Report Abuse

You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.

Rather than advancing our America by demanding that its politicians remain firm in their utterances and holding them accountable to their decrees, your feeble response to Boortz is “so what?” What kind of farcical charity is that? Did at any time Boortz promote political honesty of others. The point here is that PEBO’s chief dais was that of revolutionizing the political norm, breaking the mold, which he more aptly masqueraded as CHANGE because simple-minded, imperceptive numbnuts such as the “So What” crowd can only be au fait with minimalism. Without a doubt, in his sculpted nomination process, BO shrewdly harvested support from the far left liberals with his authentic teleprompter speechifying unambiguously stanchioned by his analogous track record to which should have nauseated most conservatives. Cacophonously, following this ill-fated conquest, BO’s tide deceivingly, but appositely, convexed into a charade of moderacy exclusively stupefying pubescent opposition and flummoxing all the remaining dolts deficient moral code and sagacity. He, however, can not be solely credited with this byzantine scheme. That award would go to that fly-by, leftist biased, now to be proven useless and dead, media with its incessant proclamations of Bush’s ignominy, as spurious as they were, and the invincibility and imperviousness of BO to chronicled, sordid associations and scandals regardless of verity. In the same manner as BO ran his deceitful campaign, this charlatan, with much aid from baselessly venerated media, continues to carry out his connive by appointing so-called moderates to menial positions, recycling Clintonian cronies, and artfully choosing a renowned pastor to give his invocation. But really… So What. Keep drinkin’ that Kool-Aid.
By SRH

Your name
Explanation
Security Code	* Please enter the code shown above