Neal Just say it is because he is black. Are you a coward to admit it. I would respect you more if you would admit to that rather than finding silly excuses.

Mike L.

What hair. Nealz as bald as I am.

I don't know Neal...a little wine, some dim light, some funny tea...NAAA

i keep repeating this to the ignoramouses on the left, but the tea parties are about a lot of issues that have escalated in the past 3 months with Barack Obama acting like a kid in a candy store when it comes to overspending on some useless government programs that never worked in the past. Here's a good article on what the tea parties are about:

http://www.examiner.com/x-6571-Atlanta-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m4d12-The-Tea-Parties--whats-in-the-name

Neal, your hair looks better in this pic than at the golf tourney the other day.

Spoken like a true guv,mnt teat sucking lib. One of the days you will grow up and realize that you should have been paying more attention instead of following the dumbmasses. Try to be a leader and not a follower.

Be very careful in telling people to "go annoy the government,annoy the liberals, annoy the msn.." because the new dept.of homeboys security will brand you a rightwing terrorist instagating hatespeach & terrorism. Since GITMO is being dismantled you will be interned there at the renamed AIR AMERICA RADIO BROADCASTERS RE-EDUCATON COMPOUND(also known as Camp Frankenstin after the hero of radio & politics,Al Franken)where you will be tor...I mean re-educated into a community organizer to fit back into the Obamanation social pecking order...enjoy your new carreer under our great leader's wisdom

Are you there?

Or was this just a drive by?

Oh, I get it, there's no defending your position...

You people do realize...that Clinton left a budget surplus..."

Hardly. Every year Clinton was in office, the federal debt increased[1]. While in government-ese, it may be deemed a surplus, in reality it is not.. What Clinton did, was borrow from one government account to another, one which wasn't "on the books" compared to one that was[2]. This shift was extrapolated out ten years, and THAT is what was called "Clinton's surplus." Like any statement from a politician, it was patently false.

[1] http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
[2] While the feds say we have $11 trillion in debt, you do realize we have over $50 trillion in "unfunded liabilities" including Social Security. While the feds may not call it debt, they still borrow from it.

Please get your facts straight:
The Reagan tax rates were flattend and reduced over the course of his presidency, resulting in increased revenues...spent very quickly by the Democrat controlled Congress. Reagan recognized that high marginal tax rates discourage effort, achievement and investment/savings. High tax rates make earners either earn less or find ways to hide their earnings (tax loopholes and tax evasion). A reduction in high marginal tax rates boosted long term growth, and reduced the need for tax shelters and other means of not paying taxes. The economic benefits Reagans tax reductions were summarized by President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers in a 1994 summary which pointed out that "It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was a strong impetus to economic growth." ...the same growth that Clinton took credit for. Comparing Bush and Reagans tax rates is another straw dog. Marginal tax rates were much higher in the early 1980s, and thus more likely to have had distortive economic effects than the more moderate rates of the 2001-2008. Adjusting the effect of Reagans tax cut for inflation and the subsequent 1982 tax increase, scaling back the 1981 tax cut, the net rate is larger when looked at from the perspective of a percentage or share of GDP...2.1% for Reagan, and 1.5% for Bush.

Clinton did not generate a surplus. This is a myth that even the Congressional Budget office disputes. Clinton was adept at manuevering facts and figures to an easily duped public. Clinton's national debt, made up of public debt and intergovernmental holdings, included things such as savings bonds and treasury bills (public debt: stuff purchased from the government) and intergovernmental holdings which is when the government borrows money from itself...mostly by robbing the social security "lockbox". What Clinton did was pay off much of the public debt by borrowing huge sums of intergovernmental holdings...again mostly Social Security. The situation was helped by the fact that Social Security Administration must, by law, use any surplus to purchase U.S. Government securities, which automatically a become intergovernmental holdings, adding to the impression of a surplus.

Those Orlando Chicks are hot!

And for you Ms Katherine it has nothing to do with the current admin. its about the tax code and wastefull spending by BOTH parties.

Now that's a FACT.

"You people do realize you're paying Bush's tax rates for 2008, right?"

Do you realize this isn't JUST about taxes? It's about SPENDING more than three generations can produce. It's about government interference in our every day lives. It's about losing our constitutional rights. It's about restoring the Constitution and letting those in Washington know WE'VE HAD ENOUGH of their big government BS.

Have ya noticed that the tea parties are non-partisan? It's not a bunch of Bushies getting together and protesting Obama. It's people from various backgrounds who are fed up with the creeping scope of the increasingly intrusive federal government -- regardless of who's running it.

Once again, a knee-jerk liberal who thinks that being a libertarian/conservative and a Bushie have to be synonymous. I can assure you that there are PLENTY of us who appreciated Bush's strength against Islamofascists but despised his spineless defense of our nation against big government and socialism.

You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

That girl on the right is butter. Everything butter face.

"It's not your fault. Don't feel bad, Neal-your little fairtax doesn't have a bunch of think tanks and lobbyists behind it like these teabagging parties do. You didn't really think this was a grassroots movement, did you?"
By Hugo's ghost

And???? Is there a point there or do you just really enjoy being a PITA? Careful or we'll be calling you Copy Jr.

May be hot! Needs a paper bag over her face.

The brunette is HOT!! Just kidding.... stick to being a man Neal.

Boy, that one on the right is definitely a "double-bagger"!

I'll be attending our local TEA(Taxed Enough Already) Party tonight. Let's hope we have a big turn-out at everyone of them. Wherever you are, turn out and let your voice be heard!