advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand

Nobody's listening.

DEMOCRATS JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH GOVERNMENT

By
Neal Boortz
@ June 12, 2009 8:05 AM
Permalink | Comments (31) | TrackBacks (0)

Yesterday I spelled out for you the "suggestions" and "guidelines" the Obama administration has for executive pay.  These guidelines are meant for executives at any publically traded company.  Are you letting that sink in, folks?  We are talking about the government setting guidelines for how CEOs at private companies will be paid, whether or not they have received bailout funds, TARP funds, fun funds or whatever.   A top counselor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says, "We believe that compensation practices must be better aligned with long-term value and prudent risk management at all firms, and not just for the financial services industry."  That's what the tax cheat's counselor believes.  I believe the government has no business whatsoever getting involved in how private companies compensate their employees.  The role of the government is to provide a forum where employment and pay contracts can be adjudicated and enforced ... nothing more.

 

As for companies that have received bailout money, the government's new "master of pay" will be setting the actual specific compensation levels.  You don't have to be government educated to realize that this is going to mean that the brightest and most capable talent out there.  What capable executive wants to work for a private-sector company where government hacks with not one-tenth of his ability will be setting his salary? 

 

Some Democrats are upset.  Any rational person would be upset over the fact that the government will be meddling in the compensation levels of private businesses.  But this is not what they are upset about.  They are upset because they feel that the Obama administration's efforts to reform private sector executive pay haven't gone far enough. 

One of those Democrats would be Rep. Brad Sherman of California.  He says that the government's plans to have shareholder's vote on compensation packages should be made binding on board of directors.  In other words, Brad Sherman should write the incorporation by-laws for America's businesses. 

 

Of course, slobbering Barney Frank is another Democrat who believes that the administration hasn't gone far enough.  He says, "I do differ with the administration in that hope springs eternal and their position seems to be that if we strengthen the compensation committees we will do better ... I believe the structure of compensation has been flawed."  In other words, the government can do it better. 

 

Speaking of slobbering Barney ......



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: DEMOCRATS JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH GOVERNMENT.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/33724

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Forced service
    Government has a simple way to compete with the private sector while granting less compensation... they will draft CEOs into service against their will.
  • pay
    Here in Tn our governor (demo) is upset that he must try to bribe GM to keep the Spring Hill Plant. This stte just does not have n extra $200 million right now!! I guess the jobs will go to Michigan.
  • incompetence everywhere
    governement can't manage there way out of a paper bag much less run a fortune 500 company. please
  • Democrats just can't get enough government
    It's simple really. If Kandi Krakhed or Billy Burgerslinger can't make big money, then no body can. This is Amerika and ever body gon.na be equal
  • Sharing the wealth
    It's simple really. If Kandi Krakhed or Billy Burgerslinger can't make big money, then no one is allowed to. This is Amerika and all people gonna be equal.
  • Dare someone suggest legislation that sets compensation for government employees by popular vote?

    I don't care how much the CEO of Home Depot gets paid, that is a decision for the board of directors of Home Depot.

    If you hold stock in a company and you don't like the companies policies or executive bonus structure, voice it at the shareholder meeting, sell your stock, or shut up.
  • Because Alan...
    Explain to me we this gentleman is worth $245m?

    the Board said he was worht it....remember it is run by a board and teh board said so....

    jhc, it is thier right to pay them what they want....if they lose money so be it...just don't make us fricken pay for it........and if you invest in that company......pull your money out...no one has a gun to your head making you....at least Obambi hasn't done that yet....!!!
  • Easy way around the pay scales
    The upper echelon of the corporation will be "contracted" instead of being hired as an employee.

    Shame we cant pay scale cap Hollywood actors. /s/
  • Another paved road...
    for corruption and payoffs. Companies that out enough in the offering plate will be allowed to maintain their salary structure. Those that don't will lose talent, leading to more failed businesses and higher job loss. Way to go Obama!
  • Pay limits
    This sums it all up. I doubt our elite government officials will even consider it. After all, they know better than all of us!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ2GXmN2Aa4
  • Home Depot
    If the stockholders and board did not think he was worth it, he wouldn't have gotten it. If they now believe they were wrong, too bad so sad, but it's the stockholders that suffer. That's why it's called "investing" which has an inherent amount of risk and gambling. That same risk and gambling made them big bucks in the decades prior to this recent loss. Why should the American taxpayers foot the bill to watch over these people just to protect risk takers (investors) from other risk takers (CEO's).
  • what don't you get?
    There you go again Boortz with your "brightest and most capable" lie. Has it ever occurred to you that maybe if an executive drives a company into such dire straits that they would NEED to go begging for a bailout, that maybe that executive is NOT "the best and most capable"? That MAYBE that executive should really be the one cooking the fries instead of getting a golden parachute?

    There is this eternal dream to make welfare recipients grovel and suffer for being on the government dole. Well how about the same be imposed on the companies that are getting CORPORATE WELFARE? Why do THEY get a free pass from the government misery machine?

    By the way, who sold us down this idea of handing out CORPORATE WELFARE in the first place? Come on Boortz, you know who it is... it's BUSH! GEORGE W. BUSH and HIS Treasury Secretary. You know his name, don't you? It's HENRY PAULSON!

    If you don't want Democrats to go government-crazy then you and your myrmidons need to put down the Frank Luntz talking points and tell your Republican friends to stop giving the Democrats the opportunity to do just that!
  • randy
    you are now going to have to be "colonized" hi pressure at that. keep a eye out for barnyard frankfooter
  • osamabamas mullah.....................
    progressive my ass!!!

    osamabama does want to ruin the U.S. 'cuz his mullah says so.

    we could defeat an armed force coming onto our shores. the armed forces of the united states would not be needed, hunters, sportsmen and our gun totin' bible carring "RED NECKS could handle the job. we could weather a nuke, bio, chem attack but at a very high price. we can not survive an attack from within. our own gubmint seems to be the enemy.

    others have said this as I have "We are DOOMED" unless we retake control! we can't trust politicians! 'specially the scum suckers that are in now. they put us here. I would rather trust a drunk monkey with a hand grenade in a small space than any of our "finest" politicians.

    DRIP don't return incumbent politicians
  • Lets' not sugarcoat it, Fauxbama is a STATIST
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/statism


    The practice or doctrine of giving a centralized government control over economic planning and policy.

    That is the best description for what the Demoncraps are attempting to bring about.

    Why can't leftist accept this simple truth?
  • what max wage?
    Its obvious some people didn't read the article .. just popped off based solely on neal's thoughts ...

    "Still, Frank made it clear he did not wish to impose pay caps.

    "We are not talking here about the amount. We are talking here about the structure of compensation," he said. "And I believe the structure of compensation has been flawed.""

    Take Home Depot for example: "According to the report, Home Depot (Research)'s board has awarded him $245 million in his five years at the helm. Yet during that time, the company's stock has slid 12 percent while shares of its archrival, Lowe's (Research), have climbed 173 percent."
    Explain to me we this gentleman is worth $245m?
  • Obama is a Progressive
    It seems to me that the president is more a 'progressive' than anything else. I agree with Neal that he doesn't intend to do harm to America like some say. He wants to 'remake' America like his predecessors, Wilson, Roosevelt, Sinclair, Dewey, et all. To defeat this movement, we need to correctly define it.
    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Thought/fp12.cfm
  • Government involved for years in pay rates
    Reminder: The US government has been involved for years in setting pay rates for private companies: it is called the Minimum Wage. It is set to go up July 24 for the 3rd consecutive year.

    Of course, this is not to say that it is right.
  • Returning the favor
    If Congress feels they should be setting compensation in the private sector based on theirs whims, er, long term performance, then how about trying an experiment. Maybe the top private companies in the various industries should be able to set guidelines for Congressional pay, and especially retirement packages. Sure, there may e some Constitutional issues, but that hasn't really seemed to be a concern lately.

    It would be fun to see what happens.
  • Government pay scales
    I've been saying for years that if they can set a minimum wage they can set a maximum wage, and any wage period. They can declare a single wage for everyone if they so desire. Once SCOTUS has said that federal legilation setting private wage levels of any kind is constitutional there is really no limiting it. The interstate commerce act has been stretched to where they can say you can't grow a single marijuana plant in your back yard because it could affect interstate commerce...that's really where the justification for marijuana laws come from...so what makes you think that minimum wage laws can't be expanded to wages period?
  • Government pay scales
    I've been saying for years that if they can set a minimum wage they can set a maximum wage, and any wage period. They can declare a single wage for everyone if they so desire. Once SCOTUS has said that federal legilation setting private wage levels of any kind is constitutional there is really no limiting it. The interstate commerce act has been stretched to where they can say you can't grow a single marijuana plant in your back yard because it could affect interstate commerce...that's really where the justification for marijuana laws come from...so what makes you think that minimum wage laws can't be expanded to wages period?
  • The best argument against big government
    can be found in the United Kingdom Independence Party. They are the big winners in the European Union UK elections coming in second after the Conservatives and beating the Labor Party(the party of the government in power). This party is libertarian in principle and it proves that parties in favor of liberty and responsibility as well patritism can win. Libertarians and conservatives here in the U.S. could learn a lot from them.
  • Can't Get Enough Government
    So is Mr. Geithner going to set giudeline for how much the Federal Government is compensated?
  • Govt Squeeze Play
    Now the govt has a minimum wage and a
    maximum wage. Next step, reel them in
    and reduce the margin size until we are
    nothing more than an agrarian society.
    Everybody plants the wheat, rice, etc.,
    and at the end of the day you get your
    bowl of mush... "Please sir, may I
    have more."

    Pardon me while I go out to play in
    traffic. It's just not worth living
    any more.
  • Compensation for members of the senate & congress
    Compensation should be reduced to minimum hourly amount, benefits no more than what someone being paid low salary would receive. These clowns are totally clueless on how to run a country without running it in the ground, like they are doing this great country
  • Whew...
    We are in for a very bumpy ride. This will not end well.
  • Compensation for Exec's?
    If we're only talking about companies that are publicly traded, you are bound by SEC rules. And the current admin will leverage their control over the SEC to set these type compensation restrictions.

    This is horrible. What happens when publicly traded companies start buying back their stock (slowly to prevent a spike) and then remove themselves from the market so they aren't bound by those rules.

    This could have a huge effect on our ability to invest in these businesses. Then, all we'll have to invest in are T Bills and bank CD's.

    Long time away but this is not right.
  • Government lackies
    And this friends...is why you will have some government appointed bum, with no private sector experience, running fortune 500 companies. It is nationalization by default. How many of you will keep your retirement/stock in such companies? Who is going to want to invest and/or purchase goods/ services from such companies?
  • Big Government
    I never thought I'd type what I'm about to, but: Considering the current state of things.....I wish Hillary had won.

    Now if you'll excuse me I need to take about a 3-hour 'Karen Silkwood' shower.
  • Other sectors also need "reformed"
    The Obama Administration and Congress should be sure to regulate high-level pay in other sectors of the economy also.
    I suggest that current and former Congresspersons and Senators should have their speaking engagement fees limited to what is "fair" and that any payment for writing books be limited by how many books are actually sold, with no large "advance" paid just for name recognition. I'm sure that PBO will jump right on that last one, after he quietly banked $5million in advance money for a "book" he will "write" (wink-wink) after he leaves office.
    Fair is fair, won't the Democrats agree??
  • DEMOCRATS JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH GOVERNMENT
    i just can't believe you wrote DEMOCRATS JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH GOVERNMENT heading for that article. oh, i get it, you wrote that so people would read it.
    i would have the heading POLITICIANS JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH GOVERNMENT.
    but you don't want to do that. that would make the republicans angry. and you don't want the ditto-heads angry at you. that would cost you untold of drop offs on your Twitter page.
    LINO
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement