advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com
Today's Nuze

THE BOORTZ CAVEAT

While listening to The Neal Boortz show or reading Nealz Nuze there is a strong likelihood that you will hear or read material that is critical of Barack Obama or the liberal agenda.  In keeping with the dictates of political correctness it is hereby acknowledged that any critical comments by Neal Boortz, a white guy, of Barack Obama, a black guy; or any comments critical of the Democrat agenda, is, by default, hate speech.

WELL .. THAT WAS RATHER INTERESTING

By
Neal Boortz
@ January 5, 2009 8:12 AM
Permalink | Comments (26) | TrackBacks (0)
... 2008, I mean. Democrat and (to some extent) Republican schemes to make every American, no matter how qualified, a homeowner leads to financial disaster, everybody with a business license is lining up for government (taxpayer) largess, the YouTube and Entertainment Tonight generation - people who have no clue in the world how our government actually works or who the key players are - turn a presidential election into a glorified version of American Idol, and now our wonderful elected officials in Washington are getting ready to vote on and pass a ONE TRILLION dollar stimulus bill without even so much as reading it.

We - and by "we," I means those of us who actually work and pay the taxes that keeps this government behemoth well fed - have completely lost control.

Have you heard about some of the people lined up at the stimulus trough? The latest? Newspapers! You got it .. newspapers want some of the bailout money. This isn't new, actually. I remember an article a few weeks ago where someone was suggesting that the government set up a fund - taxpayer money of course - to pay journalists and writers who lost their jobs. An excuse? Yup - this joker had an excuse. These people and their precious journalistic abilities were just too important to our culture to let them actually go out and have to find a job out of their field if they find themselves laid off. So ... to save them the pain of having to find a job they don't particularly like, the government needs to step forward and pay them ... I guess pay them to write stuff. Of course, if the government is paying them you can bet they're going to write stuff that will make the government happy. Just like those government-funded global warming "scientists."

Right now Ford Motor Company is offering cars with 0% car loans. Do you want to know how they pulled this off? With GMAC, that's how. It seems that General Motors only has a minority stake in GMAC, and GMAC is now using bailout money to make these car loans available to Ford buyers. So, what's wrong with this? Well, if you will remember, Ford said it didn't need any bailout money. They were going to do this on their own. So now we have Ford competing against the other two-thirds of the Big Three with 0% car loans made possible by government bailout money. In short, the politicians picked a winner here, and the winner was Ford. You didn't get to pick .. the government picked for you. The one company that didn't need bailout help now has a government-funded advantage over the two companies that did.

Also in line .. in case you aren't keeping a scorecard here ... the U.S. steel industry. Orders of steel from domestic manufacturers are down. What to do? Why, get the government to spend more taxpayer money on steel orders, that's what? These companies can't sell their products on the free market, so they ask the government to make a consumer choice the consumers clearly don't want to make.

Back to my theme: Clearly we have lost control of this process. Government is in the ascendancy, individual liberty, self-reliance and economic freedom are the losers. The politicians in Washington have no real fear of the voters. They know that in all probability they are going to be reelected no matter what they do. The true allegiance of these people in the congress is to the big donors and business interests that provide the bulk of the campaign cash. They just spend year after year building a power base and adding on the privileges and perks. It truly has become an imperial congress. If you want a definition of "imperial," try this one: "characterizing the rule or authority of a sovereign state over its dependencies; domineering; imperious."

Several weeks ago I made a suggestion as to how we might put the fear of God into our rulers in Washington. I got the idea from Georgia's Insurance Commissioner John Oxendine and just expanded on it a bit. Since we all have rather short attention spans (go ahead, name your two Senators and your Congressman) I thought I would remind you of the idea here today.

We need a Constitutional Convention. More specifically, we need a Constitutional Convention called for the sole purpose of adding three specific amendments to the United States Constitution. The convention would consider these three amendments ... and nothing further. Two-thirds of the States need to pass a resolution calling for such a convention, and those resolutions need to be specifically worded so as to limit the purpose of the convention to these three amendments. Without that limitation we're going to have left-wing fools trying to add amendments guarantying such things as a right to a job, a place to live and health care. Not good.

So .. what are the three amendments? (You don't listen to me all that much, do you?) Very simple ...

  1. An amendment to the Constitution repealing the 16th Amendment. What is the 16th Amendment? That would be the income tax. By repealing the 16th Amendment the Congress would be forced to come up with a new way of generating the revenue needed for the legitimate functions of our government.
  2. An amendment repealing the 17th Amendment. The 17th Amendment calls for the popular election of U.S. Senators. Before the 17th Amendment each state legislature would appoint that state's two Senators. The congressmen were in Washington to represent the people, and the Senators were there to represent the states. Right now the government of Mexico has an official representative in Washington; the government of New Mexico does not. This enables the federal government to run roughshod over the states with unfounded mandates and other federal demands. Give the state governments a voice in Washington .. repeal the 17th Amendment.
  3. An amendment setting term limits for members of the House of Representatives. Give them three terms, then send them home. Yes, I know, there are some people we would truly like to keep up there to pursue some worthy objectives, but in the balance we're hurt by those who spend taxpayer money to solidify their power than we are would be by sending the few good representatives home at the end of six years.

Now .. here's the reality here. The Congress would probably never permit this Constitutional Convention to be called. As soon as they saw state legislatures passing the resolutions to bring these things to pass we would see the members of congress trying to beat the citizens to the punch. No ... they're not going to send the choice of Senators back to the states, and they're unlikely to set term limits for themselves. But we might actually see some movement on the repeal of the 16th Amendment and serious consideration given to the FairTax.

Dreaming? Maybe so, but maybe not. Get the right grassroots organization formed to push this idea for a Constitutional Convention and you just might rattle some cages in Washington. Who knows? Maybe the people might start counting again.



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: WELL .. THAT WAS RATHER INTERESTING.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://boortz.com/blogging/mt-tb.cgi/16895

Jamie Dupree's Blog

If you enjoy Neal's daily chat with Jamie Dupree, you'll love Jamie's Blog! Check it out for analysis of the campaigns and goings on in Washington D.C.

Take Back Our Government!

Herman Cain is putting together a movement to take back our government. Do something now! Join the Hermanator's Intelligent Thinkers Movement, HITM! , and take part in the political revolution of 2009! "When they feel the heat, they will see the light!"

Belinda Skelton, Cristina Gonzalez and Laura Nunemaker assist in the daily preparation of Nealz Nuze!


Avg. rating: N/A

What others are saying

  • Convention
    I just forwarded this to my Ron Paul group.... if this is a go, it will spread like wildfire. Nobody can get organized like Ron Paul'ers.
  • Yes, term limits are bad
    Another example: my Assemblyman was hard-driving and energitic; rapidly rose in the party ranks. But after he got elected to his 3rd & last term he just went dormant.

    A thought experiment: let's say you have a gardener whom you pay monthly at the beginning of the month. At the beginning of one month you pay him and tell him this will be his last month. How hard is he going to work on your garden that last month? Why do you think an elected official has any different human nature, especially when the stakes run into millions of dollars?

    The only thing making them pay ANY attention to the voters is the threat they won't be reelected. Remove that incentive and you have California. (OK, OK, I'll concede that's a generalization not fair to be applied to EVERY elected official but it's true for WAY too many.)
  • term limits are the wrong solution, Boortz
    Term limits are an arbitrary solution that don't address the real problem. We have a "term limit" solution (if it worked right) - it's called the ballot box. Fix the way elections are done, by changing the voting method to something SANE instead of simple plurality (I'd recommend Condorcet voting), and the problem will solve itself.
  • One more....
    Raise the minimum age of anybody elected to Washington to 50 (perhaps 55 in the case of the president & vice president). Life's experiences are a good thing when making laws that govern the rest of us.
  • term limits
    According to Werner's argument, term limits are a bad idea, because it will force them to be crooked quicker. ? Huh?

    Maybe to people he would vote for, but no one I'd vote for. On the other hand, the real crooks, the career crooks, would not consider politics if they knew they wouldn't be retiring in office.

    In this way, term limits would discourage the bad guys and make way for people who only want to serve the people, instead of rape them.
  • 17th Amendment
    I still support getting rid of 17th Amendment, but State Legislators need to do it. After seeing what has happened in NY with an unelected Governor appointing Ms Strassburg-Kennedy, Blago-Burris-Reid, and here in Colorado the Governor appointed the head of Denver Public Schools (a gov. school yes man), there needs to be some bounds on the politics of it.
  • Repeal of the 17th Amendment
    Neil, I've been telling everyone who would listen for years that the best thing America could do to right itself would be to repeal the 17th Amendment and give the States their voices back.
    The founders were very intelligent men, and this was one of the best provisions they gave us, and the only one that was a real check on the growth of the Federal government. Let's get this one done, and the Fair Tax, but without a Constitutional Convention, as these are dangerous.
  • Article V Convention
    I'd like to let everyone know that there is a grassroots organization already in existence to promote an Article V Convention. The group is Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC). Its website is www.foavc.org.

    I'd suggest all who commented here take time to go to the site. Many people, including the author himself, have factual errors in their statements.

    I'll only highlight some of them. First of all the states have applied for a convention in numbers more than needed. The Constitution says Congress must call if 34 states apply. The public record shows that all 50 states have submitted more than 650 applications for a convention. Congress has, of course, refused to obey the Constitution and call a convention.

    The texts of these applications can be read at www.foavc.org the only location where they are available.

    For the record, repeal of the 16th Amendment currently has 39 states submitting applications for that issue. Term limits has been applied for by several states and while repeal of the 17th Amendment has not been asked for by any state, the fact is the applications for it are still valid as Congress did not discharge them when it drafted the 17th Amendment. A read of the 31 applications indicates that the issue would have to be revisited by the convention because they also asked for direct election of the president and vice president as well as senators.

    I hope this information helps all interested in the subject.
  • Amendments
    In addition to your three amendment changes...I have a fourth. This one simple overarching amendment, if added to the Constitution, would immediately put a STOP to the out of control government TODAY. My idea is to word the amendment something like this...

    " for every new law promulgated, for every new tax and fee imposed on the people, for every new program or enterprise instigated by the Governement of the United States, TWO equal laws, taxes, fees, programs or enterprises must be REMOVED from the books before the new law, tax or program can be signed into law."

    Can you imagine the implications of such an amendment? It is the answer to everything we are complaining about. Placing a requirement to remove existing laws would not mean that new laws could not be written that are consequential to today's times...it only forces the legislature to think twice about passing any more new "great society" plans on all of us.
  • Con-con again?
    Why do people keep pushing for a con-con? This is the worst idea we could have--if you believe it was worship and ignorance that gave Obama the Presidency, why would you let those same flaws in to completely rewrite the Constitution? The people are too stupid today to do that, and would likely end up adding more, bad ammendments than repealing them.
  • Already being attempted
    As I understand it, right now we are only 2 states short of having a con-con called for, and Neil is wrong, they can go for anything during a con-con, that's why this is extremely dangerous. It would be better, although more expensive and time consuming to get good people who want to actually change this country for the better in office.
  • Term limits = very, very bad idea
    I really wish you term limits zealots would take a look at CA. These guys KNOW they never have to face the voters again during their last term. And they KNOW they're out of a job after that last term. WHAT DO YOU THINK THEIR ENTIRE LAST TERM WILL BE DEDICATED TO, HUH? DO YOU REALLY THINK THEY'LL GIVE A HOOT ABOUT THEIR "CONSTITUENTS"? They're setting themselves up for a cush job with some special interest group and will be using YOUR tax money to do it. (Take a look at what Fabien Nunez, former speaker of the Assembly, did; out of office on Friday, in a sweetheart position on Monday.) Now take the CA fiasco and multiply that up to the Federal level. You think it's bad now just wait until the Law of Unintended Consequences kicks in.

    Neal and fellow fanatics, can you think beyond step 1?
  • One More
    Those three are good. But one more Amendment needs to be amended. The 14th Amendment needs to have a sunset clause added to end the Anchor Baby fiasco.
    Don't know about that? Read this:
    http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters4608
  • Effects of bailouts
    The effect of each one of the recent (and more coming day by day) bailouts is like a thermonuclear economic bomb, ripping the U.S. economy to shreds. The cumulative effect is total disaster. We are reaping the whirlwind sown by Keynes. Trying to spend our way out of this situation (which was caused by out of control spending) is like trying to screw your way out of an unwanted pregnancy. Time to bail (and I don't mean bail"out"). You do have an escape plan you've been working towards for 10-20 years, don't you? You don't? Gosh, that's terrible. Mine's coming along nicely.
  • How to restrict it?
    You know those morons would want to look at Amendments #1 and #2. Neal, how do you restrict it to just the three you mentioned??? Other than that scary thought, I'm all for it.
  • Pipe Dream
    I know this is a pipe dream, but if we could find a way for our federally elected respresentatives (and Senators) to focus on affairs at the federal level, with universal benefit for all all americans, rather than what they can "bring home" to their state/constituencies, it would go a long way toward solving these problems.
    Yes, there should be a litmus test, and rather than pork projects and state and local agendas finding their way into federal appropriations bills, I would even favor a "fair spend" or taxpayer dollars on a prorata basis to states to spend on what the state legislatures deem most important for their communities.
  • Con-Con
    As I understand it, if a Con-Con was to be called and held then all bets are off. There would be no restrictions on subjects discussed and or debated reguardless of the original intent of the convention. We could end up with a completely new Constitution writen by individuals who, even in their best days could not hold the jock strap of the least of our founding fathers.
    There are term limits now. House of Reps= 2 years, Senate=6 years, POTUS=4 years. Our problem is with the dumbmasses who think its their right to vote and unelected officials who answer to no one for their actions.
    Unfourtunatly, we have very few statesmen seeking public office. And those who do are labled as fringe lunatics stuck in the 18th century. But there is a grassroots movement, campaignforliberty.com where the debate and search for those who will follow our Constitution as it was written those many years ago.
  • The Constitutional Convention proposal
    good idea. I like them all, and shall get on my local representatives and newspaper on it ASAP.

    Only question I have is if there are others that need the same convention proposal.
  • Senator Selection
    Repeal the 17th amendment? Because you like the Blago scandal and want to see it happen often, or because you really think that these wiseguys would really select the most capable individuals for the job? Sorry, as much as I don't believe what we currently have is optimal, I'm not willing to toss it without knowing what the alternative is.
  • New USSR
    It's time to change nomenclature. The Congress should now be called the Central Committee, as in composition, temperament and privilege, the Congress is no different from the elite handpicked Central Committee that ran the Soviet Union. No one, not even the Hollywood elite, deserves less respect than the corrupt yahoos who are America's privileged, power-greedy political class and are running this country into the ground.
  • Con-Con
    Since the Civil War, con-con's lost popularity, but they're NOT unprecidented. See Michael Reagan's 1996 book "Making Waves", and Thomas E Woods's Book "33 Questions".
  • More at the trough....
    ....let's see, the ice man that used to deliver the ice to keep our food cold; the milkman that used to deliver milk daily; the neighborhood butcher; the craftsmen (er, PEOPLE) that made all the harnesses for the horse drawn wagons; for all who read this and say 'what a dumb idea'; it is no less than what is going on with these bailouts.

    Companies & technologies that are in the process of being outdated are now using whatever they can to stay relevant. Problem is, they are sucking the life out of the US economy.
  • Convention
    Neal,

    You're spot on! I've been emailing my Senators and my Rep repeatedly about having a few Amendments. I have called for repealing the 17th Amendment, as well as term limits. I say 2 terms for a Rep, and one term for a Senator!
  • Constitonal Convention
    I am all for it IF and ONLY IF the First and Second Amendments are completely off the table. My gut feeling right now is that some lawmakers would love to see freedom of speech limited and right to bear arms eliminated.
  • Constitional Convention
    How about also abolishing the interstate commerce clause, the necessary and proper clause, and the general welfare clause.
  • economy quick fixes
    1- tax remittances to foreign countries 10%
    2- require a tag/tax bicycles for thier use of paved roads. Cars require it.
    3- bill all foregin countries for illegal aliens use of healthcare and jails. There was a buill passed which allows this, but is never enforced.
    4- increase liscencing charges for builders. Allowing anyone who can pay $45 to be a builder and over building has helped lead to the housing collapse.
    5- steralization chemicals in the drinking water. if you cannot figure out why you are sterile, you are not smart enough to have kids (and make someone else pay for them).
    6- ticket unruley children the same way barking dogs which will not stop are.
    7- convict work forces for road improvements.
    8- legalize and tax marijuana, prostitution, and gambling
    9- sunday alchohol sales.
    10- vote for a third party. Both sides fo the aisle are fat pigs who no longer represent the taxpayer.
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement