Report Abuse

You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.

I think Boortz is not being consistent here with his arguments.<br> <br> If 'pro-life' is wrong because it implies that the other side is 'anti-life' and would go against life in all instances, isn't 'pro-choice' wrong on the same grounds?<br> <br> By Boortz' logic, the 'anti-choice' people would be against choice at all times. Just as he implied the 'anti-life' person would try to run over a person on a bike, wouldn't an 'anti-choice' person be against all choices included such innocuous issues as "Should we have chicken or fish tonight?".<br> <br> There could be an argument to be made that 'pro-life' is not the correct term, but, in attempting to be controversial with his listeners on this issue, Boortz has only managed to be logically inconsistent.
By Jessica

Your name
Explanation
Security Code	* Please enter the code shown above