advertisement

The world-famous Internet site of the Nationally Syndicated Neal Boortz Show!

Search Boortz.com
Enter search terms:
Browse Boortz.com

Report Abuse

You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.

It's not that conservatives don't think about consevring natural resources or preserving natural beauty. It's a matter of not trying to dictate to our country or any other country that we all have to fall in lockstep with Al Gore and others who believe in'GW' or 'CC'. There is no concensus on whatever the nom du jour is for whatever we are supposedly doing to the environment. Al Gore beat out a Polish woman for the Nobel Prize. What did she do? She helped save hundreds of Jews from Nazi death camps. But since Al is trying to save the Polar Bears and he outspent the woman's PR dept., he got the Prize. Instant credibility...not with me. Probably not with the Polar Bears either. It's not science when directors and editors resort to adding clips of Polar Bears traversing ice floes. Laurie David is not a scientist. Al Gore has a degree in Law, does he not? Is it hard to understand why so many rational, logical thinkers don't take it seriously? Or am I talking way over the heads of the people who think the rest of us are the problem?
By Chuck

Security Image

* Please enter the code shown above
advertisement
advertisement