advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand

Nobody's listening.

I'LL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT

By
Neal Boortz
@ March 13, 2009 8:55 AM
Permalink | Comments (40) | TrackBacks (0)
Barack Obama says that the wants to discuss the idea of lowering corporate tax rates "over time" in exchange for "closing a lot of the loopholes that make the tax system so complex." "Over time?" What's this? Don't' we have an economic crisis? If it was so important that Obama and the Dems get their trillion-dollar stimulus bill by President's Day, why in the world can't they cut corporate taxes just as fast? There are people out there who need jobs ... and these jobs are oversees waiting to come back to America when and if the corporate tax rate comes down. Over time? Yeah, pal. You'll get a new job .... Over time. Besides ... lowering tax rates for the evil, filthy, wealthy corporations? Not a chance that the wealth-envy Democrats will bite on that one.

 

Categories:



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: I'LL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/24430

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Take Back Our Government!

Herman Cain is putting together a movement to take back our government. Do something now! Join the Hermanator's Intelligent Thinkers Movement, HITM! , and take part in the political revolution of 2009! "When they feel the heat, they will see the light!"

Belinda Skelton, Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • I WISH a tax increase gave me a raise!
    "It's a CYCLE. Basic economics. You could just as easily argue that 'workers don't pay taxes, they just pass their needs on to corporations in the form of salary requirements.'"

    Yes, there is a cycle in economics. Glad you know this. Last time there was a tax increase, I didn't go to my boss and ask for a raise. Instead, my wife and I figured out we couldn't go out to eat or visit the movies as much. THAT is the cycle you are looking for. And what does that mean? Less cash for those businesses.

    People may be asking for more, but it doesn't mean the companies are paying. They HAVE to balance THEIR budget (unlike the feds), or they go under.

    I know what your thinking: Republicans couldn't balance the budget either, right? I agree, but that is hardly reason to grant Obama/Pelosi/Reid a pass, ehh?

    Let's meet in the middle, and give credit to Clinton/Gingrich for approaching a balanced budget, closer than anything we've seen in a long time, okay?
  • Where Things Come From
    Some of the confusion about corporate profits stems from incomplete media coverage. It keeps people from knowing where things really come from. Most of us know that Exxon Mobil announced a record $45 billon in profits for 2008. What many don’t know is this was computed after paying $36 billion in income taxes.

    There is more good news. They also paid about $35 billion in sales based taxes and about $45 billion in other taxes. The total contribution in taxes was about $116 billion. This is an incredible contribution to the public works and one that should be celebrated by all.

    This isn’t hard information to find. It all comes from numbers in the same press release with the profit figures. You just have to look at it. www.santaclaussyndrome.com
  • obobmas tax relief??
    bull...he is stalling
  • Deception
    Everything the man says is a fallacy. Check out The Obama Deception. You can find it on YouTube. The global warming scam, the fairness doctrine, the bailouts..everything is put into perspective. Get the word out!
  • Lowering Corporate Taxes
    Obama could accomplish his goal very simply by passing the Fair Tax. That would certainly "lower" corporate taxes. No corp income tax means no holes to loop. Of course then we'd need to monitor Congress to prevent "special, emergency exceptions" to the Fair Tax, but at least they'd be starting w a clean slate.
  • WHAT????
    Alabamastan: "I think there are times where sometimes our economy gets out of balance. This is obviously one of those times," he said. "And so government has to intervene in the crisis, but the goal should always be to right the ship and let private enterprise do its magic."

    Well lets see, then he was talking about a crisis, today he is saying that maybe things are not as bad as first thought.

    Now which do we believe? I have been saying for a long time to watch politics, not politians. Between him and congress they not showing me much and they change their story about every other day or so. So where is the change I can beleieve in? The only change that I have seen is a lot of money being given to special interestgroups, banks and projects that don't mean sqwat to me. All I see is that my 401k is now a 101b and getting smaller, and my retirement is looking like I am going to have to keep working rather recieving something I have worked hard for.

    I hope things change, but I doubt it. He was going to veto earmarks. Now he will do it next time.

    Still wondering where the joke came from:
    "We are from the goverment and we are here to help!"
  • Liberals Are Liars And Hypocrites
    It is impossible to believe that given the several explanations below and elsewhere (e.g. Neal's FairTax book), that liberals are so dense that they don't comprehend that indirect or embedded taxes are paid disproportionately by middle and lower income earners. Likewise for withholding taxes. So, they must have another agenda.

    I believe that agenda is impose government control over industry. By so doing, they seem to believe that the greedy rich will be taken out of the equation. If industry remains private, that would mean fascism; if industry becomes government owned, it becomes socialism. In either case, it is totalitarianism.

    Liberals seem to have some kind of disconnect that suggests that they will somehow be exempt from the rules they would impose on the rest of us (I submit the latest round of cabinet nominees who failed to pay their taxes as exhibit 1).

    There is a further disconnect in which they appear to believe that once they are in complete control, things will suddenly run more smoothly, instead of how they run now (I submit FEMA, ICE, IRS, USDA, etc., as examples of typical bureaucratic efficiency - exhibit 2).

    Ultimately, liberals are afraid of competition because they know they are inferior. They try to use the power of government to eliminate competition lest they only earn what they're really worth. They are envious losers.
  • Free Market Magic
    Obama's words yesterday:

    "I think there are times where sometimes our economy gets out of balance. This is obviously one of those times," he said. "And so government has to intervene in the crisis, but the goal should always be to right the ship and let private enterprise do its magic.

    "Our expectation is that we can use this moment to create a stronger free market system, one that's more stable, one that's more profitable over the long term.”

    I know this won't matter one little bit to all of you whose minds are made up, but I just wanted you to read the words.

    And what the hell is the big deal about using a TelePrompter? Why is it any different from reading a prepared text off paper. Bush did that, though not very well.
  • Corporate Tax
    Was on a teleconference this morning, seems the company is doing well in Asia/Pacific region. We are looking for ways to expand, build new offices, etc. in Asia because "bringing our profits home costs too much in punishing corporate taxes." More and more of our corporation is moving to China/Singapore/Hong Kong/etc.
  • Plenty of data, but you'll just deny it
    After all, once you decide that it's IMPOSSIBLE for corporations to be paying taxes, all the data on corporate-tax revenues will just be waved aside as "passed along directly to the consumer," won't it?

    http://www.cbpp.org/10-16-03tax.htm
    http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/bustaxstats/article/0,,id=97145,00.html

    Even though you have ZERO data to support THAT claim....
  • You always refer to Obama as "President Obama" on first reference, eh?

    I really don't care whether you do or not, but don't lie about it.
  • Obama Comments
    I have a two word reply: Fair Tax
  • I guess I am just stupid
    I have run a small buisness in South Florida that made over 1.5 Million a year profit so I guess I am "ignorant of basic economics!" Taxes are a "Operational Expences" pure plain and simple. We passed them on to the consumer, either directly or indirectly. SO, cut the bull and ---

    SHOW ME THE DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT YOUR STATEMENTS?
  • What a sham
    This is such a sham. Ok, reduce the tax rates and close the loopholes. What's to say that over time the libs won't raise the tax rates again but still keep the loopholes closed?
    Avoid this like the plaque.
  • Copy uses the same teleprompter...
    that B. Hussein Obama does.

    We'll reduce corporate income taxes in 3 1/2 years after we remove the Obama sock puppet from office. In the meantime, work less, fire everyone and enjoy more time with your family.
  • Ignore Copyleft!!!
    please people, dont respond to copyleft's comments. he's an operative from liberal blogs who come to boards such as these to stir up resentment, just for them to use as proof of something later. by reponding to his comments, he looks better to his bosses, and may catch a little extra in his pay bucket at the end of the week. in case you dont know, he's aiming to be mentioned by neal on the air one day, upon which he becomes the proud recipient of a vacation to hawaii to pray at obama's birth house. dont respond to copyleft and his liberal kin...that's exactly what people like him are paid to do: we go to work and actually produce goods and services, and he types messages, the world goes round and round.
  • Corporate Taxes
    Again Copy Left, you LEFT your brains at your gaming website you play on. Quote some facts to back up your moronic statements and you can converse with the adults
  • Corporate Taxes
    Corporations do not print money. Therefore, they must acquire it somewhere in order to pay their tax burdens. There are only three places corporations can collect that money:

    PRICES of goods and services, which the consumers pay. Because there are more middle income and low income consumers than wealthy ones, that piece of corporate tax burden is most heavily levied against the middle and lower income consumers.

    WAGES/SALARIES of corporate employees. Corporations can reduce what they pay in both wages and benefits to their employees to help pay their corporate taxes. Again, because there are more middle and lower income wage & salary earners, they bear the brunt of that portion of corporate taxes. Jobs can also be eliminated, saving the corporation 100 percent of the former employee's salary and benefits.

    SHAREHOLDERS: Corporations can also use money that would otherwise go to shareholders (investors). Anyone who has a pension plan, a 401K, or an IRA is most likely to be a shareholder. So, corporate taxes raid our retirement funds. And since it is the rich who can more easily invest additional funds elsewhere, who do you suppose bears the heaviest burden on taxes taken from shareholders? Middle and lower income wage earners. This particular source of tax income also lowers the desirability of a corporation's stock, which in turn lowers the value of that stock, which in turn also reduces the value our our retirement funds. So, it is a double whammy for middle and lower income earners.

    Additionally, more severe corporate tax burdens require corporations to spend more of their gross profits on tax compliance, because they must hire accountants and lawyers to ensure they do not inadvertently under pay their taxes. These costs, too, must be covered by a combination of the above three mentioned revenue sources.

    Bottom line is that corporations are tax collectors. They do not have the ability to create money from thin air, so they must collect it from a combination of the above mentioned three sources. In all three cases, it is NOT the upper income earners who are most heavily burdened; it is the middle and lower income earners.

    So, anyone who advocates for raising corporate taxes is really advocating for disproportionately raising the taxes of the middle and lower income earners.
  • Copyleft, you almost made sense there...
    Copyleft, first, please do not talk about anyone's ignorance of basic economics...glass houses and all that.

    With that said, you are correct in one respect....yes, corporations cannot just raise prices infinitely. But this is for exactly two reasons: 1) eventually, no one will buy their stuff, 2) competition will lower prices and kill them.

    Let's us an example and I hope you read this and follow along... I know others have given up hope on you, but I am still going to try:

    Company A is producing widgets and selling them at a small profit (it has to be small because of free market competition...as you yourself pointed out). Suddenly, taxes go up and it no longer makes sense to sell widgets at the current price....it's not enough to cover their increased expense. They now have 2 choices: raise the price, or stop making widgets and close down. Well, with increased taxes on everybody, all corporations are affected the same way, so they can all raise prices just enough to cover the increased cost and still stay in business (hopefully). However, as you so rightly pointed out, after a point no one is going to buy your product. If no company can sell widgets at a profit, they will all stop making them. As you can see, lowering prices is never an option, and since, due to competition, your profit margins are already too small to absorb a big cost increase, you really only have 2 choices: Raise prices which everybody will have to pay, or stop making the product. So that translates to either higher prices or lost jobs. Terrific.

    It's really funny, Copyleft, because you said it yourself: "infinite cost-absorption does not exist in the real world" and you are 100% correct...

    That includes the costs of higher taxes!!!

    Now, about corps moving money overseas.... we are talking about where they are holding cash to avoid taxes, not where they set up operations such as factories, etc. Two different things....so your "sweatshop" argument does not apply here. And in any case, your statement that taxes aren't a big portion of cost is inane...35% is a HUGE portion of cost.
  • To: Alan
    Simpler question: Where do consumers and workers get the money to pay THEIR taxes?

    Answer: From employer corporations.

    See? It's a CYCLE. Basic economics. You could just as easily argue that "workers don't pay taxes, they just pass their needs on to corporations in the form of salary requirements."

    Neal's running a smokescreen here, and too many people are ignorant of economics to spot the lies.
  • Money doesn't grow on trees, but morons do
    Why can't the corporations pass the taxes on to the customer. Let's say I make coffee cups, and the gods (wannabees) of the beltway decide that a $1 tax per cup would be nifty. Am I going to absorb the loss? NO! Why should I when I know full well that the same tax is on every other cup manufacturer and we each squeek by on a 20 cent profit per cup already. If you were my competitor how much of a loss would you suck up trying to win the cup-war?
  • Clean-up on aisle copy-left
    simple question - where do companies get the money to pay their taxes?

    Yes, companies physically pay taxes.
    But the money they use to pay those taxes is generated from the consumer.

    Some taxes are fixed costs, some are variable, but all are figured into their expenses and all are accounted for when pricing their good/service.

    Basic economics ...
  • Prezbo Puh-leeze
    His ratings were dropping right along with the stock market as he unveiled his "stimulus" and tax raising plans. This is a man who relied on what the focus groups said - so it only follows suit that he'd try to placate the mob now, by appearing to care about wall street and those "evil rich" people who actually will be paying for the "stimulus."

    The only problem is that the mob doesn't know that they'll be paying those higher taxes in the price of their goods. But it's okay, big daddy Obama will be sending you morons your "tax cuts" in the form of a government check. WAKE UP PEOPLE! THIS IS THE CYCLE OF GOVERNMENT DEPENDENCY BEGINNING! THEY *WANT* YOU TO NEED THEM - THEY ARE BUYING YOUR VOTE!
  • $ for the people
    Whats wrong with wanting to make sure something is done is the proper manner?

    Its not just about cutting taxes, but also closing the crazy loopholes in our system.

    Its about putting money into the hands of the more people and allowing them to decide where to spend their hard earned money. That's truly a free market.
    That's what you advocate everyday on your show, right? Why not stand behind this initiative?

    More money into the hands of more people and let them decide where best to spend it. Let businesses fight for customers!!
  • As I explained yesterday...
    The claim "corporations don't pay taxes" can only be made by someone ignorant of basic economics, or who has an ideological axe to grind.

    Corporations CAN'T "simply pass along all taxes as operating expenses" because of demand limitations and a competitive environment. Jack up your prices too high, and consumers will simply stop buying your stuff... especially if your competitors manage to eat some of that cost and keep their prices lower.

    At most, corporate taxes are divided between the corporation's own profits and the general population. The notion that "corporations don't pay taxes" is just silly. Infinite cost-absorption doesn't exist in the real world.

    As to why corporations move overseas despite paying among the LOWEST taxes in the developed world, that's easy: Taxes just aren't that big a portion of operating costs. Anyone who's run a business can tell you that it's LABOR making up the vast majority of your costs, not taxes. And where can you operate a sweatshop for 8 cents an hour...? You got it.

    Sorry, folks, but not matter how many times you chant "Corporations don't pay taxes," that doesn't make it true.
  • Unions!
    So with all the hoop-la about the Corp tax reduction, then the Card Check bill will be passed and Corporations will still not come home because of the threat of union organization by intimidation! This administration will see to it that this country is destroyed from within as has been predicted for years by those "in the know"! And BTW, the Republicrats aren't any better either! In fact, I'd say that they are the worst of the two. At least you KNOW what to expect from a Demonacrat!

    It's time for a new Political Party to come into power that will look out for "We The People" instead of "I, Me and Mine"!
  • Manipulative Obama
    I like how Obama has been claiming that this is the worst economic crisis we've had since the Great Depression and today in this story:
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/12/obama-declares-economic-crisis-bad-think/

    Obama says the crisis is not as bad as we think and that he has seen public opinion seesaw without logic.

    Why should he expect logic from the people? They're the same illogical boneheads who elected him. They hang on his every word and he convinced them the sky was falling.

    Now that he's passed the stimulus package and needs it to work he's suddenly thinks the economy isn't so bad.

    Obama is the best politician ever because he can manipulate Americans like no one ever has in the past. This also makes him the most dangerous politician ever.
  • ONLY PEOPLE PAY TAXES!
    I had HOPED that you would stress the point that ONLY PEOPLE PAY TAXES. ALL taxes get passed along to customers, clients, shareholders or employees of a business. Hope you will drive that home during the program.
  • No net change
    So ... at best, BHO promises (HA!) that he'll lower the tax rate after effectively raising it by eliminating legal tax deductions (aka "loopholes"), resulting in no net change. Much sound and fury signifying nothing.

    At worst, he'll eliminate the loopholes and then (as Dems have done repeatedly over decades) never quite get around to lowering the tax rate - effectively increasing it instead.

    Where's the incentive to support this?
  • I'll gladly pay you tuesday, for a hamburger today.
    This is a variation on the same play the dp suckered President GHW Bush with. They got him to go along with raising taxes, breaking his promise, for a promise that they would make equal spending cuts. They never got around to the spending cuts, of course.

    Here they will close the 'loopholes,' and never get around to lowering the rate. I Wish I could say the GOP was too smart to fall for that one again.
  • Copyleft, why don't you get it!
    Copyleft,
    I have a question for you? Who do you think pay Corporate Taxes? Do you A) beleive that companys pay the taxs or do you beleive B) the consumer pays corporate taxes because the companys just past them off as a OPERATING Expence?

    The correct answer should be B. So why is it so hard for you to beleive that taxing companies is bad? That Tax is passed on to the consumer and that raises the cost of the products. This hurts the poor and the middle class because now their dollars do not buy as much. If you can not under stand this I guess you are mentally challenged.

    Now to be fair, if you can point me to 1 factual document that shows Companies pay the taxs, I will be more then happy to read it and give credit where credit is do.
  • BO and taxes
    First, no point in paying attention to what he says. It's what he does that speaks truth.

    Second, what is the Fairtax status now? When we overthrow the current idiots in government, I say that's the first official act. ;->
  • Zug Switzerland via Caribbean via US
    To Neal's point that the "evil rich" always find creative ways to avoid paying taxes and to reinforce the point of this Newz blurb, corporations are moving to Zug Switzerland because they've set their corporate tax rate well below 10%.
    States in Switzerland are allowed, by law, to set corporate rates themselves.
  • Crisis Averted
    You need to read Drudge, the crisis has been averted.
  • CopyLeft
    The more you post the more irrelevant you become.

    I know you can fix ignorance some people are just unfixable, incorrigible, aren't wired right, or just have frayed wires. Take your pick we'll understand.
  • ?
    That's why companies are flocking to America at the moment, right? Because America's government has made us such a tax haven.
  • Another Example
    This is becomining a daily routine. Yesterday, it was earmarks, today it's cutting corp taxes!

    Obozo's people are hearing the economists say that corporate taxes are the 2nd highest in the world, and that lowering taxes would spur growth, so they then decide that it would be a good idea to SAY they are supportive of that. So, they punch in those words in his teleprompter for him to read to the dumb masses even though they are in the process of doing the exact opposite!

    Copyleft - One would think that after being on these boards and reading people's well thought out rebuttals to your nonsense, that you would eventually learn a thing or two. As a typical braindead lib, though, you just bury your head in the sand and continue to parrot the same garbage over and over.

    For the 1,000,000th time, corporations DO NOT pay taxes. You will get a nice hands-on learning class when cap and trade passes. When your energy bills skyrocket next year, you will see who pays these increased corp taxes.
  • economy
    Neal,

    Apparently we don't have an economic crisis. But I'm confused. Was it not just a month or so ago that Obama said we were facing economic catastrophe? And now it's not as bad as we think? Why anyone would believe anyting this man says is astounding to me. Stupidity comes to mind. Beyond that created in government schools.
  • Why the confusion?
    Oh, I see the problem. Neal's still going on the assumption that corporate taxes are

    1. A problem, and
    2. A priority.

    They're neither, sorry. Closing some of the loopholes that result in American corporations paying the LEAST taxes of any Western nation... now, that's a legitimate priority.
  • Obama's Action Items
    Obama's To Do List - daily.

    1) Sign bill
    2) Introduce a 'plan' to do the opposite of what the bill actually does
    3) Read the press about the plan, not the bill.
    4) Repeat (taxes, earmarks, transparency, bank bailout.)
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement