advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand

Nobody's listening.

THE TARGET -- EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

By
Neal Boortz
@ April 3, 2009 9:02 AM
Permalink | Comments (33) | TrackBacks (0)

Well ... That is about what we expected from the G20 summit. World leaders pledged over a trillion dollars to poor countries. More seizure and redistribution of wealth. Other countries didn't bite at Obama's grand plan to stimulate the global economy by spending more money. Angela and Nicolas got somewhat of a compromise on their global financial regulators. The communiqué established the creation of a supervisory body to "flag" problems in the global financial system. Supervisory today .. regulatory tomorrow?

For all you wealth-envy types, you will be happy to know that the honchos managed to "bridge the gap" in terms of how far governments should go to regulate the market and curb what the political class deems to be "excesses." Obama says that world leaders have agreed on principles that would bring accountability and transparency to executive compensation at corporations. Note, please, that this communiqué wasn't limited to corporations receiving taxpayer bailout money. We are talking about Corporations ---Period. Obama says that company shareholders should be able to vote on executive compensation, implementing some sort of "shame function" into the establishment of corporate salaries.

"Shame." That is the word that our president would like to associate with evil CEOs and executive. If you receive compensation that is not in keeping with some politically set global standard, then you should be feeling shame.

Please tell me you don't actually think that this effort to control executive compensation is going to end with companies that receive bailout funds. Democrats - and some Republicans - know that wealth envy and hatred is at a historical high right now. They've been working for decades to bring us to this point - and now it's time to exploit. If these politicians can excuse limits on compensation based on the fact that the involved companies are receiving bailout funds, why not extend those controls to all companies with government contracts? How easy would it be to make the argument that any defense contractor should not be allowed to "unfairly" enrich top executives "at the expense of our men and women serving their country overseas." Once we have established the government contractor controls, we can extend the controls to any companies who supply goods or services to these contractors.

Smack down the executives with their high salaries and become a hero to the jealous class. There are far more people envious of highly compensated executives than there are people making a million a year. Count the votes and you'll see where this is going. The result will be executive and financial talent fleeing this country to work where the compensation matches the contribution.



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: THE TARGET -- EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/26623

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Belinda Skelton, Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Vote on Compensation
    When do we get to vote on the compensation for these incompetents in Washington? What would most of the Senate do if we capped their annual income, from all sources, at $500K? Can we vote on the pay for dumb bureaucrats? Please, let us vote on the pay for the people who will be running Obamacare. Then we might just see some service.
  • Executive Compensation
    Judging from Obama's egotistical personality, I would say that Obama has a problem with anyone in the United States being paid more money than he is. His demeanor is such that I can just hear him thinking "I am the President of the United States and therefore I should be paid more than anyone else who resides in the country."
  • Basic capitalism
    Where is John Galt when you need him?
  • AGain, it's not the need that's the issue, Sam
    That's a false choice, Samuel. What you are missing is that most of us do not agree that the government should be bailing out private companies at all. I don't care how much any private enterprise "needs" it, the government should NOT be giving it any taxpayer money. And just because our goverment wrongly interjected itself into private business in the first place doesn't mean I will agree it should continue to do so to the point of setting wages for workers. It's ALL bad.
  • Copyleft - concede please
    "public oversight" is just a euphemism for government control and management right down to some government flunky setting your pay. Now, if you think that doesn't harm or punish private enterprise, if you don't see that fundamentally altering our way of life, if you don't see how far down a very slippery slope this will lead, if you don't see how that opens the door to whatever imposition the next political hack will justify by invoking the "common good" (even if it one that you then might not agree with), then you must be wearing blinders the size of houses. Either that, or you are unhappy with your own position in life and choose to blame someone else rather than take responsibility for your own life and your own problems. Sorry if that might offend you, but as someone who worked his ass off to succeed and finally reached a "comfortable" level after 40 years of hard work (and not a few periods of unpleasant jobs and little money), I'm not very sympathetic to people who think they've been "cheated" out of their "rightful" rewards. And that's what you sound like to me.
  • Competition Drives Innovation
    In most all aspects of life competition drives innovation. One is only as good as his competition. When I was in high school I competed year after year with one other guy for the highest grades. If he made a 90 I only needed a 91 to be the best. At that point I no longer needed to try. Had a new student been introduced who made a 95 I would have to work harder to be the best. The same goes for sports. I always enjoyed competing against people who were far better than me as it made me a much stronger athlete. Now that I'm working I apply the same principles. I went to one of the best colleges in the country and received a very respectable degree. I feel I have the potential to one day become wealthy or at least live fairly comfortably. If a salary cap is placed on my position, or any other position for that matter, what compels to continue to strive for greatness once I've reached the top. If I'm the best and brightest in my field and I make the same as someone who is half as talented I can exert half the effort and maintain my position. Why try anymore? Competition, and thus creativity and innovation cease to exist.
  • Treaty? Approval?
    Ok... stupid me. Did Obama just enter into an agreement with other nations here without getting the Senate to approve it? I'm thinking... isn't that a requirement in the Constitution?
  • First they came for the CEOs....and then they came for me
    I'm just waiting on how Copyleft considers the president of the United States demanding a CEO step down as somehow being equivalent to publishing financial fundamentals of a company.

    If the president can effectively fire one person, he can fire anyone. Do'nt believe men? Well then consider this. Did you get a tax deduction this year? Or did you get a "tax cut"? Barney Frank may consider that imputed income, and the equivalent of you receiving government, subject to its regulations!

    "The rights of all men are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened." - JFK
  • Base Economics
    Here is something I also posted on a TownHall.com article by Charles Krauthammer. It was in another article from some time ago, maybe, NRO, TH, etc. Probably one written by Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, or maybe even Krauthammer himself.

    Ivan and Boris were two Russian peasants. They were both dirt poor. There was only one difference Ivan had a goat from which he derived a small amount of milk to help feed himself and his family. One day Boris spied an old lamp as he walked down a dusty dirt road. He picked it up and rubbed some of the grime off of it to see if it might have some value. Smoke began coming out of the lamp, there was a flash and suddenly a genie appeared. The genie said I can grant you one wish. It can be anything you want. Boris thought for only a second and said “I want Ivan’s goat to die”.

    This is the sort of country we have become and I can assure you that such an attitude is not and never will be compatible or conducive to an advanced high tech economic system. This is an attitude compatible or conducive with penury, misery, malnutrition, and death.
  • Executive Compensation
    This liberal furor over executive compensation is so uninformed. Do not these people already get punished enough with the highest tax rates, plus phase out of itemized deductions and the loss of other credits, because government has decided they are not entitled enough?

    If these executives were not worth the money they would not have been hired. If they don't perform then they get fired. Does the government think that the big salaries drive up the cost of the products to the consumers? What about all the cost of government that is built into these same products? Guess whose costs is the higher.
  • communique
    I think everyone is missing the biggest part of it, though you got close. It creates the (international) Financial Stability Board (FSB), as a successor to the FSF... and among the vows: "to endorse and implement the FSF's tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms."

    Sounds like international regulation of wages and 'social responsibility' of ALL firms...
  • Government Pay
    Since I am a US Tax payer does that mean I am a shareholder for the US government? Can I then "Shame" some Senators pay?
  • Again...
    It's not that the salaries are too high or bonuses too much. No one would care if the exec's in question made good decisions, were profitable, and didn't need government funding.

    I don't particularly care for Hollywood's politics but they make a ton of cash and don't need government assistance.

    The folks that buy into the "wealth envy" argument that Neal keeps making can't seem to figure out the difference here.
  • Compensation
    I look foward to the look on faces of the enternaiment industry execs when they're told they can only earn 500k for their last hollywood blockbuster that takes in a record 750 mil over one weekend.....
  • Pay
    How about some accountability and oversight for Government Officials? In this crisis, shouldn't even the BigO forgo salary? After all, he has room, board, food and transportation (including entourage of 500) paid for already, shouldn't he be willing to give up his salary?
  • Stop the wealth envy
    Seems the way to stop this madness may be to bring up professional athlete saleries. The one profession someone with nothing more than a high school government education can obtain. Won't the poor masses scream bias and race if we move to attack those filthy rich, undeserving athletes?
  • To: Asphalt Ranger
    I'll concede your point, as soon as you can explain how making corporate operations transparent and subject to public oversight is "harming" them or "punishing" them.
  • Shareholders and executive compensation
    Last time I checked, corporations were required to make reports to the shareholders concerning costs and revenues (including compensation). I make my decisions for investment and other things(like charity) on just that information.

    If you're too lazy to get that info, then you deserve to get screwed by "the man"
  • Compensation
    Directive 10-628 will now take effect.
  • Execs and Copyleft
    It never fails to amaze me how blind some people are when they smugly take pleasure in seeing someone they dislike get harmed. What copyleft always seems to overlook in his zeal to punish the evil producers and earners is that the government is setting a chilling precedent allowing it to punish the disfavored. And the disfavored tomorrow might be copyleft and his ilk. Wake up, kiddy, you could be next!
  • I don't think so Neal
    Neal, I agree with all of this except one point: I really don't think we would see that many executives fleeing to other countries. Other countries would have to have alot more to offer. I think we would see a new wave of people looking for ways to "beat the man."
  • Executive Compensation
    I wonder if President Obama, and the others that want to limit compensation, will include speaking fees and book advances once he leaves office?
  • If There Is Hope...
    It lies with the proles...
  • Exec Pay
    I wonder if the den of thieves are willing to limit how much those liberal movie stars make. I doubt it.
  • When did it become the government's job to hold private companies accountable?
    "There's nothing more horrifying than the prospect of accountability and transparency in corporate operations, is there?"

    There is when its is the government maintaining that accountability! If you don't like a company, don't buy their products, don't buy their shares, and don't have anything to do with them. They will die if they really suck. And if they are folding, don't bail them out! Just let them die, and the share holders will seize their assets and reinvest in another more successful company. The people who worked there can compete to work at the new company, or move on to something else, based on their merits and interests.

    However, if they produce something that everyone wants, and people flock to them, then they should pay things appropriately. The company can hire more people, or just pay everyone more money. It is their free choice!

    If the government makes them report their balance sheets to the shareholders, then the shareholders can make suitable decisions. But don't let poll-driven politicians, pandering to their voters, decide what is right and wrong! That would be MOB RULE!
  • CEO Pay
    Now we will finally find out how much the chairman of the Acme Corporation makes and who is resposible for those shoddy products that keep injuring innocent coyotes! Thanks President Obama!
  • Let's experiment with Baseball salaries first
    Let's experiment with Baseball salaries first.

    This will demonstrate whether government lifers can do a better job of setting wage levels than the private sector. And if they screw it up, it will only affect baseball, not global productivity.

    Players who hit .351 will surely be ashamed if they are paid more than someone else hitting .225!
  • Huh?
    Obama said "company shareholders should be able to vote on executive compensation", so whats the matter with that? Of course most of the time the board members already own a majority of the stock.
  • And who is next...
    I am an accountant, when will our oh so smart leaders decide what the cap should be on how much my job is worth. Most people do not think how far something like this should could go. People should stop comparing their lives to others and just be happy with what they have. I'm not rich, have no desire to be. I don't compare my life to that of others. I live within my means and do not try to keep up with the Jones's. Make life so much simpler.
  • Shame for ALL CEO's?
    Or just the ones that didn't do a good job. So far, I haven't heard anyone say bad stuff about IBM's CEO earning 20 million a year. Why? Because he does a good job of making money and pleasing shareholders.

    What Obama is referring to are the CEO's/executives that made bad decisions needing a government bailout yet give/get outrageous bonuses that are NOT in line with the free market.

    Neal, you always talk about minimum wage law being detrimental to jobs. I agree. Pay what the free market can bare and accept and you have a good system. That works on the other end as well.

    Wealth envy? Nope. I just don't want the free market to collapse because the bad decision makers decide it's better to give each other bonuses at the expense of their own companies and jobs.
  • Our duly elected representatives ...
    know not, and know not that they know not, which is a very sad statement to make about the folks who voted these ++"s" into orifice.
  • Pay
    How about some accountability and oversight for entertainers and athletes salaries? Aren't they a little overinflated, too?
  • Gosh
    There's nothing more horrifying than the prospect of accountability and transparency in corporate operations, is there?

    "That would be Just Awful. We certainly can't have any of THAT, can we? Because... because... well, just BECAUSE, darn it all."

    Not much of an argument, Neal.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement