You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.
Re: Brandon<br> <br> "defending the actions of the scum of humanity rather than their victims" is empty nonsense. Liberals do not defend the actions of terrorists and cop killers, whereas Republicans do defend torturers and murderer-cops, as well as the terrorists they happen to like at any given time.<br> <br> But as for my comment, which was as you initially guessed not a lack of reading comprehension (which happens to be much higher in more liberal "blue" states):<br> <br> Republican elite like those at Halliburton and Blackwater have recieved hundreds of millions in government contracts they didn't earn, and Republican elite in general get tons of government benefits they don't want to pay for in taxes, so I think "welfare recipients" is applicable.<br> <br> Criminals is true at well, with crimes including treason (Reagan's terrorist supporting cronies, especially North) as well as corruption and war profiteering (Cheney, Gonzales, etc.). That's not to mention flagrant violation of the Constitution. <br> <br> Deadbeats, like a loser who has never done anything well or a crappy actor (and crappy union leader), who just happened to be elected president. And the corrupt are included here too, since they live off government bale without any real need.<br> <br> Lowlifes, which includes the deadbeats, criminals, and corrupt mentioned above. There's also people like Gingrich who try to impeach a president based on pure politics on the basis of infidelity, while he himself is cheating on his wife. And, of course, Foley, Haggard, and Craig types.<br> <br> Michael Savage, who you brought up, is a perfect example for "losers". Savage, actually "Weiner", is a bitter ex-beatnik and leftist intellectual who turned to ultraconservative radio because he wasn't good enough to be a professor. And the various totally unaccomplished fools who get prominent government positions under the Republicans, including at least two of their presidents.<br> <br> ------<br> <br> To say that the unions created the failures in the auto industry is nonsense. They simply failed to make competitive vehicles, especially in the way they pushed huge SUVs and pickups as people became more and more concerned about fuel economy as fuel got beyond $4/gallon. Japanese and European car companies are unionized as well.<br> <br> More generally, the many failures in industries today were caused by a widespread system of bad loans and resulting decreasing consumer and investor confidence. Not unions. By Lent Visor
Search Boortz.com
