Here's an article I found from a professional journal.
http://www.stsci.edu/stsci/meetings/lisa3/beckmanj.html

The Greenies out there have a keen understanding of the sun's effects on our climate. In the 70's they warned of an ice age. In 2000 they warned of global warming. Now, they have this new, catchy term we are all adopting called climate change. If there is too much rain, too little rain, its too hot or too cold, they can now blame climate change on man. It's the exact reason that the terminology has been changing. In a few more years they will say that their efforts to limit large vehicles or some other poop has reduced the temperature. If we get too cold, they will find some other gas to blame it on. Meanwhile, China and India will become industrial giants filling the air with smog that is outside of our control. The don't want to focus on the most likely cause of climate change, hydrogen gas.

Neal, I'm afraid you're misinterpreting that graph. Please understand that it shows the tail-end of the graph below it, the long-term sunspot cycle. It's been shown that climate change is not directly connected to that cycle, but that changes in solar activity which can affect the cycle that can affect Earth's temperature.

What is the over-under on how long it will take CopyLeft to tell us we are all just ignorant goons for not understanding that the science is "settled", how long before Ivan explains that there is a major conspiracy or T-Shirt Doctor to explain that it is all a plot by the military-bankers-corporations-government?

The increased solar activity of the late 20th century was predicted. There were concerns over satelites, communications, and the power grid, in the US Military in the late '80s.

I figured out the global warming/climate change fraud early, I noticed two of the first global warming alarmists in the early 80's had written a paper I'd read about 10 years earlier on an impending ice age.

That made sense, if you look at a timeline of the ice ages, we're about due, but they were saying it was because of our industrial emissions blocking the sun to a tipping point. I was doubtful, because I knew the KGB seeded western 'environmental' groups with with millions to try to reduce our growth and industrial output. Brilliant subversion technique, btw, the groups cost little to start, nothing to maintain, because they feed off donations from western dupes and fellow travelers. They use those funds to attack, stall, and make prohibitavely expensive any industrial development, and they've been very effective, though they most often damage the environment worse than they help.

When these same two 'scientists' wrote a paper in the early 80's claiming our industrial and consumer emissions were now causing the opposite climatic effects, I knew theirs was a 'solution' in search of a problem. Lots of very respectable people who should know better fell for it.

People are starting to catch on, though the 'environmentalists' have smoothly shifted from global warming to "climate change," a self fulfilling prophecy.

Neal, last year you were telling us the earth was warming because of solar flares. And your proof was that readings on Mars showed warming there. Now we've been cooling for the last eight years. Which is it?

I dont see the link................and I need to send this to the moonbats that dont look at this site.

seems to be missing

Neil, where is the link? I was wanting to submit it to Fark to watch the zelots defend the farce that is AGW, but the link isn't there!

Neal, should there be a link for a story here?