Funny you should cit the Constitution. THE ONE has shredded it several times already.
He nominated Senator Hildabeast for Secretary of State, a direct violation of Article 1 Section 6:

No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

He made a power grab to control the U.S. Census.
The census is written into the Constitution. In Article I, Section 2 the US Constitution orders that:

“The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.”

When he implemented the AIG bonus tax, he violated Article 1, Section 9, Clause 5

“No bill of Attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.”

and

Article 1 Section 10

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

You can add the numerous taxation without represtentation stunts, as well.

PrezBo is using the Constitution for toilet paper, and he’s just getting started.

I'd just as soon Japan and Germany not rearm, even if it does cost us extra and we get little thanks for defending them. I can understand arguments either way, but that's where the safest money is over the long haul.

When plants and animals, etc quit using self-defense to protect themselves, then humans can follow suit.

A little help here. Is there anytime in human history that would validate the president's statement?

Ivan.....some times I think you have gone 'round the bend....... yet on the other hand you make me stop and think.......thanks, My brain needs the 'xersize.....

the world will always.....always..... need armys and navys if not for fightin' then for securing and rebuilding.

I would not argue with you about new weapons systems......'cuz I'm not in the loop. I still have contacts that are serving that are in the loop tho......

if they ever told me 'bout sumpin' that was spooky secret I would have to kill 'em, and they know it!

technology today moves faster than the speed of thought............so no arguing with you just healthy skepticism.

where the hell is that ice you were 'sposed to bring.......

So how does he think this country was founded? Did we win our freedom in some political debate? Some affirmative action committee in England?

cowboy.....ease up on us 5th graders.....I can answer most of the questions on foxworthy's show.....some times.......

let's make this clear.... osamabama is a dumbass! his controllers on the other hand are some smart sum bitches.......

oh copylift.....japan and germany, both got their asses kicked in da big one, were re-built almost from the ground up after the smoke cleared. now why would they be so successful these days???

they don't need large armies or navies, they got us!!!!

Before we allow our leadership to remove our protections (Army and buried missiles), at least try an experiment on a smaller scale. Disarm and disband the police forces so all the criminal elements will like us better and change their ways. Some good starting points would be Chicago, LA, Detroit and Washington DC. After a year or two we should be able to measure our success and see if we want to apply the template on a larger scale.

What do you mean neal,"too easy. Much too easy"? It's EASY to see that the question you pose thereafter is not consistent with the quote you've provided by Obama. His statement doesn't imply not keeping an army or maintaining national security through military means. It does seem however, to suggest that by 'gathering armies' (taking control of other nations) leaves for perhaps if any future, one that is short-lived.

Mind Control...Weather Control...UFO Cloaking... Wow Ivan, this is really a "one weapon does it all. One note though, Most Physicists I have read think this guy Bearden? is a first class crackpot

Once again, just to be able to stir up the ignorant people that follow you, you misrepresent the truth. Everything has to be wrong because Obama is not a right wing neocon like you. You start with this ridiculous premise and then twist reality to match your predetermined failed ideology. This appealing to the least informed and getting them outraged over false assumptions may get you ratings, But your fans are mindless victims and you are a disservice to our country. You are to transparent to consider your fans anything but gullible fools.

Come onnnn, give the halfwit a break. He's just trying to make a few profound statements that will be remembered for all time. As stupid as it was, I know I'll remember it.

You are right about the good things that this country does, but you are absolutely wrong about the US not being an empire builder. Our empire is vast and we have influence EVERYWHERE. When we don't like an elected world leader we oust them and plant someone whom we can depend on to carry out our agenda worldwide. For you to make that comment is hilarious to say the least.

You guys don't get all upset about this comment by Obama. He is hinting at something else. There is a reason we are talking like this with Russia. Our nuclear stockpiles have been a great show of force in the past, but the real truth is that a nuke is no longer the weapon you need to be worried about.

I know for a fact that any ICBM fired by one of our enemies will never reach an American city. Our scalar weapons systems would down the missle before it even left the airspace of the country that fired it. That is the reality of scalar weapons.

I know for a fact that Russia and the US have the technology to fire off these scalar weapons and bring down entire cities in a matter of minutes. This technology is pretty advanced and is being constantly improved upon by DARPA.

These missle defense sheilds that Russia is so upset about is scalar. It does not involve rockets of any kind. The weapon system is housed inside of a dome-like structure similar to Doppler radar. It emits a high intensity wavelength that is bounced off the ionosphere and directed at a ground target or it can be used to down a target in the air.

The US takes steps to defend itself from attack using some very interesting countermeasures. One of the main countermeasures is to spray barium salt aerosols into the air that cause these high intensity wavelengths to reflect back into space. It is not a 100% effect countermeasure, but it lessens the severity of an attack.

Our Army is using a very effective portable version of this technology called the active denial system for use on large crowds for crowd control. In just a couple seconds they can heat the surface of your skin to the point where it feels like you are being scalded by boiling water. The Active Denial System is a form of scalar technology.

Of course I could go on and on about this technology cause it is that damn cool. We are about to enter into a brand new era of weapons technology.

Why don't we disarm ourselves and get Isreal to do the same, then see how long either country exists anymore. Armies aren't relevant? You idiots need to understand there are some very bad people in this world that would blow you away in a heart beat, they don't want to sit around the campfire singing folk songs with you, they want you dead! If the US was raising and Army to build Empire's why are we so concerned with leaving Iraq. Why didn't we just keep Kuwait when we liberated that country? Try this little experiment at your house. Put a sign in your yard that says you are unarmed and have one million dollars cash on your kitchen table. Write us back and tell me how that worked out for you.

I don't have the time or space to refute all of them, so let's just go with the most egregious! Japan and Germany lost WWII, and the victor, instead of colonizing them, rebuilt their countries. America is exactly the opposite of an empire builder.

"Blessed are the meek,for they shall inherit the earth"....yeah,traditionaly a 3'x6'x6'deep plot of earth with a stone marker saying what a wonderful loser they were.

Another bit of wisdom that flies right over the ignorant wingnuts' heads. As usual.

Some simple facts: Armies are useless in fighting terrorism.

The U.S. Army protects the U.S., and yet nobody has invaded or attacked us. (Note: Al Qaeda is not equal to Iraq.)

Japan and Germany LOST WW2, and they're major world powers thanks to their economic activity.

The USSR had an enormous military budget and tradition... and they collapsed due to economic problems.

China was barely a survivor of WW2--and they own most of America's debt today.

Armies were relevant back when there were international wars. Now, not so much.

The neocon tactics of "fearmongering to promote empire" have simply failed, Neal. There are bigger issues to concern us today.

Get the U.S. army back to protecting America from the few military threats that still exist, and quit pretending they're the cornerstone of our foreign policy and plans for the future.

In other words, the future doesn't automatically BELONG to the biggest military bully on the block. Exactly as our President pointed out.

There are various cliches that refute his stupidity like "Peace through superior firepower", ad nauseum. History is written by the victors and it's safe to assume the victors have more armies and weapons.

Even Sarah Palin knows that to keep out the foreign invaders that one needs an Army.

All you Obama voters, such as Hugo's Ghost, Copyleft, and others, we are now seeing another Jimmy Carter presidency. As they say, "those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it, and lo and behold if we're not repeating it already."

Why couldn't have we elected Sarah Palin for president. She has more backbone,(I had to keep it family friendly here.) than B. Hussein Obama.

Or at least dont sit in front of Fox News angry all day watching Hannity cry about how he isnt getting enough books sold. Man republicans are angry people when they lose hair over 1 line the democratically elected president says in Russia

"What kind of future are Russia and America going to have together? What world order will replace the Cold War?"

What 'world order' is Obama talking about? Why isn't Obama asking questions like 'how is America going to get back to the rule of law, which is the constitution?' What world order is he referring to? Can someone find the words 'world order' in the constitution? Im being completely serious here? Boortz maybe you could talk about what 'world order' means today. Why doesn't he use the words 'sovereign nation?'

Also the cold war has ALREADY been replaced, look at how China and India continue to move ahead...only a neo-con would show evidence that he/she is stuck in the Cold War mentality.