advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand

Nobody's listening.

FUTURE TAX BREAKS FOR GM

By
Neal Boortz
@ June 1, 2009 8:47 AM
Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBacks (0)

Are we encouraging companies to turn to the government? GM is going to save more than $12 billion in tax breaks .... If it ever becomes a viable company again. But these new tax rules don't apply to companies that don't turn to the government for help but are taken over by other private companies. Chrysler, for example, could lose the value of its tax write-offs if it merges with Fiat.

The AP explains:

U.S. taxpayers are about to become majority shareholders in GM, acquiring more than 70 percent of the company in exchange for billions of dollars in aid. Under ordinary circumstances, an ownership change like that would trigger a big tax hit for a money-losing corporation like GM, severely limiting its ability to use current losses to lower future tax bills.

But these are far from ordinary times. The Treasury Department has, in effect, suspended long-standing tax rules for companies that receive bailout money, providing benefits not available to firms that don't receive government help. New Treasury rules could provide GM billions in tax breaks once it becomes profitable and starts paying taxes again, which could be years away.

The value of those savings, however, would be dramatically reduced if GM is taken over by another company. Decades ago, Congress severely restricted the ability of money-losing companies to cash in on the tax breaks if they are taken over by other companies.

The goal was to discourage corporate takeovers for the principle purpose of avoiding taxes, Willens said.

The government, however, doesn't want to penalize firms for taking part in the taxpayer-financed bailout, so the Treasury Department has issued several notices in recent months creating exceptions for firms that receive bailout money. Under the new rules, corporations can keep their tax breaks if the government becomes a majority owner.

OK ... let's put this in language that even the purposely dumbed-down government educated myrmidons in this country can understand. If you are running a substantial private business and if you decide that it is your responsibility to weather this economic storm and keep your business viable without using taxpayer's money and submitting to more authoritarian government control, you will then have to pay your taxes just like everyone else. Wait ... NOT like everyone else. That would be because if you decide that you can't make it on your own, and government intervention with taxpayer's money would be helpful, you will be rewarded with corporate tax breaks. Got it on your own, no help. Play footsie with government control, financial benefits await. Not the way to run a free enterprise economy.



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: FUTURE TAX BREAKS FOR GM.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/32567

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • How's Ford doing?
    Ford seems to be coming out of the darkness on this, why couldn't GM do the same? Because GM was foolish enough to believe an Administration that specialize in Crisis. Like Rahm said "Don't let a good crisis go to waste". All they saw in the GM debacle was a way to pay back the unions for getting them elected. What they have succeeded in doing is destroying a company that used to be the gold standard on measuring how well the markets doing. They may also see a way to satiate China for buying our bonds by letting the Chinese sell cars using GM as a front. Transparency at it's finest America....
  • I'm gonna be a 'shareholder'?
    "U.S. taxpayers are about to become majority shareholders in GM"

    Really? Will we get dividends from the new Government Motors?
  • Smooth Op
    I am aware of the thought process of Copyleft and the likes.

    I never said a majority, and unfortunately a plurality is all that is needed with this process. However, the majority of Americans did vote for a President that is not interested in a truly free America(myself included). McCain is just Obama light (no racial pun intended). McCain could have just as easily run on a D ticket.

    I am “hopeful” that there will not be a second term for our current President, but the damage has been done, and the other side(which is really just a watered down version) is not much better.
  • @Andre
    Correction, when scum like Copyleft and his ilk say "we" they mean Marxist/Socialists.

    These douchebags consistently point out (see below) how much they despise free-market economics. Go ahead, ask Copy for yourself and you'll get the appropriate response.

    And BTW, they only won with a 9 million vote plurality. Hardly a majority and judging from the polls, looking more like a one and done presidency.
  • Rullivan/Copy
    When copyleft says "we" he is referring to the voters of America. They voted for this administration, won, and are now getting what they voted for.
    This policy is consistent with liberal thought and should not be a surprise to anyone. I do not agree with any of it, but it is to be expected.
  • who do you think you speak for
    "we neither have, need, or WANT a free enterprise economy," --just who is this "we" that you feel you speak on behalf of? Wow, you're an incredibly arrogan moron... and I must say I was surprised I didn't see one of those oh so cute "snickers" at the end of the post.
  • Future Tax Breaks for GM
    "U.S. taxpayers are about to become majority shareholders in GM,..." The AP has this completely wrong. If you listen to Obama, this is a Federal resource. The U.S. taxpayers own nothing.
  • You Missed the Point, Neal
    You're right, it is precisely not the way to run a FREE enterprise economy. Since when did czars need to be appointed to tell us how to do it?
  • Corporate Welfare
    Anyone who has ever used the term "corporate welfare" can now see it in full bloom. GM and Chrslyer will never, ever be allowed by the statists to repay their debts to the government! Congress will want to keep GM government owned so they can dictate the terms of the union contracts. While they're at it they will amend the laws of physics so they can build cars with "zero carbon footprint." GM will never turn a real profit again; the government will keep pumping taxpayer dollars down that rathole to keep the operation afloat. This will keep the unions fed, fat and happy. And, of course, the actual taxpayers will be footing the bill.

    Would that the ownership of the company were going to people who actually pay taxes, instead of the government. You'd get a stock certificate in the envelope with your tax refund. The number of shares would be figured according to the net amount of tax you actually paid. Then the company would belong to the producers in this country, and would be able to try to operate in a rational real-world manner instead of the government-is-all fantasy land that BO and the libs think they can legislate into existence.
  • Not the way to run a free enterprise economy.
    True... and since we neither have, need, or WANT a "free enterprise economy," this seems like a good policy.

    A completely unregulated market, after all, would be a national nightmare. Only insane wingnuts and Randroids want that.
  • Tax Breaks for Gov't Subsidized Cos.
    This needs to be challenged in court. This looting of our future must cease.

    The ripple-effect from GM/Chrysler will deepen the recession as dealerships & small vendors to both companies and their dealers fold. This makes any investment risky and any property owned by citizens vulnerable because of the way the Administration is seizing companies.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement