advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com

Report Abuse

You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.

"Mailman (and others) - I would disagree with your notion that we should return to constitutional spending. Maybe I'm wrong here (and please correct me) but what would happen to spending on things like the FAA, Fisheries, Parks dept, EPA, nuclear regulatory agencies, pubic schools, interstate hwy's, interstate commerce dept, the SEC, and other departments like that? fed spending that really shouldn't be privatized but isn't really part of defense?<br> <br> again, could be wrong on how that would flow via the constitution. Can anyone speak to that?<br> By Mark @ 04/14/09 02:56:51 PM"<br> Anything not specified as Federal responsibility pertaining to spending is by default relegated to the province of "Local" government or private and personal responsibility.I dare say most programs fed by the Federal government would be better left to state and local administration or dismantled to come up with a better idea.Everything in our lives does not need federal oversight.The individual and up is where to start,not the supreme government and down.
By mailman

Security Image

* Please enter the code shown above
send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement
advertisement