Report Abuse
You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.
If I were an executive and I were promised money to keep a company floating, you can be absolutely certain that I would want my compensation even if the government gave bailout money.<br> <br> But, there should never have been any bailout money. The bailout money is what made the current situation what it is. AIG would not have had the money to pay their execs if the feds had not given them the cash to honor their contracts. How much different would that be if the Big Three Auto Makers took bailout money and honored their contracts to creditors? Aren't unpaid employees (including execs) creditors?<br> <br> And another thing, for all the liberals who believe in evolution and the Darwinian principle, I have this closing thought. If Darwinism preaches that the strong survive, why was a weak company like AIG allowed to live by bailing it out instead of letting economic Darwinism take over and natural selection kill off the weak?<br> <br> Be consistent. It's one thing to believe one way on one particular issue or circumstance and then take a 180 degree turn on another particular issue or circumstance. Being consistent in your beliefs is being principled. Otherwise search Webster's for the word "expedient."
By brevard bum
Search Boortz.com
