advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com

Report Abuse

You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.

I see that many of the wingnuts are scared and confused today. I'll try to clear it up for you, using small words...<br> <br> Jeff: "Why do the left want to ruin the US when there are other countries that they could move to today and have what they want?"<br> Why do you assume we want to "ruin" the U.S. simply because we feel differently on political issues than you do? If it helps, I'll be glad to assume that far-right conservatives secretly (or openly) want to "ruin" the U.S. just because they're wrong all the time. Is it a deal?<br> <br> CarrieB: Mark already explained how you got the hypocrisy argument backwards. Neal is on record as regularly sneering at anyone with a liberal-arts degree, much less philosophy or sociology. I've made no demands of anyone with such a degree--certainly not expecting everyone in academia to "repeat the leftist line," as you smugly and incorrectly assume. Bottom line: Neal is hypocritical when it serves his political agenda.<br> <br> Navy Buckeye: If you'd like to debate the definition of "liberal," I'm all for it. As a first step you can abandon the absurd claim that America is inherently "conservative," especially when so many supposedly 'conservative' voters keep electing Republicans who turn out not to be "conservative" at all... at least, when you hear their post-mortem excuses.<br> <br> $mooth Operator: "By unintentionally equating American "progressives" to unreconstructed Soviet Communists you admit what your ideological goals are."<br> Only in your fevered imagination, $O.. I suggested that free-market cheerleaders and Randroids might be happier in the collapsed, regulation-free mess that is the former USSR. How you got "I love communism" out of that is your problem, not mine.<br> <br> Oh, and it's cognitive DISSONANCE, not resonance.<br> <br> Scott: "You obviously live by the philosophy...."<br> Keep up with those assumptions, I'm sure that's much easier than making an argument.<br> <br> Joyce: "America is set up as a small government business"<br> Huh? Where'd you pull that fantasy from? Our country was never set up as a business, small or otherwise. And when was the intended size of government spelled out in the Constitution?<br> <br> ACE: "Here we have a letter from a person that the left deems the only group “allowed” to criticize Fauxbama for obvious reasons."<br> Wrong on all counts, ACE. Anyone's allowed to criticize Obama. It's just an amusing coincidence that most of those who do have turned out to be pig-ignorant wingnuts so far.<br> <br> Tony: No, as Alabamastan already pointed out, she was ASSUMING that people could only have voted for Obama out of ignorance, because "only ignorant people would vote differently from me." It's a common delusion of the right-wing extremist. Maybe we'll find a vaccine someday....<br> <br> Lots of fun, folks! I'm enjoying the harpooning of right-wing idiocy during a slow work week. Let's do it again real soon. (chuckle)
By Copyleft

Security Image

* Please enter the code shown above
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement