Our ethically-challenged Attorney General Eric Holder decided that it would be a great idea to bring 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammad to the United States to be tried. Well ... wait a minute. Let's get real here. It wasn't our pathetic Attorney General who made this decision .. it was the president; The Community Organizer. As the husband of a 9/11 victim said "Obama has transformed an act of war into a crime. And here comes KSL to New York City where he will get every protection our Constitution has to offer. Obama believes that the mastermind of 9/11 is nothing more than a criminal, rather than what he is really is: an Islamic goon, a terrorist, an enemy combatant, a prisoner of war. What we are seeing is the politics of the left trumping national security and common sense.

Just another reason to be so proud of those voters out there who fell for this "Change we can believe in" line. Here's your change: Acts of war become mere criminal acts.

Critics are concerned that this will quickly turn into a trial about Bush anti-terror policies, rather than the prosecution of a sick mastermind who killed 3,000 Americans. Rudy Giuliani says it best, "The government is going to try to put Khalid Sheik Mohammed on trial. Defense lawyers will try and put the government on trial." That is what we have to look forward to. Thank you, Oh Chosen One (mmm, mmm mmm) for providing these Islamic goons with the same liberties as the Americans they targeted. This trial will turn into nothing more than a dog-and-pony show for these Islamic killer. There is talk that KSM will act as his own legal representation. Why wouldn't he be? At this point, his goal is to be a martyr and he will chuckle inside knowing that Americans are willing to give him that platform.

Here's a possible scenario for you to consider: The politically correct crowd is going to come out in full force for the first part of the trial ... jury selection. The PC warriors are going to demand that there be Muslims on the jury. What if they succeed? What if the Muslim juror decides that there is no way he can vote to convict a warrior for Allah .. no matter what the evidence says. Oh sure, he can lie his turban off during jury selection and utter the right platitudes about reaching a fair verdict ... all the while knowing that he is going to do what any good Muslim would do .. protect a fellow Muslim from the wrath of the non-believers. Result? Hung jury. No conviction. And then where do we go?

Oh ... by the way. You do know that KSL was never read his Miranda Rights, don't you? How much evidence is going to be thrown out because this Islamic murderer didn't have his right to counsel when he was first captured?

Plenty of questions, aren't there? Try this one ... Then there's the pesky little question of ... is this even legal? Jamie Dupree points out the 2010 Defense Authorization Act, H.R. 2647 that Barack Obama recently signed into law.

Just so you know, the Republican did TRY to prevent this from happening. House Republicans introduced legislation that would have prevented Gitmo detainees from coming to the United States. But because Democrats have a majority, they didn't even allow the legislation to move out of committee.

The Republicans in Washington clearly do not support this move by "Sort of God" Obama to bring KSM to the Unites States and put him on criminal trial. But did you know that opposing this plan makes you ... un-American?

I kid you not. Democrat Rep. Jim Moran had this to say about Republicans opposed to Eric Holder's plan: "They see this as an opportunity to demagogue ... They will seize on any opportunity to do that, and that means they'll even take a stand that's un-American."

Yeah .. and treating an attack on America as a simple criminal act is ... what?

Controversy over how to handle KSM and his Islamic goon posse is nothing new. In fact, you may be curious to hear how Barack Obama wanted to see KSM put to justice back in 2006.

Quite a bit different than what he has made reality, now isn't it?

Senator Joe Lieberman has really stepped in it.  He dared to suggest that the shooting in Fort Hood was an act of "Islamist extremism."  He told Fox News yesterday, "There are very, very strong warning signs here that Dr. Hasan had become an Islamist extremist and, therefore, that this was a terrorist act."

Let's go to the definitions here.   A terrorist act is generally defined as the mass murder of civilians for political purposes.  This was an attack on soldiers in uniform.  Perhaps it was more of an act of war than of terror.  What's certain is that this is another real manifestation of the Islamic code and culture of violence. 

More about those three ISLAMIC terror plots that have been exposed. Did you know that in each case the MUSLIM goons have been charged them with a plot to kill Americans using ... now get this ... "weapons of mass destruction."

So, just what types of weapons were these MUSLIM terrorists going to use? The evidence seems to be that they were thinking about putting hydrogen peroxide-based explosives into backpacks where they could be triggered by cell phones. There is also a report that they tried at one point to rent a truck. There's another story out there about a foiled MUSLIM terrorist plot in Illinois. Wolf Blitzer told us last night that the suspect actually tried to push the button on a truck bomb. Blitzer specifically referred to this as a "weapon of mass destruction."

What's the big point here? Well .. the constant media use of the "weapons of mass destruction" phrase. Really? Is that what these ISLAMIC terrorist suspects were going to use? Maybe it's just me, but all this time I thought that the phrase applied to nuclear and chemical or biological weapons. I guess I was wrong, and if this is the actual description of a "weapon of mass destruction," then guess what? We DID, in fact, find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Under the definition currently being used, every car bomb and every IED was a weapon of mass destruction. President Bush said they were there ... we went there to find them ... and find them we did!

So .. the next time some leftist moonbat starts in on this "where were the weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq bit ... you know what to do.

Well ... it never should have left.

For a while, it seems as though this nation has lost a sense of urgency when it comes to matters of national security and terrorism. Maybe that is because the previous administration did a fine job of keeping this country safe after 9/11. Or maybe it is because you feel so safe now that Barack Obama and the liberal Left are in charge and playing nice-nice with those who hate us. But the latest details of these FBI al Qaeda probes warrant a little more than a glancing headline.

Before we continue though ... I want you to count how many times you see the words "Muslim" or "Islam" appear in any articles related to this story.

Moving right along ... Over the weekend the FBI arrested two Muslim men, Najibullah Zazi and his father, Mohammed for making false statements. The FBI had been investigating what they thought was a plot to detonate homemade bombs in the US. Turns out that the son, Zazi received al-Qaida explosives training in Pakistan. He was also found trying to entering New York City two weeks ago with bomb-making instructions on his computer. Backpacks and cell phones were seized in raids on apartments Zazi visited while in New York. The FBI believes that these cell phones could have been used to detonate hydrogen-peroxide bombs hidden in backpacks. Their targets may have included various locations or events in New York City like Subway stations or some fashion show. So these Muslims appeared in New York on Monday. Oops. Called them "Muslims." That's more than the newspapers did.

Now federal authorities are saying that as many as a dozen people may be tied to a suspected al Qaeda bomb plot in the US. So the government has expanded its terrorism warning not just to transit systems but to stadiums, hotels and entertainment complexes around the country.

Worried? Even a little? How far would you want our government to go in trying to get to the bottom of these threats ... and perhaps save lives? Would you care if we poured water on Zazi's head to make him THINK he was drowning, even though he would be in no danger? If not that, could we just deprive him of a little sleep to make him talk?

Nope ... can't do those things. That would be torture. Besides, remember that the White House is now in charge of interrogations ... so maybe now you feel even a little bit safer! Right?

Another goodie from the White House. Let's see how you feel about this one.

Barack Obama has decided that the task of interrogating terrorists and terrorist suspects should be left up to the White House, rather than the CIA. Obama has created an "elite team" of interrogators that will question suspects in accordance with the Army Field Manual. The name of the unit will be the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group, or HIG. The unit will be overseen by the National Security Council, which gives the White House direct oversight. The rules are that all interrogation of terrorist suspects must be interrogated in compliance with the terms of the Army Field Manuel. Does that tell you enough? Well ... here's more. This means that if you catch some Muslim goon who you absolutely know is involved in a plot to kill a few thousand innocent Americans; and if you are dead-on certain that this individual has information on the details of this plot, but he refuses to talk ---- we cannot deprive him of any sleep or play loud music to encourage him. Loud music and sleep deprivation are, I suppose, defined by Team Obama as "torture."

Is anyone keeping a scorecard here? First we learn that the White House is going to seize control of the 2010 Census. We know that this is so the census can be politicized and the numbers of people prone to vote Democrat can be inflated. Now we learn that the Obama White House is going to have its own Presidential Unit for Safe Suspect Interrogation.

Interesting acronym there.

Yep. The Obama administration has made it official .. we are not longer engaged in a "war on terrorism." You won't see the word "jihadists" either. Nor the words "global war." The head of the White House homeland security office, John Brennan says that this is a "new way of seeing" things. Instead, the only terminology that will be used is "at war with al Qaeda."

That's it. "We are at war with al Qaeda," says Brennan. "We are at war with its violent extremist allies who seek to carry on al Qaeda's murderous agenda."

Don't you feel so much safer now?

Department of Defense employees must take written exams as part of their routine training. See if you can correctly answer the following question:

"Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism?"

• Attacking the Pentagon
• IEDs
• Hate crimes against racial groups
• Protests

Any guesses? I bet you know where this one is going, don't you? That's right. Protests. Now we have the Defense Department telling their workers that protests are "low-level terrorism." Excuse me, but isn't there something in the Constitution about the right to "peaceably assemble?" And then there's something else about the right to "petition the government for a redress of grievances." Now we call these activities low-level terrorism? What does that make all you tea-party demonstrators from earlier this year? Low-level terrorists?

Do you feel comfortable with this? Not I!

What do you think? Is this really Osama bin Laden? Do you think he's even still alive?

Finally, later yesterday afternoon, the media came around. At least, some of the media. Finally we get headlines identifying this Army recruiter shooter as a Muslim. Or more precisely, a "Muslim convert." Overall the media has been pretty mum on the subject. But it turns out that the suspect Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad is a homegrown terrorist. He's a radical Muslim. He attacked the army recruiters earlier this week "because of what they had done to Muslims in the past." It also turns out that this radical lowlife was under investigation by the FBI's Joint Terrorist Task Force after he had traveled to Yemen with a Somali passport.

This means that this goon's attack on those two soldiers outside that Arkansas recruiting center was an Islamic terrorist attack.

Today we're learning that this Islamic goon had a list of other targets he wanted to hit on his computer. How many more like him are there out there? My guess? More than you could be comfortable with.