advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand

Nobody's listening.

OBAMA'S JUSTICE ... WHAT'S IN STORE

By
Neal Boortz
@ May 11, 2009 8:39 AM Permalink | Comments (17) | TrackBacks (0)

Most of us are operating under this belief that the purpose of our appeals courts, including the Supreme Court, is to consider questions of interpretation of our laws in the light of prior court rulings and our Constitution. Yeah .. that might be what most of us think, but it is most certainly NOT what President Obama is thinking.

Sometime soon .. possibly this week .. Obama will let us know his choice to replace Justice Souter. I'm not looking for him to appoint anything resembling a strict Constitutionalist. Instead, he will appoint someone who treats the Court as merely a second legislative branch of government.

To understand just what kind of a Supreme Court Obama wants, just read this column from the Weekend editi8on of The Wall Street Journal. Back in 2001 a Chicago radio station interviewed the future president. The subject somehow turned to the Supreme Court. Obama told the listeners that he was disappointed that the Supreme Court has done little more than just defending peoples "formal rights." Obama wished that the Court had spent some more time addressing "more basic issues of political and economic justice." Uh oh. There's that "justice" word again. To me "justice" is when someone gets what they deserve. To the left "justice" is when someone gets what they want. And just what economic justice issue did Obama want the Supreme Court to spend more time addressing? Well .. how about "redistribution of wealth?" That's right! Back in 2001 Obama was telling how he wanted the Supreme Court to be a player in efforts to take money from those who earned it to hand to those who did not. There's Obama's Supreme Court ... taking wealth from those who earned it and giving it to those who want it.

There's still more change you can believe in.

Isn't this so much fun?

Categories:

Tags:

Main Index | Archives | RSS feed

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: OBAMA'S JUSTICE ... WHAT'S IN STORE.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/30473

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!

Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Obama Man
    If you haven’t seen this, you should:



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhhkF3dqXR0
    By BD Malone @ 05/11/09 03:41:27 PMreport abuse
  • at the same time Liberal Hater....
    I guess it is worth a try to get a copy of Ron Paul's book to Neal. That way we can at least say we tried.
    By Red Leader @ 05/11/09 02:05:40 PMreport abuse
  • t-shirt doctor...
    You have a point and sadly you are correct. Maybe Boortz truly does not care about this country the way he says he does. He has indeed said on his show that he would lie on the show, and yes he is an entertainer. I guess we really can't rely on him to help restore the republic as he seems to truly be naieve on foreign policy, and seems to out right reject logic sometimes on the midle east problems. It is beyond me how he can complain about the cash hemoraging in D.C but want continued military presence and adventurism in countries that have nothing to do with American security.Everytime he talks about the mid-east problems its like he doesn't realize that if middle easterners were doing the same things to America that America is involved in over there and has been for years, Americans would be provoked to do something about it.Its easy to forget I guess because Boortz seems passionate about what he's saying and makes sense on other topics to forget that he is just an entertainer that will say what needs to be said to keep the checks coming in. Even more so for the Jerry Springer of talk radio.... Hannity.
    By Red Leader @ 05/11/09 02:04:23 PMreport abuse
  • Joyce & Red Leader
    Since it's obvious we are shaping up to be the champions of Ron Paul's cause, I say send Neal the book!!! He needs to wake up and realize that Ron Paul voted in favor of the War in Afghanistan and stop with his false claims of him not being in favor of defending this country. I mean, think about how we would be today if he had been elected. Would we be arguing over these stimulus bills? Would we be worried about taking away our gun rights? Would we be worried about ANY of our rights being taken away? Would we still be enslaved to The Federal Reserve System? I think not. People like The Fantastic Four (copyleft, hugo, gavin, and stan) wouldn't have a leg to stand on in the argument. Ron Paul is the future!!
    By LiberalHater @ 05/11/09 01:25:00 PMreport abuse
  • Easy question bajaretired
    Easy question-
    Just like all the other liberals in DC, thay want to redistribute taxpayer money, not their own.
    By fritz @ 05/11/09 12:51:43 PMreport abuse
  • @Ayuda...you are right
    The sad part is the attitude of most Republicans is only helping drive up the number of their drones.

    Even in posts on this site, the discussion around defending our borders quickly turns to an assault on our language and culture. As I am sure you know, there are so many legal Hispanics who love and appreciate the founding principles of this country but feel less than welcome in the Republican party.
    By LandMind @ 05/11/09 12:09:29 PMreport abuse
  • neal won't do it
    if he'd went libertarian on his show he wouldn't make as much money, because all the republicans listeners would fade away.

    he's an entertainer, he's said it himself, and entertainers go where the moneys at
    By tshirt-doctor.com @ 05/11/09 11:33:09 AMreport abuse
  • redistribution
    If PrezBO is into redistribution of wealth, why is it that he has millions and he has family living in poverty? Just a thought.
    By bajaretired @ 05/11/09 11:16:18 AMreport abuse
  • har ya go
    The Neal Boortz Show
    1601 W. Peachtree Street
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309
    By Joyce M/Blythe @ 05/11/09 11:04:33 AMreport abuse
  • Joyce...
    A very good idea Joyce!! Is there an address on this website where we could send Boortz the book? Maybe the person who checks over these posts could give us advice on how to get it to him?
    By Red Leader @ 05/11/09 10:46:15 AMreport abuse
  • Red
    Maybe we should send Neal the book! I do have RP's book on my list. Have several videos on my blog and LH sent me another link that I posted. So doing what I can to spread the word.
    By Joyce M/Blythe @ 05/11/09 10:25:27 AMreport abuse
  • Joyce...
    Nicely done Joyce! I don't agree with Paul on everything, but I truly believe that most of his ideas can't be defeated, and he or someone like him is what this country needs. ( Former New Mexico gov. Gary Johnson is another great Jeffersonian conservative.) A return to true Jeffersonian/Washington conservatism. Obama can easily be defeated if the GOP gets behind Paul's ideas and champions the constitution. You should check out Paul's book "the revolution:a manifesto" he also has one coming out about defeating the Fed. I wish Neal would talk about and promote the book and the idea of ending the Fed.
    By Red Leader @ 05/11/09 09:58:55 AMreport abuse
  • hey red leader...
    i really enjoy your posts but the word "neo-con" is really wearing itself thin in your posts. every post contains the word to some degree. we get it, you don't like the direction of the republican party, and you favor a more strict interpretation of the constitution. i'm with you on both accounts, but i know i can skip your posts now because they all say the same thing. no offense, just constructive criticism from a like minded individual.
    By DumpyThe Red @ 05/11/09 09:35:46 AMreport abuse
  • Justice as defined by community organizers
    Folks, as a hispanic male, I have been approached by organizations looking to eradicate racism by creating an unstopable army of community organizers.

    After attending an initial 2 hr workshop to see if you're interested, I saw what's comming to my country, which I defended while serving in the NAVY, and it's not pretty. Everything and I mean everything according to them has a racist component. From garbage collection, to advertising, to finance, and health care, the policy makers are white and therefore it's policies are not JUST. The word, "socio-economic justice" or "social justice" is engraved in your brain to make you beleive that America is racist and must be brought to their knees to correct that injustice.

    An army of liberal drones is about ready to be unleashed on our American way of life and we are asleep at the wheel. Unfortunately, our president is about ready to make it happen. Remember, he's the greatest community organizer in the world. God help America.
    By AYUDA @ 05/11/09 09:21:15 AMreport abuse
  • Red
    Spent a lot of time Saturday watching youtube on Paul. Smart Cookie for sure!
    By Joyce M/Blythe @ 05/11/09 09:10:09 AMreport abuse
  • appoint strict constitutionalist....
    Neal why would you now make a big deal about wanting to appoint a strict constitutionist to the supreme court when you had the chance to vote for a strict constitutionist in the presidential election(Ron Paul) and refused to do so? and based on the fact that he is a strict constitutionist conservative on foreign policy rather than the non-workable leftist neo-con mysticism you prescribe to when dealing with foreign policy? Why the inconsistencies?
    By Red Leader @ 05/11/09 09:00:42 AMreport abuse
  • Oath
    "I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."

    Do they not even pay attention to the oath they take? "equal right to the poor and the rich" "impartially discharge"

    Or are those just words, kinda like the oath Obama took?
    By Joyce M/Blythe @ 05/11/09 08:59:13 AMreport abuse
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement