can come up with is to whine about Neal's discussion of her credentials.

    Pitiful, pretty pitiful.
  • Klan
    I love it when lefties try to equate Republicans with the Klan. Check out your US history. The Klan was founded by Southern Democrats.
  • Not so fast Copygirl
    America is a republic, set up as a small government business with the power at the individual level. You yourself have said you don't have a problem with big government. Change your mind? Are you suddenly FOR small government?

    Small goverment means being responsible for yourself, how does that fit into your Liberal mindset?

    America a liberal country? You are insane. It didn't start out that way, but you and your lib buddies are pushing it that way and you refuse to recognize that none of what your liberal government wants to do will be possible without the producers of the country. Somebody has to pay your bills and if you keep pushing out producers so they keep closing down, eventually the bank will be empty.

    Keep putting down free market, you'll suffer for it.
  • to CopyLeft
    You obviously live by the philosophy: "If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."

    I just hope that there will be few enough of your type that vote in the next election cycle.
  • dats a big number..........................................
    what she didn't say is................

    those 12 million really is 3 guys in chicago workin' fo' acorn............
  • So copygirl finally admits she's a communist
    Finally came out of the closet, didn't you? By unintentionally equating American "progressives" to unreconstructed Soviet Communists you admit what your ideological goals are.

    So when can we expect to see re-education camps, 90% income tax, truth squads, communal housing, environmental police--all of the things that surely must bring glee to the eye of a so-called American "progressive"?

    I'd say it's you who should be careful not to be hit by the door on your way out.
  • re:carrie B
    sorry, I get what you're saying but you're making my point.

    It's the fact that those credentials would get any stereotype at all from people like Neal that makes this silly and simply underscore his penchant for ideology over reality.

    I disagree with what this woman wrote but, it has nothing to do with her credentials - never would. But, for Neal - that will never be true.

    To me, she seems like a very intelligent person who is well accomplished who shares a viewpoint I disagree with for a variety of reasons. None of which have anything to do with her credentials. But, again, if this woman did espouse a liberal view, Neal would take those credentials as a joke and immediately discredit her opinion, regardless.

    Get it now?
  • black voters
    So, if I understand her column properly, she believes the only reason a black person could have voted for Obama was because he is black. And the only reason a white person could have voted for Obama is because he is black.

    And yet she claims that she is not race-conscious. After all, she voted for the white person (presumably because he is white).

    For what it's worth, I am a black right-leaning libertarian and my Obama vote was really a vote against Sarah Palin.
  • To Copyleft
    why do you stay in what has been known Center-Right country?"

    What country would that be? AMERICA is a liberal country, of course; always has been. Individual liberty and personal freedoms are the cornerstones of our LIBERAL foundation, Mr. Reardon.

    "Now, if you want some capitalist-worshipping deregulated economy, the former Soviet Union might be a good fit for you. Don't let the door hit ya on the way out! (chuckle)"-By Copyleft @ 07/08/09 11:31:45 AM

    I really want to call you names. Assault your lack of intellect and numerous other derogatory things...but your post is sad enough.

    Using the exact definition of liberal suits your case. The actual definition of liberal is as you use it in context.

    But..in America today...liberal politicians try to pass laws that exert more Government control over the people of this land. Remember there were many political stances through out history and they are constantly changing.

    You are being disingenuous with yourself if you want to believe that the actual definition of Liberal fits today's politicians that refer to themselves as such.

    You can call your dog a cat.....but in the end it is a dog. Regardless of what you want to believe.

    Your Democrat friends and allies run as liberals. To those of us that are educated we know what they are trying to do. It is propaganda at its worst.

    Your Obambi is a great example. He is a liberal Democrat. Yet all his policies are based on collective thinking, the masses for the masses, and government restrictions on everything...including higher taxes (and don't say he doesn't stand for that because that is exactly what the Cap and Trade entails). His policies fall far from the actual meaning of liberal. Yet you come on here spouting the definition....

    Once again...you can try to teach your dog to meow then call it a cat but in the end it is still a dog.
  • I couldn't agree with that any more.
    Outstanding!!
  • Soap Box time...
    The day racism is over in this country is when AMERICANS are chosen to run this country, not 'Latinos', "African Americans", "Whites" or any other "naionality". We are AMERICANS. If you feel a need to address yourself as anything other than that you need to make a decision on whether the US is the best place for you to live.
    All this crap about hyphenated nationalities is just another way to divide this country.

    If you were born here or came to live here LEGALLY you are AMERICAN.
    If you find that hard to deal with,
    find someplace to live that you can be proud of.
  • @Mark & CopyLeft
    Mark and CopyLeft:
    You two clearly don't get it. Neal brought up those "credentials" because they are exactly the kind of thing that liberals like you would fawn over. Normally, you'd see those credentials and think for sure you'd found someone to spout the Democratic party line.

    Then, he hits you with what you least expected: someone with *your* valued credentials who completely and totally disagrees with you, and with all of the hype.

    It's not Neal who is being hypocritical, it's you who are trying to escape your normal role of stereotyping and attacking the messenger because you can't possibly attack the message.
  • Wow
    brilliantly said
  • H. Reardon – Great question!
    Why do the left want to ruin the US when there are other countries that they could move to today and have what they want? If you want Socialized Medicine move to Canada or France. They got it and you will not have to fight for it. Just walk in and you’re ready to go.

    Oh wait, I know why these people don’t want to move to a READY MADE Socialist state – It’s because they do not want to give up the life style and the freedom that they have. They believe that they can keep this wonderful life style and HAVE A SOCIALIST state. But they are very sadly wrong. When we become a FULLY socialist state you will see the freedoms that you take for granted and your high life style taken away.

    Wake up folks……
  • "The Other Side of Racism: ... "
    Jimmy Carter with a tan.
  • To; H. Reardon
    "why do you stay in what has been known Center-Right country?"

    What country would that be? AMERICA is a liberal country, of course; always has been. Individual liberty and personal freedoms are the cornerstones of our LIBERAL foundation, Mr. Reardon.

    Now, if you want some capitalist-worshipping deregulated economy, the former Soviet Union might be a good fit for you. Don't let the door hit ya on the way out! (chuckle)
  • LOL
    Copy, I thought the EXACT same thing. Any other time those credentials would be fodder for laughter and mocking from Neal. Ah, the hypocrisy of ideologues.
  • Response to skh.pcola's post
    The 12 million may refer to the number of blacks who are registered to vote. That could have been made more clear in the piece. Here is a link to an article that draws me to that conclusion:

    http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=c22598f2e13ed9421a7933e8d9d25977
  • Big Africa
    Yes, she is awesome! I especially like the line "I do not require a black president to know that I am a person of worth".

    When we can all tell each other we are all worthy and quit telling some that "you need us to take care of you" then I will believe we have overcome the problems of race. We have continued to enslave blacks with the bad education in the inner cities and enabling entire generations living on welfare. Love to see men and women like Dr. Worthan speak their mind. Proud of you both.

    Ron Paul 2012
  • cbell.pcola@gmail.com
    my guess is she's referring to eligible voters.
  • Not ignored... ostracized.
    Big Africa wrote: "There are and have been many blacks out there who can think for themselves, its just that we do not have a presence in the media. If anything we are ignored."

    They don't ignore you, they ostracize you... can't have anyone freeing themselves from the plantation and inviting others to join them, can they?
  • cbell.pcola@gmail.com
    Of course, they're not all eligible to vote, are they? So, as usual, instead of debating the topic, someone tries to attack the messenger by nitpicking this easily defendable point.
  • statistic response
    cbell-

    I think she is referring to 94% of the 12 million blacks that actually voted not the entire black population. I think her numbers are accurate.

    -Michael
  • "cbell.pcola@gmail.com
    Her sociology and philosophy credentials show when she says, "94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country." Blacks comprise about 13-14% of the population, putting the number around 40 million or so. Not that it makes much of a difference, but that's a glaring error in an otherwise spot-on opinion piece."

    Not all black people voted, only 12 million voted. Of those 12 million that voted, 94% of them voted for Barrack Obama.

    I enjoyed reading her essay. She is a very intellegent black woman... (insert sarcastic remark) time to put her in the back of the bus or under the bus according to the brain dead liberals.
  • 1 good 1 bad...
    Good
    You quoted a supporter of(AAGGHH!!) RON PAUL....OMFG!!!!

    Bad
    You think being a sociologist qualifies credentials...agh...
  • Anne Wortham
    Simply put....BRILLIANT!!!
    I am thrilled to see that more and more blacks, including myself are speaking up and not hiding in the shadows because we don't support "Obama-mania" nor are we Obamaholics.

    It has nothing at all to do with race but everything to do with liberty, freedom and individuality.
  • Ron Paul.........
    Wow Neal...are you coming around to traditional conservatism and leaving this whole 'police the planet' to the tune of bankruptcy neo-con Patriot Act mysticism behind? One can only hope. The traditional Ron Paul republicans are going to need all the help we can get in the next 2 elections to defeat Chairman Teleprompter. Putting up moderate democrat fascism leanig candidates like Bush and Mccain who are also in love with empire and enlarging the federal govt is not going to work inthe future.....as Dr. Anne Wortham so well spokenly displayed by writing in Ron Paul.
  • "The Other Side of Racism"
    I just checked Amazon.Com. It's available only in hardcover (published in '81) with only 5 used copies available starting at $216.42! Must be good reading! Time for a re-release I say!
  • cbell.pcola
    I guess it takes a bit of thought to understand she was talking about black VOTERS.
  • cbell.pcola@gmail.com
    Her sociology and philosophy credentials show when she says, "94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country." Blacks comprise about 13-14% of the population, putting the number around 40 million or so. Not that it makes much of a difference, but that's a glaring error in an otherwise spot-on opinion piece.
  • Anne Wortham
    This is the kind of human being I can get behind and support for president. Wortham/Sowell 2012?
  • Open Letter
    Amen. 'Nuff said!
  • Question for Copyleft, Stan Gable, and Hugo's Ghost
    I have a question for people like Copyleft, Stan Gable, and Hugo's Ghost.
    If you love the leftist philosophy, why do you stay in what has been known Center-Right country? There are several countries that have adopted a leftist Socialist Philosophy that can accomodate you?

    I am purplexed as to why you don't embrace the leftist lifestyle by moving to a country that is setup under a Socialist regime.

    If anyone can help me out with this question, I would be most appreciative.

    As for me, I am in progress of implementing my "Galt protection plan".
  • @Copyleft
    Kinda like you lefties have no use for a Repulican or Conservative unless they happen to agree with you huh CopyL? Can't you come back with anything that makes sense and might spark intelligent conversation. What's next? Perhaps you'll use "I'm rubber and you're glue..."
  • Ron who?
    Amazing, a positive Ron Paul bit on Boortz's site! I'm suprised he allowed it really. Neal must be so blined by so-called "conservitism" that the name Ron Paul must not have even registered when he seen it
  • Really?
    Does she have any sisters?
  • beautiful letter
    i wish i'd been spammed by this letter- and that is was front page on newspapers, myspace, facebook, etc.....
  • Ms Wortham
    Did'nt Ayn Rand say "the smallest minority group is the individual."
  • Black Racism
    Racism in this country will finally come to its end when there is an electoral choice between a Black candididate and a White candidate and the Black electorate elects the White candidate on the basis of qualifications and not on the basis of color. Only then will Blacks have matured to the point that they have cast off the last shackle of their history.
  • re: Stan Gable
    Way to play the race card, Stannie. When you can't win the debate, break out the race card! Liberals, can't live with em, can't put them through the chipper...
  • Amen
    This woman's got some BALLS!!!
  • Neal changes direction again
    I laughed out loud when I read this part:

    "She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association. Pretty strong credentials, don't you think?"

    WOW. This is a historic occasion. This would be the very first time, EVER, that Neal has proclaimed a sociologist and philosopher to be "impressively credentialed."

    You see, he usually HATES such useless academic professions... unless one happens to agree with him, of course.

    Don't you wingnuts ever get tired of all that spinning? It explains your dizziness and confusion, of course... but it makes OTHERS nauseous.
  • Nail… head…
    Outstanding is the least I can say! It is understandable why logic does not hold kindly to the pandering class.
  • Stereotypes
    Amazing... Stan will spout off about "Klan University" yet has no moral dilema with impuning entire groups of people.

    Why? Because he has a "higher calling". Killing is only murder when the victim is cared about...
  • Dr. Wortham
    Wow!
  • Anne Wortham
    It would behoove that woman to hire someone to taste her food and start her car. We're talking about King Hussein after all.
  • I would have never thought I would have heard the situation of last November put so eloquently by a modern scholar. I certainly would have thought them all to be raging liberals -- and happily, I am wrong. Bravo Dr. Wortham, bravo!
  • Colleges
    Those are some fine colleges + universities she mentioned. My guess is most republicans barely got a 3.0 out of klan university
  • KT
    There are and have been many blacks out there who can think for themselves, its just that we do not have a presence in the media. If anything we are ignored.
  • Over-aged Hippies
    I knew those folks hadn't all gone communal. Let em have their day in the sun. When 'That one's' term is over and MSNBC is falling all over itself to proclaim his 'legacy', all the 'Progressives' will be trying to distance themselves from the calamity that will be Obama's Presidency. It's great that a Black man can become President, we are a nation of many ethnicities. But an inexperienced guy who barely made rollcall in his Senate seat and who recycled the Clinton era while believing that bigger spending deficits will save us and the world wants to be his friend is causing more harm than we can reverse( if we can reverse it)in a decade. My older sister is a sweet lady, but sadly misinformed, bitter and cynical beyond the pale over the Bush years, and typical of a generation that never seemed to grasp the idea that it's possible to overcompensate for the bad old days. Making a bad choice and using moral equivalency to justify that choice isn't 'Change'. Sometimes you just need to take a step back. That time would have been the day before the last election. Too late now, eh?
  • Most Excellent!
  • Anne letter
    Boortz,
    I wish I just got that letter. I've been spammed by it for the last six months.
  • incredible
    Wow - I would love to sit down and chat with this woman -- AMAZING letter... SHE should take over ACORN and put it on the right path
  • Anne Wortham's message to Americans
    She is me. I just wish there was a note of hope.
  • Very well said
    It's nice to see some African-Americans (or blacks, if you prefer to not use the hyphenated term) that can think for themselves...
  • Mouthful
    WOW. Nuff said.
  • Dr. Anne Wortham
    Dr. Anne Wortham has my vote. What a succinct, on-target, well-written powerful statement!
  • Well put
    Well put Dr. Wortham. Unfortunately, as a people, we are not interested in truth, prosperity or even survival. We are animals.
  • RON....PAUL...awesome!!!!!!
    I stopped myself within the first 2 lines of reading.Boy was I thrilled. I am a black man who supported Ron Paul also in the last election also....and will NEVER support another neo-con Bush/Mccain/Cheney Patriot Act type EVER again in my life.At worst I'll in Paul's name for every election if there is not a Paul type running.

    Guys be sure to check out campaign for liberty online, Ron Paul's ideas are THE ONLY ones that are going to save this country. Boortz thanks for posting this article.....needless to say I will be following Anne Wortham from here on out. Hey Copy Left what do you think of blacks who are outright against Obama and did not vote for him? I know the liberals in this country like to pretend people didn't vote for Obama because of racism. How do you explain blacks then that don't like Obama? Why do I suspect Copy Left that your answer to me might include the sad, weak argument of 'uncle tom'...
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement