http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/08/what-is-left-on-cutting-room-floor.html

Here is a link on Ahmadinejad. In this discussion, he speaks mostly about democracy for Palesinians, rather than specifically about a one-state solution. If this is propaganda, it is at leat better than the typical pro-Israel garbage. Whatever take a person has, you have to be stupid or completely dishonest to claim that the Palsetinians haven't been wronged for decades by the Israelis, or that the Israelis aren't the aggressors.

I'll dissect your bovine scatology point by point:

"Spooner is absolutely correct...
Iran is a 3rd world country with no military capability to reach the U.S. If a 3rd world country has the ability to bring America to its knees, then that is your obvious reality check that America needs to start taking care of itself. Iran is not a threat to mainland America.Period."

Uh,no. They just help fund, train, indoctrinate, and export Islamic terrorists just like the rest of the Islamo-fascist states across the Middle East.

"Israel is not America's responsibility to give welfare to."

What's wrong with supporting Israel? They're just about our only ally in the region, and we share intel, to boot.

"We need to start worrying about the American border and not Israel's."

Actually, 900 million American dollars of Obamessiah's stimulus bill is earmarked for the GAZA border, which means it will likely end up in Hamas coffers.

"America needs to stop funneling money it doesn't have into both Israel and the middle east shari'a law countries that probably pass it on to islamic radicals(Saudi Arabia)."

I'd rather it go to Israel than the Palestinians or the Wahabi bastards in Riyadh.

"Guys read the books by Chalmers Johnson and former Bin Laden intelligence agent Michael Scheuer."

Read this:

Former head of the bin Laden unit at the CIA and sharp critic of the Bush Administration, Michael Scheuer, writes in his 2002 book, Through Our Enemies Eyes, that Bin Laden “made a connection with Iraq’s intelligence service through its Khartoum station."
Link: http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2008/03/what_the_pentagon_report_misse.php

"The middle east is simply reacting to American colonialism mentailty. We see what the founding fathers' reaction to colonialism was. Why do we pretend it will be different for the middle east?"

Using your convoluted logic, we practiced "colonial mentality" when we fought back against the Nazis, Italian Fascists, and Japanese Imperialists. Newsflash sweetpea: To fight back against an enemy attacker you hit them where they live and breed. In the Middle East it's like this: PICK ONE.
I'm a former Soldier and Iraq War vet. Had it been up to me, I'd have destroyed 3/4ths of the Middle East on 12 September, 2001. That's how you fight a jihad.

"So what if Iran is testing weapons?"

Yeah, so what if a rogue, belligerant, terrorist state tries out some new (nuclear) weapons? Maybe we should ignore the gargoyles in North Korea, as well. You're a genius.

"Lets take a pro-America constitution first stance."

I'm all for it. As well as the protection of our national security.

"Get out of the middle east...we can't afford it!!!"

There's an entire region of the world chock full of Islamic zealots hellbent on a world Caliphate. We cannot afford to let them succeed.

I think anyone who underestimates the threat of the Iranians is in for a rude awakening. Idle banter and diplomacy will not work with this group - they think, Ahmadinejad in particular, that they have been tasked by Allah to bring about the 12th Imam, the Islamic messiah. They have stated they will vanquish the "Great" and "Little" Satans (The US and Israel respectively) and have urged Muslims to envision a world without the United States.

"But they are a third world country, how could they attack us?" They wouldn't have to directly...give their bomb to a terrorist organization and either launch it from a container ship right off our boarder or bring it across our northern or southern border. While it is easy to say that "that'll never happen!"...we didn't expect an event like 9/11 would happen either. I don't believe such an attack would focus on only one city either...these people don't want to frighten us, as I said, they wish to destroy us. It is fully possible they are planning a crippling attack on multiple targets simultaneously, although I fervently hope that is not the case. I would urge President Obama and his administration to not underestimate Ahmadinejad's eschatology - to do so could be a costly mistake with a price tag of countless lives.

Irony wrote: "we need to do various things to stop TEH TERRORISTAHS, and then turn around and call New York a bunch of sissies."

Actually, Irony, I wrote that y'all voted for Hillary Clinton. The rest is conjecture but I think you got it right for a change.

Todd, I appreciate the link. "The regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time" still doesn't sound like a one-state solution to me. If you have more info on that, I'd like to look at it. I've never heard that before reading your post.

Hey smooth based on your 'genocide' argument when do you expect the U.S to invade China and large parts of Africa? How much do you think that might cost the American tax payer, and where is that cash going to come from if America is RIGHT NOW 10 trillion in debt? Lets wake it up Smooth and try on some old school traditional conservatism for a change instead of this leftist big govt, police the planet, military welfare neo-conservatism that is helping to kill the American economy and aiding Al Queada with their recruitment numbers.

When did anyone in Iran threaten genocide against Israel? It hasn't happened. Israel has well-deserved enemies, but that's Israel's problem.

Your Nazi and Arab remarks are baseless, predictable and stupid.

What is the last nation that Iran has attacked? How many aggressive wars has Israel launched? That's what I mean by dovish.

Smooth, if you are an American, you need to get your priorities in order. Israel isn't your problem, and you are a fool to attack a fellow American for pointing out the obvious.

Are you by chance a member of the Nazi party? Or a member of CAIR (Council for American-Arab Relations)?

Because any nation (like Iran) that regularly threatens GENOCIDE towards another nation (like Israel) is not "dovish" by 21st century standards, period. Given that, I'd love to see what your definition of "dovish" is.

It's called greedy when corporate executives take private jets. What's it called when the president (our nation's executive branch, mind you) takes a private jet to sign bills in places other than his office?

I don't think you're understanding. Read up on WWI and see how colonialists invaded/intervened and drew lines in the middle east those people didn't want. What would Americans think if Iranians came and started redrawing the lines of America? They wouldn't have it. Again, nowhere in the constitution will you find "give taxpayer money to Israel" or "give tax payer money to middle eastern countries". Again look up Chalmers Johnson and his book 'Blowback'. The link you posted simply re-affirms that Israel is not America's responsibility...and again America has nukes and does not have the costitutional authority to tell any other country whether they can or can't have them. Sorry to break it to you.

p.s-Why doesn't America tell China and Pakistan to do away with their nukes?

25 years working for a bank and never got invited to a single "animal house" party. Guess John Kerry's right - been over a looooong time now

Todd, Lysander and Reality,

You need to refresh your memories.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/10/26/ahmadinejad/index.html

What a sorry lot the Unions have become. I wonder how many small business owners will be forced to close their doors because of this intimidation bill. I wonder how many people will think it is a good idea when they lose the job that the small business owner created for them. You think unemployment is high now, just wait till the unions are calling the shots.

Don't think it will happen, I wouldn't bet on it. Just remember elections have consequences!!!

Scott: Ahmadenijiad stated that Zionism should be wiped off the maps, not Israel--meaning that he is in favor of a one-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians share land and rights of citizenship. You might not hear that on the Neil Boortz show, but the information is out there.

Tony: Israel has been using the threat of nuclear weapons over the region for 40 years, so it's no wonder that Iran MAY want a weapon of its own, just to even things out a bit.

How is Israel of vital interest to the United States? I don't care if Israel loses a war, never receives another dime of taxpayer money, has to pay back "loans" from U.S. taxpayers out of Israeli coffers, or has her agents (AIPAC) within the U.S. held accountable for their actions. Why would an American citizen care if those things happen? Outside of war, Americans should be happy if each were vigorously pursued! Israel is a foreign nation--remember the USS Liberty?

Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but what is the sense of someone not trying to earn income past the 250K threshold? Arent you only taxed at a higher rate to the extent of the difference between whatever you make over the 250K? You are still going to have more money in the end, right?

Why do we or anyone else care if Iran has nuclear capability? Because Ahmadinejad has already stated that he would use a nuclear option to eliminate Israel. That's why. When we used nuclear weapons we did it under war time to save American lives and end a war. Iran will use it only because of ideological and religious differences. And if they would use one one Israel it sure as hell would not be long before one would some how show up here. That is your answer to why we care.

So what if Iran has missiles? Iran is in a dangerous neighbirhood. Unless the U.S. attacks Iran, I seriously doubt that the U.S. is any danger. And even then I doubt that Iran would go nuclear if the nukes exist to do so.

Israel is threatened by Iran's conventional weapons, but that's not America's problem. Israel has earned her enemies!

Israel and America are separate countries, and Neil will be a better American once he get's over his Israel fetish and takes an honest look at what America's true interests in the Middle East are.

Wasn't it Then-Senator Obama that gave Sen. McCain a hard time when McCain wanted to temporarily postpone a debate to devote all energies to the emerging budget crisis...because a president needed to be able to concentrate on more than one thing at a time? Then his staff come up with the lame excuse that he can't look at foreign policy because he's busy with internal policy? -- And apparently those DVDs can't even be used on the UK equipment. How special.

Welcome the Redneck States of Amurcuh, where backwards twits let politics interfere with doing their jobs (volunteer or otherwise). That there are people so incredibly obsessed with their hatred of a segment of their fellow citizens is telling, indeed.

In before someone defends it with "well libs do it too", in an elementary playground manner.